| Literature DB >> 31623331 |
Jeong-Eun Kim1,2, Ji-Eun Lee3,4, Min-Jung Huh5, Sung-Chan Lee6, Seon-Mi Seo7,8, Jun Hyeong Kwon9, Il-Kwon Park10,11.
Abstract
In this study, the fumigant antifungal activity of 10 Lamiaceae plant essential oils was evaluated against two phytopathogenic fungi, Raffaelea quercus-mongolicae, and Rhizoctonia solani. Among the tested essential oils, thyme white (Thymus vulgaris) and summer savory (Satureja hortensis) essential oils exhibited the strongest fumigant antifungal activity against the phytopathogenic fungi. We analyzed the chemical composition of two active essential oils and tested the fumigant antifungal activities of the identified compounds. Among the tested compounds, thymol and carvacrol had potent fumigant antifungal activity. We observed reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in two fungi treated with thymol and carvacrol. Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of fungi stained with propidium iodide showed that thymol and carvacrol disrupted fungal cell membranes. Our results indicated that ROS generated by thymol and carvacrol damaged the cell membrane of R. querqus-mongolicae and R. solani, causing cell death.Entities:
Keywords: Satureja hortensis; Thymus vulgaris; antifungal activity; carvacrol; reactive oxygen species; thymol
Year: 2019 PMID: 31623331 PMCID: PMC6843575 DOI: 10.3390/biom9100561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
List of Lamiaceae plant essential oils.
| Common Name | Scientific Name | Source | Part |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basil | Jinarome | Leaves | |
| Hyssop | Osahdi | plants | |
| Lavender | Jinarome | Flowers | |
| Marjoram | Jinarome | Fruits | |
| Patchouli | Oshadi | Leaves | |
| Pennyroyal | Jinarome | Plants | |
| Spanish Sage | Jinarome | Flowers | |
| Spearmint | Jinarome | Flowering plants | |
| Summer Savory | Osahdi | Blossom/plants | |
| Thyme White | Jinarome | Leaves |
Figure 1Fumigant antifungal activity test.
Fumigant antifungal activities of Lamiaceae plant essential oils against R. quercus-mongolicae.
| Essential Oils. | Inhibition Rate (%, mean ± SE) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 1 | 5 | 2.5 | 1.25 | 0.625 | 0.3125 | |
| Basil | 58.42 ± 1.21b 2 | 0d | - 3 | - | - | - |
| Hyssop | 27.72 ± 2.38c | 0d | - | - | - | - |
| Lavender | 37.46 ± 8.53c | 0d | - | - | - | - |
| Marjoram | 37.30 ± 5.77c | 0d | - | - | - | - |
| Patchouli | 24.60 ± 4.27c | 0d | - | - | - | - |
| Pennyroyal | 72.38 ± 2.29b | 44.40 ± 0.35c | 34.62 ± 2.82b | 27.96 ± 2.70c | 0b | - |
| Spanish sage | 59.06 ± 1.77b | 0d | - | - | - | - |
| Spearmint | 91.76 ± 0.75a | 57.50 ± 1.55b | 37.06 ± 1.94b | 15.98 ± 2.29d | 0b | - |
| Summer savory | 100a | 100a | 100a | 91.50 ± 1.60a | 54.40 ± 0.78a | 34.86 ± 4.01 |
| Thyme white | 100a | 100a | 100a | 73.52 ± 0.64b | 50.18 ± 2.79a | 29.30 ± 2.01 |
| F9,40 = 60.81 | F9,40 = 7110 | F3,16 = 469 | F3,16 = 60.81 | F3,16 = 60.81 | F1,8 = 60.81 | |
1 mg/paper disc. 2 Means within a column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test). 3 Not tested.
Fumigant antifungal activities of Lamiaceae plant essential oils against R. solani.
| Essential Oils | Inhibition Rate (%, mean ± SE) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 1 | 5 | 2.5 | 1.25 | 0.625 | 0.3125 | |
| Basil | 100a 2 | 54.40 ± 1.04e | 20.20 ± 1.24d | 0d | - | - |
| Hyssop | 63.96 ± 1.33d | 36.64 ± 1.54e | 11.96 ± 1.14e | 0d | - | - |
| Lavender | 86.38 ± 0.64b | 62.86 ± 1.13c | 19.28 ± 1.98d | 0d | - | - |
| Marjoram | 0e | - 3 | - | - | - | - |
| Patchouli | 0e | - | - | - | - | - |
| Pennyroyal | 100a | 87.96 ± 0.90b | 36.42 ± 2.29c | 21.96 ± 0.96c | 17.70 ± 0.70c | 0c |
| Spanish sage | 73.08 ± 0.95c | 57.50 ± 0.96d | 23.52 ± 0.88d | 0d | - | - |
| Spearmint | 100a | 91.30 ± 0.89b | 44.18 ± 1.12b | 25.28 ± 1.07c | 0d | - |
| Summer savory | 100a | 100a | 100a | 91.76 ± 2.07a | 82.18 ± 1.00a | 41.98 ± 0.81b |
| Thyme white | 100a | 100a | 100a | 85.72 ± 1.17b | 63.30 ± 1.25b | 54.38 ± 2.53a |
| F9,40 = 5264 | F7,32 = 631.3 | F7,32 = 730.9 | F7,32 = 1562 | F3,16 = 1926 | F2,12 = 346.4 | |
1 mg/paper disc. 2 Means within a column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test). 3 Not tested.
Chemical composition of summer savory and thyme white plant essential oils.
| No. | Compound | Retention Index | Composition Rate (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DB-5 | Summer Savory | Thyme White | ||
| 1 | α-Pinene | 930 | 1.34 | 5.25 |
| 2 | Camphene | 946 | - 1 | 1.41 |
| 3 | 973 | 0.43 | - | |
| 4 | Myrcene | 989 | 1.81 | 3.35 |
| 5 | 1014 | 3.51 | - | |
| 6 | 1022 | 10.72 | 30.16 | |
| 7 | Limonene | 1027 | 0.63 | 1.03 |
| 8 | 1057 | 34.63 | 11.44 | |
| 9 | Linalool | 1100 | - | 9.49 |
| 10 | Terpinen-4-ol | 1179 | 0.50 | - |
| 11 | Thymol | 1290 | 0.21 | 25.32 |
| 12 | Carvacrol | 1298 | 39.84 | 3.46 |
| 13 | 1415 | 2.40 | 1.75 | |
| 14 | Caryophyllene oxide | 1577 | - | 1.15 |
| Sum | 96.04 | 93.81 | ||
1 Not detected.
Fumigant antifungal activities of constituents from summer savory and thyme white essential oils against R. quercus-mongolicae.
| Compounds | Inhibition Rate (%, mean ± SE) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 1 | 1.25 | 0.625 | 0.3125 | 0.15625 | |
| (+)-α-Pinene | 0e 2 | - 3 | - | - | - |
| (−)-α-Pinene | 0e | - | - | - | - |
| (+)-Camphene | 0e | - | - | - | - |
| (−)-Camphene | 0e | - | - | - | - |
| (+)-β-Pinene | 0e | - | - | - | - |
| (−)-β-Pinene | 0e | - | - | - | - |
| Myrcene | 0e | - | - | - | - |
| α-Terpinene | 0e | - | - | - | - |
| p-Cymene | 0e | - | - | - | - |
| (+)-Limonene | 0e | - | - | - | - |
| (−)-Limonene | 0e | - | - | - | - |
| γ-Terpinene | 0e | - | - | - | - |
| Linalool | 15.48 ± 2.25d | 0d | - | - | - |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 74.84 ± 0.89b | 59.28 ± 3.37b | 47.06 ± 1.47c | 21.74 ± 1.04c | 0b |
| Thymol | 100a | 100a | 100a | 53.30 ± 0.92a | 28.40 ± 2.45a |
| Carvacrol | 100a | 100a | 81.28 ± 2.20b | 30.68 ± 2.09b | 0b |
| β-Caryophyllene | 0e | - | - | - | - |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 46.18 ± 2.91c | 20.64 ± 2.56c | 10.38 ± 1.67d | 0d | - |
| F17,72 = 1601 | F4,20 = 578.2 | F3,16 = 534.8 | F3,16 = 310.1 | F2,12 = 134.7 | |
1 mg/paper disc. 2 Means within a column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test). 3 Not tested.
Fumigant antifungal activities of constituents from summer savory and thyme white essential oils against R. solani.
| Compounds | Inhibition Rate (%, mean ± SE) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5 1 | 1.25 | 0.625 | 0.3125 | 0.15625 | |
| (+)-α-Pinene | 47.52 ± 1.84c 2 | 33.52 ± 1.37b | 21.52 ± 1.35b | 0b | - |
| (−)-α-Pinene | 47.30 ± 1.88c | 18.38 ± 1.10c | 0d | - | - |
| (+)-Camphene | 0f | - 3 | - | - | - |
| (−)-Camphene | 0f | - | - | - | - |
| (+)-β-Pinene | 0f | - | - | - | - |
| (−)-β-Pinene | 0f | - | - | - | - |
| Myrcene | 0f | - | - | - | - |
| α-Terpinene | 0f | - | - | - | - |
| p-Cymene | 0f | - | - | - | - |
| (+)-Limonene | 22.64 ± 0.44d | 0d | - | - | - |
| (−)-Limonene | 0f | - | - | - | - |
| γ-Terpinene | 0f | - | - | - | - |
| Linalool | 42.62 ± 1.74c | 0d | - | - | - |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 71.30 ± 1.84b | 32.40 ± 1.29b | 15.28 ± 1.32c | 0b | - |
| Thymol | 100a | 100a | 100a | 78.64 ± 1.34a | 51.28 ± 6.98 |
| Carvacrol | 100a | 100a | 100a | 81.96 ± 3.23a | 55.50 ± 0.92 |
| β-Caryophyllene | 15.74 ± 1.77e | 0d | - | - | - |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 0f | - | - | - | - |
| F17,72 = 1338 | F7,32 = 2997 | F4,20 = 3331 | F3,16 = 703.9 | F1,8 = 0.359 | |
1 mg/paper disc. 2 Means within a column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test). 3 Not tested.
Figure 2Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of ROS generation. Bright mode (a) and confocal image (b) of untreated R. quercus-mongolicae. Bright mode (c) and confocal image (d) of R. quercus-mongolicae treated with thymol. Bright mode (e) and confocal image (f) of R. quercus-mongolicae treated with carvacrol. Bright mode (g) and confocal image (h) of untreated R. solani. Bright mode (i) and confocal image (j) of R. solani treated thymol. Bright mode (k) and confocal image (l) of R. solani treated with carvacrol. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 3Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of cell membrane integrity. Bright mode (a) and PI stained (b) of untreated R. quercus-mongolicae. Bright mode (c) and PI-stained (d) of R. quercus-mongolicae treated with thymol. Bright mode (e) and PI stained (f) of R. quercus-mongolicae treated with carvacrol. Bright mode (g) and PI-stained (h) of untreated R. solani. Bright mode (i) and PI-stained (j) of R. solani treated with thymol. Bright mode (k) and PI-stained (l) of R. solani treated with carvacrol. Scale bar = 50 μm.