Literature DB >> 31624452

The Mandible is Further Retruded Under General Anesthesia: The Latent Concept for a Favorable Outcome in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.

Kazuhiro Matsushita1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In orthognathic surgery, we often experience that model mounting by the occlusal bite record taken at centric relation under the conscious condition in the sitting position does not always correctly replicate the actual maxilla-mandibular relationship under general anesthesia. Mandible often moves backward further in the latter condition. The present study was carried out to investigate the degree of extra retrusion of the mandible under general anesthesia and to determine the characteristics in each of the three original skeletal class patterns in a Japanese population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with jaw deformities (14 males and 36 females) were enrolled in this prospective study, their ages ranging from 16 to 49 years. The occlusal bite record at the incisor region obtained from a mounted articulator was compared with the records from the oral cavity of the patient under general anesthesia before surgery.
RESULTS: Retrusion in the supine position under general anesthesia was observed in all skeletal classes, and it was significantly greater in skeletal Class II, compared to skeletal Class I and Class III.
CONCLUSION: This study clearly revealed the difference among three different skeletal classes, and the mandible in the skeletal Class II moved backward significantly compared to other classes. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  General anesthesia; Mandibular retrusion; Skeletal Class II

Year:  2019        PMID: 31624452      PMCID: PMC6795662          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-019-01199-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  12 in total

1.  Intraoperative diagnosis of condylar sag after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Johan P Reyneke; C Ferretti
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.651

2.  Diurnal variance of centric relation position.

Authors:  I Shafagh; J L Yoder; K E Thayer
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  The glossary of prosthodontic terms.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Maintenance of condyle-proximal segment position in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  K S Rotskoff; E G Herbosa; P Villa
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the effect of an additional L-shaped plate on straight or box plate fixation in sagittal split ramus osteotomy using a bioabsorbable plate system.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Matsushita; Nobuo Inoue; Yasunori Totsuka
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-03-04

6.  The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth Edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  The glossary of prosthodontic terms. The Academy of Prosthodontics.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  General anesthesia in orthognathic surgeries: does it affect horizontal jaw relations?

Authors:  Masoud Yaghmaei; Masoud Ejlali; Sekieneh Nikzad; Ashraf Sayyedi; Shahrouz Shafaeifard; Fereydoun Pourdanesh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  The effect of posture and anesthesia on the occlusal relationship in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  M A Bamber; Z Abang; W F Ng; M Harris; A Linney
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Skeletal stability following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) with and without condylar positioning device.

Authors:  Marcus Gerressen; Gereon Stockbrink; Ralf Smeets; Dieter Riediger; Alireza Ghassemi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.