Literature DB >> 3162257

Chemomechanical caries removal--a clinical evaluation.

J H Zinck1, P McInnes-Ledoux, C Capdeboscq, R Weinberg.   

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the efficacy and convenience of decayed dentine removal with N-monochloro-DL-2 aminobutyrate (CARIDEX) in all classes of cavities. Fifty-seven patients, each with two teeth having similarly sized carious cavities, participated in this study. One cavity in each patient was treated with the chemomechanical CARIDEX technique and the other cavity was treated with conventional mechanical drilling. The cavities were restored with either amalgam, composite or glass ionomer restorative materials. The time taken for access and caries removal was noted and the efficacy of caries removal with each technique was evaluated. The chemomechanical caries removal technique was effective in removing 90-100% of decayed dentine in 98% of the cavities treated. Multiple regression adjusted access and caries removal time to account for volume of caries removed. This adjusted time was operator dependent, and ranged from 4 to 10 minutes longer for CARIDEX than for the conventional technique. Ninety-three per cent of patients preferred the chemomechanical method of caries removal over the conventional technique (highly significant P less than 0.001). Even though the chemomechanical removal of caries is slower than the conventional technique, the efficacy of CARIDEX and its high patient acceptance provides a viable alternative method for dentinal caries removal in all classes of cavities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3162257     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1988.tb00143.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of the chemomechanical removal of dentine caries in vivo with a new modified Carisolv gel.

Authors:  Solveig Fure; P Lingström
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Caries Removal by Chemomechanical (Carisolv™) vs. Rotary Drill: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Viral P Maru; B S Shakuntala; C Nagarathna
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-12-31

3.  Evaluation of Microhardness of Residual Dentin in Primary Molars Following Caries Removal with Conventional and Chemomechanical Techniques: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  A Shihab Anwar; R Krishna Kumar; V Arun Prasad Rao; N Venugopal Reddy; V J Reshma
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2017-11

4.  A comparative microbiological study to assess caries excavation by conventional rotary method and a chemo-mechanical method.

Authors:  Rajesh T Anegundi; Shruthi B Patil; Viresh Tegginmani; Sheetal D Shetty
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-10

5.  Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions.

Authors:  Falk Schwendicke; Tanya Walsh; Thomas Lamont; Waraf Al-Yaseen; Lars Bjørndal; Janet E Clarkson; Margherita Fontana; Jesus Gomez Rossi; Gerd Göstemeyer; Colin Levey; Anne Müller; David Ricketts; Mark Robertson; Ruth M Santamaria; Nicola Pt Innes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-19

6.  Effect of two different chemomechanical caries removal agents on dentin microhardness: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Surendar Ramamoorthi; Malli Sureshbabu Nivedhitha; P Pranav Vanajassun
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-09

7.  Comparative Evaluation of Chemo-mechanical and Rotary-mechanical Methods in Removal of Caries with Respect to Time Consumption and Pain Perception in Pediatrc Dental Patients.

Authors:  Ashish Katiyar; Sukriti Gupta; Kirtija Gupta; Karuna Sharma; Bhoomika Tripathi; Nitin Sharma
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.