Bertha F Polegato1, Leonardo A M Zornoff1. 1. Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) - Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - Departamento de Clínica Médica, Botucatu, SP - Brazil.
Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of mortality and the most resource-consuming
health pathology in industrialized countries.[1] In the United States, it is believed that more than 12 million
individuals have ischemic heart disease.[2]It is estimated that approximately 1 million cases of acute coronary syndrome occur
annually in the United States, demonstrating that this syndrome occurs in epidemic
proportions.[2] Few pathologies
have evolved as radically as AMI, with a marked reduction in mortality as a result of
changes in treatment over the past 30 years, particularly cardiac reperfusion.[1,3]In fact, with the introduction of myocardial reperfusion, 30-day mortality has been
reduced from about 14% to about 3% in several clinical trials.[3] In addition to this benefit, early and sustained
reperfusion results in lower cardiac morbidity, lower incidence of ventricular
fibrillation and tachycardia, conduction disorders and less development of congestive
heart failure.[1]Despite the unequivocal benefit, an undesirable event of this strategy is the phenomenon
of reperfusion injury. This phenomenon is defined as the injury that occurs as a direct
result of coronary blood flow restoration. This phenomenon may have important clinical
implications, because it may be responsible for 30-50% of the final infarct
size.[4] Thus, several strategies
have been studied with the objective of attenuating the ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)
injury phenomenon.In this issue of the Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, Imani et al.[5] assessed the cardioprotective effects of
acute physical stress against I/R injury, through the activation of the sympathetic
nervous system. They used the isolated heart preparation, with the Langendorff
apparatus. The hearts were subjected to 30 minutes of ischemia, followed by 120 minutes
of reperfusion. Physical stress prior to the I/R improved left ventricular developed
pressure and reduced infarct size when compared with the I/R alone.[5] In addition, chemical sympathectomy
before physical stress eliminated the protective effect of physical stress on
I/R-induced cardiac damages. The authors concluded that the presence of the sympathetic
nervous system is necessary for the beneficial effects of acute physical stress on I/R
injury.[5]It is important to emphasize that knowledge about the pathophysiological mechanisms
involved in I/R injury is critical, as this allows the creation of therapeutic
strategies to attenuate or prevent cardiac damage. On the other hand, we must consider
that cardioprotection strategies in I/R models are the main model used to exemplify the
difficulties of translational medicine, since positive results from experimental studies
are obfuscated by the fact that to date, cardioprotection strategies in clinical studies
have shown negative results.[6]Therefore, although provocative, the role of the sympathetic system as a therapeutic
option in the I/R injury remains to be confirmed in future studies.
Authors: Borja Ibanez; Stefan James; Stefan Agewall; Manuel J Antunes; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Héctor Bueno; Alida L P Caforio; Filippo Crea; John A Goudevenos; Sigrun Halvorsen; Gerhard Hindricks; Adnan Kastrati; Mattie J Lenzen; Eva Prescott; Marco Roffi; Marco Valgimigli; Christoph Varenhorst; Pascal Vranckx; Petr Widimský Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-01-07 Impact factor: 29.983