| Literature DB >> 31623666 |
Shun-Xian Zhang1,2, Fen-Yan Kang3, Jia-Xu Chen4,5, Li-Guang Tian6,7, Lan-Lan Geng8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blastocystis is a widespread zoonotic protozoan of mammalian species, especially in HIV/AIDS individuals. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence and risk factors related with Blastocystis infection among HIV/AIDS patients in Southwest China.Entities:
Keywords: Blastocystis; Co-infection; HIV/AIDS; Interaction; Risk factor
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31623666 PMCID: PMC6796344 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-019-0596-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Poverty ISSN: 2049-9957 Impact factor: 4.520
Fig. 1Generation of evolutionary tree of Blastocystis with neighbor-joining analysis. The reference sequence was obtained from GeneBank. 12 cases were diagnosed as Blastocystis infection, Blastocystis subtype 1, subtype 3, subtype 4 and subtype 7 were three, identically
Single factor analysis of influencing factors for Blastocystis infection among HIV patients
| Variable | Univariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| χ2 | ||||||
| Age | < 40 year ( | 8 (4.5) | 171 (95.5) | 0.424 | 0.515 | 0.67 (0.20–2.27) |
| ≥ 40 year ( | 4 (3.0) | 128 (97.0) | ||||
| Gender | Male ( | 3 (2.0) | 146 (5.6) | 2.656 | 0.105 | 2.86 (0.76–10.78) |
| Female ( | 9 (98.0) | 153 (94.6) | ||||
| Nationality | Minority nationality ( | 1 (9.1) | 11 (90.9) | – | 0.356 | 0.38 (0.04–3.24) |
| Han nationality ( | 10 (3.7) | 289 (96.3) | ||||
| Residence | Urban ( | 10 (3.8) | 250 (96.2) | 0.001 | 0.980 | 1.02 (0.22–4.80) |
| Rural area ( | 2 (3.9) | 49 (96.1) | ||||
| Education level | Primary school ( | 6 (4.5) | 126 (95.5) | 1.583 | 0.633 | – |
| Junior middle school ( | 6 (3.7) | 155 (96.3) | ||||
| High school ( | 0 (0.0) | 15 (100.0) | ||||
| University or collage ( | 0 (0.0) | 3 (100.0) | ||||
| Marriage | Unmarried ( | 0 (0.0) | 25 (100.0) | 4.487 | 0.213 | – |
| Married ( | 12 (4.6) | 247 (95.4) | ||||
| Married and living alone or widowed ( | 0 (0.0) | 22 (100.0) | ||||
| Other ( | 0 (0.0) | 5 (100.0) | ||||
| Family member | < 5 individuals ( | 1 (2.1) | 47 (97.9) | – | 0.701 | 2.05 (0.26–16.27) |
| 11 (42) | 252 (95.8) | |||||
| Body mass index | Underweight ( | 2 (6.9) | 27 (93.1) | 2.862 | 0.210 | – |
| Normal ( | 9 (3.3) | 262 (96.7) | ||||
| Overweight ( | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.7) | ||||
| Drinking water | Boiled water ( | 7 (2.4) | 284 (97.6) | – | < 0.001 | 13.50 (3.80–47.70) |
| Un-boiled water ( | 5 (25.0) | 15 (75.0) | ||||
| Water source | No-tap water ( | 0 (0.0) | 11 (100.0) | – | 0.999 | – |
| Tap water ( | 12 (4.0) | 288 (96.0) | ||||
| Toilet type | Water wash toilet ( | 3 (2.2) | 132 (97.8) | 1.722 | 0.789 | 2.37 (0.63–8.93) |
| Un-water wash toilet ( | 9 (5.1) | 167 (94.9) | ||||
| Washing hand after defecation | No ( | 2 (16.7) | 10 (3.3) | – | 0.071 | 0.17 (0.03–0.90) |
| Yes ( | 10 (3.3) | 289 (96.7) | ||||
| Keeping pet | No ( | 8 (3.5) | 222 (96.5) | – | 0.518 | 1.44 (0.44–4.92) |
| Yes ( | 4 (4.9) | 77 (95.1) | ||||
| Raising animal | No ( | 1 (0.7) | 145 (99.3) | – | 0.006 | 10.36 (1.32–81.23) |
| Yes ( | 11 (6.7) | 154 (93.3) | ||||
| HIV infection route | Syringe ( | 3 (16.7) | 15 (83.3) | 6.239 | 0.044 | – |
| Mother to children ( | 0 (0.0) | 6 (100.00) | ||||
| Sex ( | 9 (3.1) | 278 (96.9) | ||||
| Take antiviral drug | No ( | 0 (0.0) | 2 (100.0) | – | 0.999 | 1.04 (1.02–10.06) |
| Yes ( | 12 (3.9) | 297 (96.1) | ||||
| Household member chronic diarrhea | No ( | 10 (3.4) | 2 (11.8) | – | 0.134 | 3.79 (0.76–18.84) |
| Yes ( | 2 (11.8) | 15 (88.2) | ||||
| CD4+ T cell count | < 500 ( | 1 (0.6) | 171 (99.4) | 11.141 | 0.001 | 0.07 (0.01–0.53) |
| 10 (3.6) | 268 (96.4) | |||||
| HIV virus load | < 50 ( | 7 (2.5) | 275 (97.5) | – | 0.002 | 8.18 (2.41–27.75) |
| 5 (17.2) | 24 (82.8) | |||||
| HIV clinical stage | I stage ( | 7 (5.1) | 131 (94.9) | 2.439 | 0.486 | – |
| II stage ( | 3 (4.1) | 70 (95.9) | ||||
| III stage ( | 2 (2.4) | 80 (97.6) | ||||
| IV stage ( | 0 (0.0) | 18 (100.0) | ||||
The “–” symbol indicates the data was not be calculated
OR Odd ratio, CI Confidence interval
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of influencing factors for Blastocystis infection among HIV patients
| Variable | B | SE | Wald | df | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raising livestock | 2.548 | 1.082 | 5.54 | 1 | 0.019 | 12.78 (1.53–106.63) |
| Drinking water | 2.109 | 0.781 | 7.286 | 1 | 0.007 | 8.24 (1.78–38.12) |
| CD4+ T count | 2.377 | 1.088 | 4.773 | 1 | 0.029 | 10.75 (1.28–90.90) |
| HIV virus load | 1.769 | 0.764 | 5.365 | 1 | 0.021 | 5.86 (1.31–26.19) |
| Constant | −9.208 | 2.886 | 10.184 | 1 | < 0.001 | – |
| Dummy variable was defined and entered in multivariate logistic regression model | ||||||
| Raising animal | 2.559 | 1.085 | 5.568 | 1 | 0.018 | 12.93 (1.54–108.36) |
| Drinking water | 2.100 | 0.783 | 7.195 | 1 | 0.007 | 8.17 (1.76–37.90) |
| CD4+ T*HIV | 12.199 | 3 | 0.007 | – | ||
| CD4+ T*HIV(1) | −4.034 | 1.203 | 11.248 | 1 | 0.001 | 0.02 (0.00–0.19) |
| CD4+ T*HIV(2) | −19.829 | 14 457.616 | < 0.001 | 1 | 0.999 | – |
| CD4+ T*HIV(3) | −1.869 | 0.793 | 5.554 | 1 | 0.018 | 0.15 (0.03–0.73) |
| Constant | −7.990 | 2.267 | 12.422 | 1 | < 0.001 | – |
The “–” symbol indicates the data was not be calculated
B Beta, SE Standard error, OR Odd ratio, CI Confidence interval
Effect of HIV virus load and CD4+ T cell count on Blastocystis infection among HIV patients
| Group | Total | Detection rate | Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIV virus load < 50 copies/ml | 7 | 275 | 282 | 2.48 (1.21–5.03) | – |
| HIV virus load | 5 | 24 | 29 | 17.20 (7.60–34.55) | – |
| CD4+ T < 500 cells/μl | 11 | 128 | 139 | 7.91 (4.47–13.61) | – |
| CD4+ T | 1 | 171 | 172 | 0.58 (0.10–3.22) | – |
| HIV virus load < 50 copies/ml and CD4+ T < 500 cells/μl | 6 | 111 | 117 | 5.13 (2.37–10.12) | 1 |
| HIV virus load < 50 copies/ml and CD4+ T | 1 | 164 | 165 | 0.61 (0.11–3.36) | 2 |
| HIV virus load | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.00 (0.00–35.43) | 3 |
| HIV virus load | 5 | 17 | 22 | 22.73 (10.74–43.44) | 4 (Reference) |
The “–” symbol indicates the data was not be calculated