Literature DB >> 3162515

Synergy between high-dose cytarabine and asparaginase in the treatment of adults with refractory and relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia--a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study.

R L Capizzi1, R Davis, B Powell, J Cuttner, R R Ellison, M R Cooper, R Dillman, W B Major, E Dupre, O R McIntyre.   

Abstract

One hundred ninety-five adult patients with refractory or first relapse acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) were randomly assigned to receive high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC), 3 g/m2 as a three-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 12 hours for four doses, followed by 6,000 IU/m2 asparaginase (ASNase) administered at hour 42, or HiDAC without ASNase. Treatment was repeated on day 8. The median patient age was 52 years. There was an overall superior complete remission (CR) rate for HiDAC/ASNase (40%) v HiDAC (24%), P = .02. Subset analysis according to prior response and age showed the following CR rates: 54% from HiDAC/ASNase treatment of refractory AML in patients less than 60 years, and 31% in patients greater than 60 years; CR from HiDAC in the same refractory groups were 18% (less than 60) and 0% (greater than 60); 37% from HiDAC/ASNase treatment of relapsed AML in patients less than 60 years, and 43% in patients greater than 60 years; CRs from HiDAC in the same relapsed groups were 33% (less than 60) and 21% (greater than 60). Toxicity in the two treatment arms was comparable and consisted primarily of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, mild hepatic dysfunction, diarrhea, conjunctivitis and serositis, and hyperglycemia. There was only one case of transient cerebellar toxicity and no cutaneous toxicity. Median time to full hematologic recovery was 5 weeks. There was an overall survival benefit for patients treated with HiDAC/ASNase (19.6 weeks) compared with HiDAC (15.9 weeks), P = .046, primarily attributable to effects in refractory patients. Median time to failure for refractory patients who achieved CR was 38.5 weeks with HiDAC/ASNase, and 13.3 weeks for those treated with HiDAC. For relapsed patients in CR from HiDAC/ASNase the median time to failure was 17.7 weeks and 18.3 weeks for HiDAC. The overall 42% CR rate from HiDAC/ASNase v 12% from HiDAC in patients with refractory AML indicates that HiDAC/ASNase is not cross-resistant with standard-dose cytarabine (SDAC) and anthracyclines. We conclude that HiDAC/ASNase has substantial activity in poor-prognosis AML and that this combination warrants further trials in earlier stage disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3162515     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.3.499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  13 in total

1.  Acute myeloid leukemia with mediastinal myeloid sarcoma refractory to acute myeloid leukemia therapy but responsive to L-asparaginase.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Takahashi; Katsuyoshi Koh; Motohiro Kato; Hiroshi Kishimoto; Eiji Oguma; Ryoji Hanada
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Clinical features of adult-onset chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Ayako Arai; Ken-Ichi Imadome; Yuko Watanabe; Mayumi Yoshimori; Takatoshi Koyama; Takeharu Kawaguchi; Chiaki Nakaseko; Shigeyoshi Fujiwara; Osamu Miura
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  Erythrocyte encapsulated l-asparaginase (GRASPA) in acute leukemia.

Authors:  Xavier Thomas; Caroline Le Jeune
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-05-05

4.  Inhibiting glutamine uptake represents an attractive new strategy for treating acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Lise Willems; Nathalie Jacque; Arnaud Jacquel; Nathalie Neveux; Thiago Trovati Maciel; Mireille Lambert; Alain Schmitt; Laury Poulain; Alexa S Green; Madalina Uzunov; Olivier Kosmider; Isabelle Radford-Weiss; Ivan Cruz Moura; Patrick Auberger; Norbert Ifrah; Valérie Bardet; Nicolas Chapuis; Catherine Lacombe; Patrick Mayeux; Jérôme Tamburini; Didier Bouscary
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Treatment strategies in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). B. Second line treatment.

Authors:  W Hiddemann; T Büchner
Journal:  Blut       Date:  1990-03

6.  Synthetic Lethality of Wnt Pathway Activation and Asparaginase in Drug-Resistant Acute Leukemias.

Authors:  Laura Hinze; Maren Pfirrmann; Salmaan Karim; James Degar; Connor McGuckin; Divya Vinjamur; Joshua Sacher; Kristen E Stevenson; Donna S Neuberg; Esteban Orellana; Martin Stanulla; Richard I Gregory; Daniel E Bauer; Florence F Wagner; Kimberly Stegmaier; Alejandro Gutierrez
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  Intensively timed combination chemotherapy for the induction of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: long-term follow-up of a phase 2 study.

Authors:  Michael Rytting; Farhad Ravandi; Elihu Estey; Jorge Cortes; Stefan Faderl; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Sima Jeha; Souzanne Ouzounian; Sherry Pierce; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  High dose cytarabine, mitoxantrone and l-asparaginase (HAMA) salvage for relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the elderly.

Authors:  Tamjeed Ahmed; Scott Holwerda; Heidi D Klepin; Scott Isom; Leslie R Ellis; Susan Lyerly; Megan Manuel; Sarah Dralle; Dmitriy Berenzon; Bayard L Powell; Timothy S Pardee
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.156

Review 9.  Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: biological features and search for adequate treatment.

Authors:  V Heinemann; U Jehn
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.673

10.  High-dose ara-C and etoposide in refractory or relapsing acute leukemia.

Authors:  M Freund; H Link; H Diedrich; S LeBlanc; H J Wilke; H Poliwoda
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.