| Literature DB >> 31622226 |
Amin Derakhshanfar1,2, Javad Moayedi1,2, Mahjoob Vahedi2, Abouzar Valizadeh2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Arum conophalloides (A. conophalloides) is a wild edible delicate plant, widely used in traditional medicine.Entities:
Keywords: ALT; AST; Arum conophalloides; HDL; hepatotoxicity; histopathological; miR-122; rat.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31622226 PMCID: PMC7366011 DOI: 10.2174/2211536608666191016142400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microrna
The list of gene-specific primers used in real-time PCR assay.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| RT primer | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACCAAACA | MI0000891 | |
| Forward primer | GTATACTGGAGTGTGACAATG | ||
| Reverse primer | GTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT | ||
| RT primer | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACCGCCAA | MI0000844 | |
| Forward primer | GTATACTAGCAGCACGTAAAT | ||
| Reverse primer | GTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT | ||
| RT primer | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACGAAATC | MI0000961 | |
| Forward primer | GTATACACCTGGCATACAATG | ||
| Reverse primer | GTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT | ||
| RT primer | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACAACTAT | MI0000827 | |
| Forward primer | GTATACTGAGGTAGTAGGTTG | ||
| Reverse primer | GTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT | ||
| RT primer | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT | K00784 | |
| Forward primer | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | ||
| Reverse primer | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT |
Body-weight and the serum level of biochemical indices in each experimental group.
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 212.3 ± 5.1 | 219.6 ± 3.7 | 220.1 ± 5.2 | 218.8 ± 5.4 | 220.2 ± 3.3 | 222.1 ± 2.3 | |
| 148.6 ± 8.3 | 180.1 ± 43.3 | 250.6 ± 97.1 | 271.4 ± 59.9 | 237.8 ± 130.3 | 213.1 ± 2.3 | |
| 79.1 ± 5.2 | 100.8 ± 28.5 | 80.8 ± 18.7 | 78.6 ± 44.2 | 83.1 ± 33.6 | 83.1 ± 13.8 | |
| 72.2 ± 8.1 | 67.4 ± 10.7 | 57.6 ± 14.9 | 48.4 ± 5.2 | 49.8 ± 16.2 | 59.1 ± 3.4 | |
| 30.1 ± 2.4 | 30.4 ± 1.1 | 28.2 ± 6.1 | 25.4 ± 7.2 | 26.5 ± 7.5 | ||
| 19.1 ± 4.1 | 24.8 ± 3.7 | 19.1 ± 3.6 | 20.6 ± 3.4 | 19.5 ± 0.7 | ||
| 23.1 ± 2.3 | 24.4 ± 3.7 | 21.6 ± 1.3 | 26.8 ± 3.4 | 22.1 ± 3.3 | 21.1 ± 1.1 | |
| 0.71 ± 0.09 | 0.58 ± 0.08 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 0.62 ± 0.19 | 0.55 ± 0.05 | |
| 118.8 ± 11.8 | 138.4 ± 20.4 | 139.2 ± 15.5 | 147.2 ± 12.6 | 148.4 ± 3.5 | 129.5 ± 29.4 | |
| 62.6 ± 4.7 | 65.8 ± 6.8 | 59.8 ± 5.7 | 58.2 ± 13.1 | |||
| 820.6 ± 145.1 | 733.2 ± 120.1 | 703.1 ± 223.4 | 737.1 ± 113.2 | |||
Asterisks show significant differences (P<0.05) compared to control group.
Results of circulatory miR-122 expression in the Arum conophalloides extract-treated groups in comparison to control (Figs. 3 and 4).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G2 | Aqueous | 200 mg/kg | 1.872 | 0.782-8.424 | 0.230 |
| G3 | 400 mg/kg | 10.416 | 2.028-27.309 | 0.009 | |
| G4 | Hydroalcoholic | 200 mg/kg | 0.955 | 0.760-1.228 | 0.792 |
| G5 | 400 mg/kg | 1.113 | 0.927-1.464 | 0.794 |