Literature DB >> 31623996

Unboxing AI - Radiological Insights Into a Deep Neural Network for Lung Nodule Characterization.

Vasantha Kumar Venugopal1, Kiran Vaidhya2, Murali Murugavel3, Abhijith Chunduru2, Vidur Mahajan3, Suthirth Vaidya2, Digvijay Mahra2, Akshay Rangasai2, Harsh Mahajan3.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To explain predictions of a deep residual convolutional network for characterization of lung nodule by analyzing heat maps.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 20-layer deep residual CNN was trained on 1245 Chest CTs from National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) trial to predict the malignancy risk of a nodule. We used occlusion to systematically block regions of a nodule and map drops in malignancy risk score to generate clinical attribution heatmaps on 103 nodules from Lung Image Database Consortium image collection and Image Database Resource Initiative (LIDC-IDRI) dataset, which were analyzed by a thoracic radiologist. The features were described as heat inside nodule -bright areas inside nodule, peripheral heat continuous/interrupted bright areas along nodule contours, heat in adjacent plane -brightness in scan planes juxtaposed with the nodule, satellite heat - a smaller bright spot in proximity to nodule in the same scan plane, heat map larger than nodule bright areas corresponding to the shape of the nodule seen outside the nodule margins and heat in calcification.
RESULTS: These six features were assigned binary values. This feature vector was fedinto a standard J48 decision tree with 10-fold cross-validation, which gave an 85 % weighted classification accuracy with a 77.8% True Positive (TP) rate, 8% False Positive (FP) rate for benign cases and 91.8% TP and 22.2% FP rates for malignant cases. Heat Inside nodule was more frequently observed in nodules classified as malignant whereas peripheral heat, heat in adjacent plane, and satellite heat were more commonly seen in nodules classified as benign.
CONCLUSION: We discuss the potential ability of a radiologist to visually parse the deep learning algorithm generated "heat map" to identify features aiding classification.
Copyright © 2019 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Computed tomography; Neural networks; Pulmonary nodule

Year:  2019        PMID: 31623996     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  5 in total

1.  Clinical Explainability Failure (CEF) & Explainability Failure Ratio (EFR) - Changing the Way We Validate Classification Algorithms.

Authors:  Vasantha Kumar Venugopal; Rohit Takhar; Salil Gupta; Vidur Mahajan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  A narrative review on current imaging applications of artificial intelligence and radiomics in oncology: focus on the three most common cancers.

Authors:  Simone Vicini; Chandra Bortolotto; Marco Rengo; Daniela Ballerini; Davide Bellini; Iacopo Carbone; Lorenzo Preda; Andrea Laghi; Francesca Coppola; Lorenzo Faggioni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.313

3.  Using Occlusion-Based Saliency Maps to Explain an Artificial Intelligence Tool in Lung Cancer Screening: Agreement Between Radiologists, Labels, and Visual Prompts.

Authors:  Ziba Gandomkar; Pek Lan Khong; Amanda Punch; Sarah Lewis
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.903

4.  Radiomics Based Bayesian Inversion Method for Prediction of Cancer and Pathological Stage.

Authors:  Hina Shakir; Tariq Khan; Haroon Rasheed; Yiming Deng
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.316

5.  Detection of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Based on Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Shi Qiu; Junjun Li; Mengdi Cong; Chun Wu; Yan Qin; Ting Liang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.238

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.