| Literature DB >> 31623769 |
John Gregson1, Linda Sharples2, Gregg W Stone3, Carl-Fredrik Burman4, Fredrik Öhrn4, Stuart Pocock2.
Abstract
Most major clinical trials in cardiology report time-to-event outcomes using the Cox proportional hazards model so that a treatment effect is estimated as the hazard ratio between groups, accompanied by its 95% confidence interval and a log-rank p value. But nonproportionality of hazards (non-PH) over time occurs quite often, making alternative analysis strategies appropriate. This review presents real examples of cardiology trials with different types of non-PH: an early treatment effect, a late treatment effect, and a diminishing treatment effect. In such scenarios, the relative merits of a Cox model, an accelerated failure time model, a milestone analysis, and restricted mean survival time are examined. Some post hoc analyses for exploring any specific pattern of non-PH are also presented. Recommendations are made, particularly regarding how to handle non-PH in pre-defined Statistical Analysis Plans, trial publications, and regulatory submissions.Keywords: Cox proportional hazards; clinical trials; nonproportional hazards; statistics; time-to-event outcomes; trial design
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31623769 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol ISSN: 0735-1097 Impact factor: 24.094