Literature DB >> 31621944

Two-stage enrichment clinical trial design with adjustment for misclassification in predictive biomarkers.

Yong Lin1,2, Weichung J Shih1,2, Shou-En Lu1,2.   

Abstract

A two-stage enrichment design is a type of adaptive design, which extends a stratified design with a futility analysis on the marker negative cohort at the first stage, and the second stage can be either a targeted design with only the marker positive stratum, or still the stratified design with both marker strata, depending on the result of the interim futility analysis. In this paper, we consider the situation where the marker assay and the classification rule are possibly subject to error. We derive the sequential tests for the global hypothesis as well as the component tests for the overall cohort and the marker-positive cohort. We discuss the power analysis with the control of the type I error rate and show the adverse impact of the misclassification on the powers. We also show the enhanced power of the two-stage enrichment over the one-stage design and illustrate with examples of the recent successful development of immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  composite hypothesis; enrichment design; predictive biomarker; sensitivity and specificity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31621944      PMCID: PMC6842057          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  12 in total

1.  Adaptive signature design: an adaptive clinical trial design for generating and prospectively testing a gene expression signature for sensitive patients.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Richard Simon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Decision rules for subgroup selection based on a predictive biomarker.

Authors:  Johannes Krisam; Meinhard Kieser
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  A general framework of marker design with optimal allocation to assess clinical utility.

Authors:  Liansheng Tang; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Relative efficiency of precision medicine designs for clinical trials with predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  Weichung Joe Shih; Yong Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  On study designs and hypotheses for clinical trials with predictive biomarkers.

Authors:  Weichung J Shih; Yong Lin
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward B Garon; Naiyer A Rizvi; Rina Hui; Natasha Leighl; Ani S Balmanoukian; Joseph Paul Eder; Amita Patnaik; Charu Aggarwal; Matthew Gubens; Leora Horn; Enric Carcereny; Myung-Ju Ahn; Enriqueta Felip; Jong-Seok Lee; Matthew D Hellmann; Omid Hamid; Jonathan W Goldman; Jean-Charles Soria; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Ruth Z Rutledge; Jin Zhang; Jared K Lunceford; Reshma Rangwala; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Charlotte Roach; Kenneth Emancipator; Leena Gandhi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; Paul Baas; Dong-Wan Kim; Enriqueta Felip; José L Pérez-Gracia; Ji-Youn Han; Julian Molina; Joo-Hang Kim; Catherine Dubos Arvis; Myung-Ju Ahn; Margarita Majem; Mary J Fidler; Gilberto de Castro; Marcelo Garrido; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Yue Shentu; Ellie Im; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Edward B Garon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Multistage adaptive biomarker-directed targeted design for randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhong Gao; Anindya Roy; Ming Tan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Martin Reck; Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu; Andrew G Robinson; Rina Hui; Tibor Csőszi; Andrea Fülöp; Maya Gottfried; Nir Peled; Ali Tafreshi; Sinead Cuffe; Mary O'Brien; Suman Rao; Katsuyuki Hotta; Melanie A Leiby; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Yue Shentu; Reshma Rangwala; Julie R Brahmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Approaches to evaluation of treatment effect in randomized clinical trials with genomic subset.

Authors:  Sue-Jane Wang; Robert T O'Neill; H M James Hung
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.