Shallu Bansal 1 , Dinesh Kumar Verma 1 , Manjunath Rai 2 , Abhinay Sorake 3 , Charanpreet Kaur 1 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
AIM: The main aim of this study is to compare the gap arthroplasty with interpositional gap arthroplasty for the management of TMJ ankylosis. METHODOLOGY: A prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial had been performed, on 60 patients diagnosed with TMJ ankylosis from August 2005 to June 2015. Patients were equally divided into two groups: Group I patients were treated with gap arthroplasty, while patients in Group II were treated with interpositional arthroplasty. RESULTS: The mean age in Group I was 27.9 years and in Group II was 25.6 years. Trauma was the common etiological factor in both the groups. The mean postoperative mouth opening after 1 month, 6 months and 24 months was found to better in Group II. Open bite after 24 months was present in six patients in Group I and in one case in Group II. Permanent facial nerve palsy was present in one patient in both the groups. Frey's syndrome was present in one patient from Group I and none from Group II. Reoccurrence occurred in eight cases from Group I (26.6%) and none from Group II. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that interpositional arthroplasty is better than gap arthroplasty in terms of mouth opening and reankylosis. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2018.
AIM: The main aim of this study is to compare the gap arthroplasty with interpositional gap arthroplasty for the management of TMJ ankylosis. METHODOLOGY: A prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial had been performed, on 60 patients diagnosed with TMJ ankylosis from August 2005 to June 2015. Patients were equally divided into two groups: Group I patients were treated with gap arthroplasty, while patients in Group II were treated with interpositional arthroplasty. RESULTS: The mean age in Group I was 27.9 years and in Group II was 25.6 years. Trauma was the common etiological factor in both the groups. The mean postoperative mouth opening after 1 month, 6 months and 24 months was found to better in Group II. Open bite after 24 months was present in six patients in Group I and in one case in Group II. Permanent facial nerve palsy was present in one patient in both the groups. Frey's syndrome was present in one patient from Group I and none from Group II. Reoccurrence occurred in eight cases from Group I (26.6%) and none from Group II. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that interpositional arthroplasty is better than gap arthroplasty in terms of mouth opening and reankylosis. © The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2018.
Entities: Chemical
Keywords:
Gap arthroplasty; Interpositional gap arthroplasty; Reankylosis; Reoccurrence; TMJ ankylosis
Year: 2018
PMID: 31624438 PMCID: PMC6795650 DOI: 10.1007/s12663-018-1150-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Maxillofac Oral Surg ISSN: 0972-8270