| Literature DB >> 31620288 |
Emilio Rendón-Franco1,2, Osvaldo López-Díaz2, Oscar Rodríguez-Espinosa1, Nora Rojas-Serranía2, Roberto Rodríguez-Cabo-Mercado3, Maria M B Moreno-Altamirano1, Claudia I Muñoz-García2, Claudia Villanueva-García4, Alvaro Aguilar-Setién5.
Abstract
Coatis (Nasua narica) and raccoons (Procyon lotor) potentially play an important role in zoonotic diseases because they may carry pathogens and can transmit them to humans. To date, our understanding of the immune function of these two carnivores is deficient. The aim of this study was to compare the number of leucocyte subtypes and the phagocytic capacity between the coati and the raccoon. Blood samples were collected, and leucocyte subtypes were characterized and counted by flow cytometry and microscopy, respectively. Phagocytosis was analysed by kinetic assay. Differences in leucocytes between these two species were found; the total count of neutrophils was higher in raccoons than in coatis, but lymphocytes and eosinophils were higher in coatis than in raccoons. Antigen reduction was more rapid for the coatis. However, raccoons had a higher efficient endocytic process than coatis. This study provides the basis for understanding the procyonid immune system, which informs conservation, particularly since some procyonids are imperilled.Entities:
Keywords: Nasua narica; Procyon lotor; carnivore; leucocyte; phagocytosis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31620288 PMCID: PMC6788493 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coz050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conserv Physiol ISSN: 2051-1434 Impact factor: 3.079
Figure 1Representative dot plot of flow cytometry of size versus complexity. Red dots (R0) represent monocytes, green dots (R2) granulocytes and blue dots (R1) lymphocytes. The lines around dots denote the gates of the leucocyte subpopulation
Leucocyte differential counts
| Coatis | Raccoons |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leucocytes | 9.45 (±0.44) | 12.14 (±1.78) |
|
| Neutrophils | 4.39 (±0.39) | 10.19 (±1.50) |
|
| Lymphocytes | 3.71 (±0.28) | 1.55 (±0.34) |
|
| Monocytes | 0.40 (±0.06) | 0.30 (±0.07) |
|
| Eosinophils | 0.93 (±0.11) | 0.09 (±0.06) |
|
| Basophils | 0.01 (±0.01) | 0 (na) |
|
All counts were expressed in cell ×109/L. SE = standard error; na = not applicable
Figure 2A. Proportions of cells in phagocytosis. B. Average of phagocyted yeast. C. Proportions of cells with ingested yeast. D. Proportions of cells with reduced yeast. E. Proportions of cells with degraded yeast. Asterisks show significant differences between species (P < 0.05), and error bars represent the standard error.