| Literature DB >> 31622569 |
Kaísa Trovão Diniz1, José Eulálio Cabral Filho1, Rafael Moura Miranda2, Geisy Maria Souza Lima3, Natália Priscila Dos Santos Figueredo3, Kalline Fernanda Nunes de Araújo3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To verify the short-term influence of the kangaroo position (KP) on the electromyography activity of preterm newborns.Entities:
Keywords: Child development; Desenvolvimento infantil; Electromyography; Eletromiografia; Infant, premature; Kangaroo mother care method; Método mãe canguru; Neonato, prematuro
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31622569 PMCID: PMC9432240 DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2019.10.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pediatr (Rio J) ISSN: 0021-7557 Impact factor: 2.990
Figure 1Flowchart of capture and monitoring of newborns (CONSORT).
Clinical and biological characteristics of the newborns.
| Kangaroo group | Control group | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age (weeks), mean (± SD) | 31.93 (±2.18) | 31.91 (±2.02) | 0.97 |
| Corrected age at the time of evaluation, mean (± SD) | 33.83 (±2.31) | 33.93 (±1.68) | 0.87 |
| Males (%) | 42.85 | 60.86 | 1 |
| Females (%) | 57.14 | 39.13 | 1 |
| Birth weight, mean (±SD) | 1531.19 (±391.64) | 1599.13 (±307.58) | 0.52 |
| Apgar score at 5 min, median, (P25; P75) | 9.00 | 9.00 | 0.47 |
SD, standard deviation; P, percentile.
Comparison of the kangaroo group vs. control group.
Mann-Whitney U-test.
Student’s t-test.
chi-squared test.
Electromyographic activity (RMS%) of the biceps brachii of preterm newborns submitted and not submitted to the kangaroo position at different moments.
| Times | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | T0 | T1 | T2 | p | |
| Kangaroo | 10.8 (±2.4) | 16.1 (±3.8) | 19.3 (±4.9) | F | <0.001 |
| Control | 12.7 | 13.0 | 13.0 | H | 0.84 |
, mean, SD, standard deviation; Md, median; P, percentile; T0, T1, and T2, first, second, and third moments of electromyographic recording.
RMS%, root mean square, normalized.
Kangaroo group: ANOVA with repeated measurements (F) and multiple comparisons (Tukey test): T0vs. T1 (p < 0.05), T0vs. T2 (p < 0.05), T1vs. T2 (p < 0.05).
Control group: Kruskal–Wallis test (H).
Electromyographic activity (RMS%) of the hamstrings of preterm newborns submitted and not submitted to the kangaroo position at different moments.
| Times | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | T0 | T1 | T2 | p | |
| Kangaroo | 13.1 | 18.1 | 21.5 | H | 0004 |
| Control | 13.0 | 11.8 | 11.6 | H | 0.54 |
Md, median; P, percentile; T0, T1, and T2, first, second, and third moments of electromyographic recording.
Kangaroo group, Kruskal–Wallis test (H) and multiple comparisons (Dunn test): T0vs. T2 (p < 0.05).
RMS%, root mean square, normalized.
Control group, Kruskal-Wallis test (H).