Literature DB >> 31625120

Carers' and paediatric dentists' perceptions of children's pain during restorative treatment.

V O M Brilhante1, P Corrêa-Faria1, G C M Machado1, L R Costa2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Parents/carers' and dentists' evaluations are important when assessing young children's pain. However, there is little evidence on agreement regarding children's pain according to proxy reports. The aims of this cross-sectional study were to investigate the agreement among paediatric dentists and parents/carers about children's pain during treatment and the association between the reporting of pain and child behaviour.
METHODS: Participants were 81 parents/carers of uncooperative children undergoing restorative treatment, and five paediatric dentists. Pain during dental treatment was assessed after dental procedures using the Visual Analogue Scale (0-4 mm: no pain; 5-44 mm: mild pain; 45-74 mm: moderate pain; 75-100 mm: severe pain). Child behaviour was assessed by calibrated researchers using the Ohio State University Behavioural Scale. The agreement between respondents about a child's pain was evaluated using the weighted kappa test. The association between the pain report and child behaviour was verified using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.
RESULTS: Parents/carers (36, 44.4%) and paediatric dentists (40, 49.4%) reported that children felt mild pain in all sessions. The parents/carers reported that the children experienced higher pain intensities compared to paediatric dentists. The agreement between respondents was slight (weighted Kappa < 0.20). Higher pain intensities were more frequent when the children's behaviour was uncooperative.
CONCLUSION: Parents/carers and paediatric dentists showed slight agreement regarding the pain felt by children in dental treatment. Pain proxy reporting in children is influenced by the children's behaviour.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute pain; Child, preschool; Dentists; Pain, procedural; Parents

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31625120     DOI: 10.1007/s40368-019-00486-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent        ISSN: 1818-6300


  33 in total

1.  Parental catastrophizing about child's pain and its relationship with activity restriction: the mediating role of parental distress.

Authors:  L Caes; T Vervoort; C Eccleston; M Vandenhende; L Goubert
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  PhysioDoloris: a monitoring device for analgesia / nociception balance evaluation using heart rate variability analysis.

Authors:  R Logier; M Jeanne; J De Jonckheere; A Dassonneville; M Delecroix; B Tavernier
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

3.  Current UK dental sedation practice and the 'National Institute for Health and Care Excellence' (NICE) guideline 112: sedation in children and young people.

Authors:  P Coulthard; D Craig; C Holden; N D Robb; M Sury; S Chopra; I Holroyd
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Contextual and individual determinants of dental pain in preschool children.

Authors:  Osmar Martins Ferreira-Júnior; Maria do Carmo Matias Freire; Rafael da Silveira Moreira; Luciane Rezende Costa
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.383

Review 5.  Parent-child agreement across child health-related quality of life instruments: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Penney Upton; Joanne Lawford; Christine Eiser
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Effect of audiovisual eyeglasses during dental treatment in 5-8 year-old children.

Authors:  K Mitrakul; Y Asvanund; M Arunakul; S Paka-Akekaphat
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 7.  Efficacy of Ketamine in Pediatric Sedation Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Samuel Oh; Karl Kingsley
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2018-05

8.  A comparison of pain assessment by physicians, parents and children in an outpatient setting.

Authors:  Christina Brudvik; Svein-Denis Moutte; Valborg Baste; Tone Morken
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Intranasal sedation using ketamine and midazolam for pediatric dental treatment (NASO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Heloisa Sousa Gomes; Analya Rodrigues Miranda; Karolline Alves Viana; Aline Carvalho Batista; Paulo Sucasas Costa; Anelise Daher; Geovanna de Castro Morais Machado; Joji Sado-Filho; Liliani Aires Candido Vieira; Patrícia Corrêa-Faria; Marie Therese Hosey; Luciane Rezende Costa
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Patient-reported outcomes associated with different restorative techniques in pediatric dentistry: A systematic review and MTC meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nathalia Miranda Ladewig; Tamara Kerber Tedesco; Thaís Gimenez; Mariana Minatel Braga; Daniela Prócida Raggio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.