| Literature DB >> 31623208 |
Xuemei Guo1,2,3, Zenan Lin4,5,6, Yingjun Wang7,8,9, Zhangping He10,11,12, Mengmeng Wang13,14,15, Gang Jin16,17,18.
Abstract
Polymer degradation is a common problem in the extrusion process. In this work, Raman spectroscopy, a robust, rapid, and non-destructive tool for in-line monitoring, was utilized to in-line monitor the degradation of polypropylene (PP) under multiple extrusions. Raw spectra were pretreated by chemometrics methods to extract variations of spectra and eliminate noise. The variation of Raman intensity with the increasing number of extrusions was caused by the scission of PP chains and oxidative degradation, and the variation trend of Raman intensity indicated that long chains were more likely to be damaged by the extrusion. For the quantitative analysis of degradation, the partial least square was used to build a model to predict the degree of PP degradation measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). For the calibration set, the coefficient of determination (R2) and the root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSECV) were 0.9859 and 1.2676%, and for the prediction set, R2 and the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) were 0.9752 and 1.7228%, which demonstrated the accuracy of the proposed model. The in-line Raman spectroscopy combined with the chemometrics methods was proved to be an accurate and highly effective tool, which can monitor the degradation of polymer in real time.Entities:
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; degradation; in-line monitoring; multiple extrusions; quantitative
Year: 2019 PMID: 31623208 PMCID: PMC6835389 DOI: 10.3390/polym11101698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1The high-temperature/pressure-resistant shell. (a) The physical photo, (b) the schematic diagram.
Figure 2In-line Raman spectra of polypropylene (PP) with different numbers of extrusions. (a) raw spectra, (b) spectra pretreated by baseline correction.
Vibrational modes for Raman Bands of PP [28].
| Raman Characteristic Band (cm−1) | Vibration Modes |
|---|---|
| 832 | C–C stretching, CH3 rocking |
| 967 | C–C stretching, CH3 rocking |
| 1150 | C–C stretching, CH bending |
| 1324 | CH stretching, CH2 wagging, CH3 bending |
| 1454 | CH2 bending, CH3 asymmetric bending |
Figure 3Variations and fitting curves of Raman intensity in PP main characteristic bands with different numbers of extrusions. (a) 832 cm−1, (b) 967 cm−1, (c) 1150 cm−1, (d) 1324 cm−1, (e) 1454 cm−1.
Figure 4Results of GPC in PP with different numbers of extrusions. (a) Variation of Molecular weight distribution curve, (b) variation of Mwi/Mw0. MWi is the weight average molecular weight of the i-th extrusion.
Figure 5Variations of melt-flow rate (MFR) in PP with different numbers of extrusions.
Figure 6Variations of tensile properties in PP with different numbers of extrusions.
Figure 7FTIR spectra of PP with different numbers of extrusions.
The linear correlation coefficient between the Raman intensity of the PP main characteristic band and the degree of degradation.
|
| 832 | 967 | 1150 | 1324 | 1454 |
|
| 0.936 | 0.912 | 0.955 | 0.926 | 0.958 |
Figure 8Reference versus predicted degree of PP degradation based on the partial least squares (PLS) model of the calibration and prediction set. RMSECV = the standard error of cross-validation; RMSEP = the standard error of prediction.