Literature DB >> 31625686

Assessment of fish communities using environmental DNA: Effect of spatial sampling design in lentic systems of different sizes.

Shan Zhang1,2, Qi Lu1,2, Yiyan Wang1, Xiaomei Wang3, Jindong Zhao1,2, Meng Yao1,2.   

Abstract

Freshwater fish biodiversity is quickly decreasing and requires effective monitoring and conservation. Environmental DNA (eDNA)-based methods have been shown to be highly sensitive and cost-efficient for aquatic biodiversity surveys, but few studies have systematically investigated how spatial sampling design affects eDNA-detected fish communities across lentic systems of different sizes. We compared the spatial patterns of fish diversity determined using eDNA in three lakes of small (SL; 3 ha), medium (ML; 122 ha) and large (LL; 4,343 ha) size using a spatially explicit grid sampling method. A total of 100 water samples (including nine, 17 and 18 shoreline samples and six, 14 and 36 interior samples from SL, ML and LL, respectively) were collected, and fish communities were analysed using eDNA metabarcoding of the mitochondrial 12S region. Together, 30, 35 and 41 fish taxa were detected in samples from SL, ML, and LL, respectively. We observed that eDNA from shoreline samples effectively captured the majority of the fish diversity of entire waterbodies, and pooled samples recovered fewer species than individually processed samples. Significant spatial autocorrelations between fish communities within 250 m and 2 km of each other were detected in ML and LL, respectively. Additionally, the relative sequence abundances of many fish species exhibited spatial distribution patterns that correlated with their typical habitat occupation. Overall, our results support the validity of a shoreline sampling strategy for eDNA-based fish community surveys in lentic systems but also suggest that a spatially comprehensive sampling design can reveal finer distribution patterns of individual species.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beta diversity; eDNA metabarcoding; fish ecology; freshwater biodiversity; lakes; spatial autocorrelation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31625686     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  7 in total

1.  Comparing eDNA metabarcoding primers for assessing fish communities in a biodiverse estuary.

Authors:  Girish Kumar; Ashley M Reaume; Emily Farrell; Michelle R Gaither
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Effects of sampling seasons and locations on fish environmental DNA metabarcoding in dam reservoirs.

Authors:  Kana Hayami; Masayuki K Sakata; Takashi Inagawa; Jiro Okitsu; Izumi Katano; Hideyuki Doi; Katsuki Nakai; Hidetaka Ichiyanagi; Ryo O Gotoh; Masaki Miya; Hirotoshi Sato; Hiroki Yamanaka; Toshifumi Minamoto
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 3.  Standards for Methods Utilizing Environmental DNA for Detection of Fish Species.

Authors:  Lu Shu; Arne Ludwig; Zuogang Peng
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Using environmental DNA methods to improve detectability in an endangered sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis) monitoring program.

Authors:  Dan Yu; Zhongyuan Shen; Tao Chang; Sha Li; Huanzhang Liu
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-01

5.  Environmental DNA captures native and non-native fish community variations across the lentic and lotic systems of a megacity.

Authors:  Shan Zhang; Yitao Zheng; Aibin Zhan; Chunxia Dong; Jindong Zhao; Meng Yao
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 6.  Environmental DNA analysis as an emerging non-destructive method for plant biodiversity monitoring: a review.

Authors:  Pritam Banerjee; Kathryn A Stewart; Gobinda Dey; Caterina M Antognazza; Raju Kumar Sharma; Jyoti Prakash Maity; Santanu Saha; Hideyuki Doi; Natasha de Vere; Michael W Y Chan; Pin-Yun Lin; Hung-Chun Chao; Chien-Yen Chen
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 7.  Reinforcement of Environmental DNA Based Methods (Sensu Stricto) in Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation: A Review.

Authors:  Pritam Banerjee; Gobinda Dey; Caterina M Antognazza; Raju Kumar Sharma; Jyoti Prakash Maity; Michael W Y Chan; Yi-Hsun Huang; Pin-Yun Lin; Hung-Chun Chao; Chung-Ming Lu; Chien-Yen Chen
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.