Literature DB >> 31624365

Heterogeneity in adult anthropometry by socioeconomic factors: Indian National Family Health Survey 2006 and 2016.

Rockli Kim1, Praveen Kumar Pathak2, Niharika Tripathi3, S V Subramanian4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: Recent evidence suggests nonconstant nature of dispersion in adult women's body mass index (BMI) across sociodemographic groups. The overall variances in BMI and height are also shown to have substantially changed over time. We modeled complex variation in adults' anthropometry-BMI and height-by wealth and education, and assessed their differences over time in India. SUBJECTS/
METHODS: Data from a total of 768,130 women and 180,691 men from the Indian National Family Health Survey (NFHS) 2006 and 2016 were used for the analysis. The average association between wealth and education with anthropometry was assessed from linear regression models assuming constant variance. Individual heterogeneity was modeled to obtain separate variances in anthropometry for each wealth quintile and education level. All analyses were stratified by survey year and sex.
RESULTS: On average, the positive socioeconomic gradient in adult's BMI and height persisted over time with slight attenuation. The residual variance in BMI ranged from 10.1 to 14.9 (7.2-11.3) by education level and 6.1 to 17.4 (5.0-13.0) by household wealth for women (men) in 2006, and they increased over time for the lower socioeconomic groups but remained the same or decreased for the higher socioeconomic groups. No significant pattern was observed for variation in height for both genders.
CONCLUSIONS: We found potential reversal in the socioeconomic patterning in BMI variability in India as suggested by the increasing dispersion among the least educated and poorest populations. For a comprehensive understanding of nutrition transition in developing countries, it is necessary to assess the changes in means and variances of anthropometry in tandem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31624365     DOI: 10.1038/s41430-019-0511-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  1 in total

1.  Health inequalities and social group differences: what should we measure?

Authors:  C J Murray; E E Gakidou; J Frenk
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.408

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Clinical Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Trifocal Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens in an Indian Population.

Authors:  Dandapani Ramamurthy; Abhay Vasavada; Prema Padmanabhan; Jagadesh C Reddy; Naren Shetty; Arindam Dey; Rachapalle Reddi Sudhir
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-22

2.  Patterning of individual variability in neurocognitive health among South African women exposed to childhood maltreatment.

Authors:  Christy A Denckla; Sun Yeop Lee; Rockli Kim; Georgina Spies; Jennifer J Vasterling; S V Subramanian; Soraya Seedat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.