| Literature DB >> 31621655 |
Paula Sáez-Espinosa1,2, Natalia Huerta-Retamal1, Laura Robles-Gómez1, Manuel Avilés3, Jon Aizpurua4, Irene Velasco1,5, Alejandro Romero1, María José Gómez-Torres1,6.
Abstract
A cascade of dramatic physiological events is linked to the sperm acrosome reaction and binding to the oocyte's zona pellucida during human sperm capacitation. However, structural and functional sperm changes during capacitation currently remain poorly defined. Here, we performed a multibiomarker approach based on the utilization of sperm concentration, motility, viability, morphology, acrosome reaction, tyrosine phosphorylation, DNA fragmentation, and lectin-binding sites to analyze the impact caused by swim-up selection times (uncapacitated, 1 h capacitated, and 4 h capacitated) on sperm function and structure in normozoospermic samples. We found that a 4 h swim-up capacitation increased sperm quality, because a large number of cells with normal morphology and lower DNA fragmentation rates were recovered. Furthermore, the long-term capacitation induced a higher percentage of cells with tyrosine phosphorylation of the principal piece as well as a redistribution of lectin-binding sites. Overall, the multivariate biomarkers analyzed showed a less variable distribution on spermatozoa recovered after 4 h capacitation than that with the shorter capacitation time. These findings stress the importance of capacitation time as a relevant factor in sperm quality with potential biological reproductive implications both for basic research and in assisted reproduction techniques.Entities:
Keywords: DNA fragmentation; acrosome reaction; capacitation; glycocalyx; lectin-binding sites; membrane integrity; protein phosphorylation; sperm selection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31621655 PMCID: PMC7523607 DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_104_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Androl ISSN: 1008-682X Impact factor: 3.285
Factor loadings corresponding to the first two PCs based on sperm biomarkers within uncapacitated and swim-up capacitated samples
| Concentration | −0.833* | −0.341* |
| Total motility | 0.685* | 0.427* |
| Viability | 0.611* | 0.326* |
| Normal morphology | 0.606* | 0.147 |
| Acrosome reaction | ||
| Spontaneous | 0.405* | −0.001 |
| Calcium ionophore | 0.055 | −0.055 |
| Tyrosine phosphorylation | ||
| ES | 0.713* | 0.493* |
| PP | 0.763* | 0.268 |
| ES + PP | 0.561* | 0.407* |
| DNA fragmentation | −0.670* | −0.146 |
| Sugar-binding patterns, AAA lectin | ||
| P1 | 0.748* | −0.319* |
| P2 | 0.451* | 0.331* |
| P3 | 0.051 | −0.258 |
| P4 | −0.867* | −0.271 |
| P5 | −0.326* | 0.622* |
| Sugar-binding patterns, ConA lectin | ||
| P1 | −0.122 | −0.601* |
| P2 | 0.331* | 0.196 |
| P3 | 0.023 | −0.295 |
| P4 | 0.097 | −0.196 |
| P5 | −0.226 | 0.697* |
| Sugar-binding patterns, PNA lectin | ||
| P1 | 0.759* | −0.479* |
| P3 | −0.197 | −0.141 |
| P5 | −0.702* | 0.590* |
| Sugar-binding patterns, WGA lectin | ||
| P1 | −0.430* | −0.558* |
| P3 | 0.136 | −0.228 |
| P4 | 0.457* | 0.398* |
| P5 | −0.257 | 0.380* |
*Correlation (Pearson’s r) at P<0.05. ES: equatorial segment; PP: principal piece; AAA: Aleuria aurantia agglutinin; ConA: Concanavalin A; PNA: Peanut agglutinin; WGA: Wheat germ agglutinin; PCs: Principal component 1 (PC1) and 2 (PC2)
Descriptive and statistical results of sperm biomarkers in uncapacitated and swim-up capacitated conditions
| Concentration (106 ml-1) | 54.7±26.2 | 8.6±5.9a | 8.9±3.5b |
| Total motility (%) | 70.9±14.8 | 97.5±1.9a | 96.3±1.5b |
| Viability (%) | 82.5±15.1 | 96.7±2.3a | 95.9±1.6b |
| Normal morphology (%) | 9.7±6.2 | 19.3±9.2 | 26.6±13.8b |
| Acrosomal reaction (%) | |||
| Spontaneous | 12.0±6.7 | 16.5±9.5 | 23.8±8.2b |
| Calcium ionophore | − | 80.9±6.8 | 81.2±6.9 |
| Tyrosine phosphorylation (%) | |||
| ES | 1.5±3.2 | 16.5±6.0a | 18.1±7.2b |
| PP | 3.2±1.9 | 17.2±5.6a | 25.3±4.5b,c |
| ES + PP | 0.0±0.0 | 5.5±4.4a | 9.7±7.2b |
| DNA fragmentation (%) | 14.0±12.7 | 3.3±4.0 | 2.0±2.3b |
| Sugar-binding patterns, AAA lectin (%) | |||
| P1 | 28.7±16.2 | 43.3±20.1 | 59.3±15.4b |
| P2 | 6.0±7.3 | 32.4±17.6a | 21.1±10.6b |
| P3 | 4.0±6.6 | 2.3±6.2 | 2.2±5.7 |
| P4 | 45.2±15.1 | 4.8±5.8a | 3.6±4.8b |
| P5 | 16.0±11.8 | 17.0±18.3 | 13.6±11.1 |
| Sugar-binding patterns, ConA lectin (%) | |||
| P1 | 55.5±16.9 | 49.0±24.0 | 38.9±20.2 |
| P2 | 26.0±13.9 | 26.4±14.9 | 45.0±17.0b,c |
| P3 | 3.4±4.5 | 1.3±4.0 | 2.7±4.8 |
| P4 | 4.6±10.7 | 3.2±5.8 | 7.9±4.7 |
| P5 | 10.2±8.5 | 19.8±26.5 | 5.3±6.6 |
| Sugar-binding patterns, PNA lectin (%) | |||
| P1 | 45.8±29.9 | 67.8±21.8 | 68.0±21.6 |
| P3 | 19.9±15.9 | 9.8±10.0 | 17.9±13.3 |
| P5 | 34.2±30.9 | 22.3±22.6 | 14.0±14.0 |
| Sugar-binding patterns, WGA lectin (%) | |||
| P1 | 59.7±12.9 | 41.3±11.2a | 35.1±7.3b |
| P3 | 7.4±9.0 | 4.5±6.3 | 13.4±10.9 |
| P4 | 23.1±10.3 | 47.4±12.0a | 42.1±17.0b |
| P5 | 9.9±10.7 | 6.7±9.1 | 9.2±10.2 |
Letters a, b, and c indicate significant differences at P<0.05 level according to Kruskal–Wallis test between capacitation times: aT0 versus T1, bT0 versus T4, and cT1 versus T4. ES: equatorial segment; PP: principal piece; AAA: Aleuria aurantia agglutinin; ConA: Concanavalin A; PNA: Peanut agglutinin; WGA: Wheat germ agglutinin; s.d.: standard deviation