Literature DB >> 31624442

The Versatility of Nasolabial Flaps in Maxillofacial Surgery.

Sujeeth Kumar Shetty1, Surabhi Sarkar1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The nasolabial flap can be used for reconstruction of the orofacial region. The procedure is of a short duration and treats orofacial soft tissue defects of small to moderate size, especially when microsurgical free flaps are less feasible due to lack of infrastructure, expertise or financial constraints. AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To study the effectiveness of the nasolabial flaps in reconstruction of orofacial defects of various origins.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 10 patients (18 nasolabial flaps) were selected randomly regardless of age, sex and need for reconstruction-whether it being requirement of tissue coverage following traumatic loss of soft tissue, soft tissue coverage after resection of a benign or malignant tumor, or resection of soft tissue defects after excision of submucous fibrosis bands. Patients were treated under general anesthesia following routine investigations, using either inferiorly or superiorly based, unilateral or bilateral nasolabial flaps for local extraoral and intraoral reconstruction. Patients were evaluated for postoperative complications, flap uptake, donor site morbidity and postoperative extraoral scarring.
RESULTS: In all cases, postoperative complications were relatively minor except in one flap where total flap loss was encountered. The average time taken for preparation of recipient site, flap elevation and closure was 72 min. The nasolabial flap proved itself to be extremely vascular and thus safe and suitable with satisfactory cosmetic outcomes.
CONCLUSION: The nasolabial flap proves to be a versatile flap with a proven blood supply from the facial, transverse facial and infraorbital vessels. It establishes itself as a simple procedure to execute to reconstruct the various defects of the anterior orofacial region. It is considered to be a safe flap with a low complication rate, and most importantly it offers a cosmetically pleasing and functionally satisfactory solution. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications of nasolabial flaps; Nasolabial flap; Oral and maxillofacial reconstruction

Year:  2018        PMID: 31624442      PMCID: PMC6795653          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-018-1162-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  10 in total

1.  Nasolabial flap reconstruction of the floor of the mouth after extirpation of oral cancer.

Authors:  I K Cohen; S D Theogaraj
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Nasolabial flaps in oral reconstruction: an analysis of 224 cases.

Authors:  B T Varghese; P Sebastian; T Cherian; P M Mohan; I Ahmed; C M Koshy; S Thomas
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2001-09

3.  Oral functional outcome after intraoral reconstruction with nasolabial flaps.

Authors:  E I Hofstra; S O P Hofer; J M Nauta; J L N Roodenburg; D H E Lichtendahl
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2004-03

4.  Nasolabial flap for the reconstruction of defects of the floor of the mouth.

Authors:  C Ioannides; E Fossion
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  The surgical anatomy of the nasolabial fold.

Authors:  M A Pogrel; S Shariati; B Schmidt; Z H Faal; J Regezi
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1998-10

6.  Surgery for severe trismus in submucous fibrosis.

Authors:  N M Kavarana; H M Bhathena
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1987-07

7.  Use of the nasolabial flap for reconstruction of the floor of the mouth.

Authors:  H S Gewirtz; F R Eilber; H A Zarem
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  The inferiorly and superiorly based nasolabial flap for the reconstruction of moderate-sized oronasal defects.

Authors:  N Lazaridis; L Zouloumis; G Venetis; D Karakasis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  A review of nasolabial flaps for intra-oral defects.

Authors:  K L Mutimer; M D Poole
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1987-09

10.  Nasolabial flap in intraoral reconstruction. Review of 55 cases.

Authors:  R F Morgan; R G Chambers; D A Jaques; J E Hoopes
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 2.565

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.