| Literature DB >> 31624554 |
Giulia Anderson1, John Hampton2, Neville Smith2, Ciro Rico1,3.
Abstract
Albacore tuna (Thunnus alalunga) has a distinctly complex life history in which juveniles and adults separate geographically but at times inhabit the same spaces sequentially. The species also migrates long distances and presumably experiences varied regimes of physical stress over a lifetime. There are, therefore, many opportunities for population structure to arise based on stochastic differences or environmental factors that promote local adaptation. However, with the extent of mobility consistently demonstrated by tagged individuals, there is also a strong argument for panmixia within an ocean basin. It is important to confirm such assumptions from a population genetics standpoint for this species in particular because albacore is one of the principal market tuna species that sustains massive global fisheries and yet is also a slow-growing temperate tuna. Consequently, we used 1,837 neutral SNP loci and 89 loci under potential selection to analyze population genetic structure among five sample groups collected from the western and central South Pacific. We found no evidence to challenge panmixia at neutral loci, but strong indications of structuring at adaptive loci. One population sample, from French Polynesia in 2004, was particularly differentiated. Unfortunately, the current study cannot infer whether the divergence is geographic or temporal, or possibly caused by sample distribution. We encourage future studies to include potentially adaptive loci and to continue fine-scale observations within an ocean basin, and not to assume genome-wide panmixia.Entities:
Keywords: Thunnus alalunga; adaptive genetic structure; life stage; single nucleotide polymorphism
Year: 2019 PMID: 31624554 PMCID: PMC6787800 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5554
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Albacore tuna, Thunnus alalunga. Illustration: Les Hata, © Pacific Community
Figure 2Map of sample sight locations. Size of circle represents the number of fish caught inside blue line of each country's EEZ boundaries. Inset: albacore range in the Pacific, from http://www.fao.org/figis/geoserver/factsheets/species.html
Number of loci remaining after each quality filtering step for datasets using neutral loci (NL) and loci under potential selection (LUPS)
| Filtering step | All population samples | New Caledonia samples | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NL | LUPS | NL | LUPS | |
| Initial | 27,295 | 27,295 | 27,295 | 27,295 |
| Duplicates on contig | 18,900 | 18,900 | 18,900 | 18,900 |
| Call rate (99%) | 6,351 | 6,351 | 6,351 | 6,351 |
| Read depth (7x) | 5,624 | 5,624 | 5,624 | 5,624 |
| MAF (5%) | 2,144 | 2,144 | 2,230 | 2,230 |
|
| 2,011 |
| 2,163 |
|
| HWE ( | 2,011 | – | 2,163 | – |
|
| 1,837 | – | 1,925 | – |
| LD (70%) |
| – |
| – |
Bolded values are the final number of loci per dataset.
Measures of diversity for each population sample, including the inbreeding coefficient F IS, adjusted expected heterozygosity H n.b., observed heterozygosity H o, and sample size n
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC10 | .2554 (±.145) | .2551 (±.131) | −.0015 | 34 |
| NC14 | .2474 (±.138) | .2529 (±.131) | .0222 | 35 |
| NZ10 | .2371 (±.131) | .2475 (±.130) | .0427 | 39 |
| PF04 | .2480 (±.153) | .2527 (±.138) | .0192 | 21 |
| TO10 | .2244 (±.145) | .2420 (±.143) | .0748 | 18 |
Pairwise F ST values (below diagonal) and associated p values (above diagonal) between population samples using neutral loci
| NC10 | NC14 | NZ10 | PF04 | TO10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC10 | – | .0538 |
| .0812 | .2111 |
| NC14 | .0016 | – |
| .1979 | .3833 |
| NZ10 |
|
| – | .0638 | .4563 |
| PF04 | .0018 | .0014 | .0024 | – | .4695 |
| TO10 | .0014 | .0011 | .0011 | .0011 | – |
Bold indicates values that are statistically significant.
Figure 3DAPC calculated for all individuals. Analysis of neutral loci (left panel) used 24 principal components and 4 df; analyses of loci under potential selection (right panel) used eight principal components and 4 df
Pairwise F ST values (below diagonal) and associated p values (above diagonal) between population samples using loci under potential selection
| NC10 | NC14 | NZ10 | PF04 | TO10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC10 | – |
|
|
|
|
| NC14 |
| – |
|
|
|
| NZ10 |
|
| – |
|
|
| PF04 |
|
|
| – |
|
| TO10 |
|
|
|
| – |
Bold indicates values that are statistically significant.
Figure 4Probability of population placement assuming there are two true populations among the observed samples (k = 2), as recommended by ADMIXTURE for the LUPS dataset
Figure 5DAPC calculated for two sample groups from New Caledonia, NC10 and NC14. Neutral analyses (left panel) use 23 principal components and 1 df. Loci under potential selection (right panel) use one principal component and 1 df