Literature DB >> 31623769

Nonproportional Hazards for Time-to-Event Outcomes in Clinical Trials: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

John Gregson1, Linda Sharples2, Gregg W Stone3, Carl-Fredrik Burman4, Fredrik Öhrn4, Stuart Pocock2.   

Abstract

Most major clinical trials in cardiology report time-to-event outcomes using the Cox proportional hazards model so that a treatment effect is estimated as the hazard ratio between groups, accompanied by its 95% confidence interval and a log-rank p value. But nonproportionality of hazards (non-PH) over time occurs quite often, making alternative analysis strategies appropriate. This review presents real examples of cardiology trials with different types of non-PH: an early treatment effect, a late treatment effect, and a diminishing treatment effect. In such scenarios, the relative merits of a Cox model, an accelerated failure time model, a milestone analysis, and restricted mean survival time are examined. Some post hoc analyses for exploring any specific pattern of non-PH are also presented. Recommendations are made, particularly regarding how to handle non-PH in pre-defined Statistical Analysis Plans, trial publications, and regulatory submissions.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cox proportional hazards; clinical trials; nonproportional hazards; statistics; time-to-event outcomes; trial design

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31623769     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  11 in total

1.  Survival analysis-part 2: Cox proportional hazards model.

Authors:  Salil Vasudeo Deo; Vaishali Deo; Varun Sundaram
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-01-02

2.  Hemodynamic Characteristics and Outcomes of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients Undergoing Tricuspid Valve Repair or Replacement.

Authors:  Mahima Vijayaraghavan; Kurt W Prins; Sasha Z Prisco; Sue Duval; Ranjit John; Stephen L Archer; E Kenneth Weir; Rochus Voeller; Andrew W Shaffer; Thenappan Thenappan
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-12-16

3.  Sample size calculation for two-arm trials with time-to-event endpoint for nonproportional hazards using the concept of Relative Time when inference is built on comparing Weibull distributions.

Authors:  Milind A Phadnis; Matthew S Mayo
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 1.715

4.  Sex-Based Differences in Revascularization Outcomes: Is It Time for a Dedicated Randomized Trial in Women?

Authors:  Waqas A Malick; Kevin Soriano; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.106

5.  Restricted mean survival time of older adults with severe aortic stenosis referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Julia Rodighiero; Nicolo Piazza; Giuseppe Martucci; Marco Spaziano; Kevin Lachapelle; Benoit de Varennes; Marie-Claude Ouimet; Jonathan Afilalo
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Time-dependent treatment effects of metronomic chemotherapy in unfit AML patients: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Phichayut Phinyo; Jayanton Patumanond; Saranya Pongudom
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2021-01-06

7.  A modified weighted log-rank test for confirmatory trials with a high proportion of treatment switching.

Authors:  José L Jiménez; Julia Niewczas; Alexander Bore; Carl-Fredrik Burman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ten-year trends of clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a Korean nationwide longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Jung Min Choi; Seung-Hwa Lee; Jin-Ho Choi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Restoring invisible and abandoned trials of gabapentin for neuropathic pain: a clinical and methodological investigation.

Authors:  Evan Mayo-Wilson; Xiwei Chen; Riaz Qureshi; Stephanie Dickinson; Lilian Golzarri-Arroyo; Hwanhee Hong; Carsten Görg; Tianjing Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Challenges of modelling approaches for network meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes in the presence of non-proportional hazards to aid decision making: Application to a melanoma network.

Authors:  Suzanne C Freeman; Nicola J Cooper; Alex J Sutton; Michael J Crowther; James R Carpenter; Neil Hawkins
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.