Ricardo Faria-Almeida1, Inesa Astramskaite-Januseviciene2, Algirdas Puisys3, Francisco Correia1. 1. Department of Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine, Porto University of Dental MedicinePortugal. 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, KaunasLithuania. 3. VIC clinic, private practice, VilniusLithuania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess quantitatively and qualitatively the influence of two different factors: membranes and soft tissue graft influence for the extraction socket preservation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A wide-ranging electronic search was performed in six databases up to 30 of November 2018 in order to identify all the clinical and randomized clinical trials performed in humans published with no data restriction. The inclusion criteria were extraction socket preservation with and without membranes or a soft tissue graft in a intact socket with at least six months of follow-up, have more than 12 patients or treat more than 12 sites per group and evaluated at least one of the primary outcomes measures (radiographic measures histological assessment, clinical measures). RESULTS: From an initial search of 1524 studies only 6 papers fulfil the inclusion and exclusion criterions. All the six selected papers, presented a wide heterogeneity of treatments used, evaluated variables and observation period that made impossible to recommend any specific techniques and/or material to achieve better results. The limited data found suggest that the used of membrane reveals to achieve better results. It wasn't possible to observe in any clinical trial that compares the used of soft tissue graft. CONCLUSIONS: New trials need to be performed in order to identify what specific techniques and/or materials are better to decrease the reabsorption of the socket after tooth extraction. Clinical trials designed to understand when/how the soft tissues grafts influence at the socket preservation is needed.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess quantitatively and qualitatively the influence of two different factors: membranes and soft tissue graft influence for the extraction socket preservation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A wide-ranging electronic search was performed in six databases up to 30 of November 2018 in order to identify all the clinical and randomized clinical trials performed in humans published with no data restriction. The inclusion criteria were extraction socket preservation with and without membranes or a soft tissue graft in a intact socket with at least six months of follow-up, have more than 12 patients or treat more than 12 sites per group and evaluated at least one of the primary outcomes measures (radiographic measures histological assessment, clinical measures). RESULTS: From an initial search of 1524 studies only 6 papers fulfil the inclusion and exclusion criterions. All the six selected papers, presented a wide heterogeneity of treatments used, evaluated variables and observation period that made impossible to recommend any specific techniques and/or material to achieve better results. The limited data found suggest that the used of membrane reveals to achieve better results. It wasn't possible to observe in any clinical trial that compares the used of soft tissue graft. CONCLUSIONS: New trials need to be performed in order to identify what specific techniques and/or materials are better to decrease the reabsorption of the socket after tooth extraction. Clinical trials designed to understand when/how the soft tissues grafts influence at the socket preservation is needed.
Authors: Mario Aimetti; Valeria Manavella; Lisa Corano; Elena Ercoli; Cristina Bignardi; Federica Romano Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 5.977
Authors: Karin Wolleb; Irena Sailer; Andrea Thoma; Giorgio Menghini; Christoph H F Hammerle Journal: Int J Prosthodont Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.681
Authors: Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-07-21
Authors: V Lekovic; P M Camargo; P R Klokkevold; M Weinlaender; E B Kenney; B Dimitrijevic; M Nedic Journal: J Periodontol Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 6.993
Authors: Massimo Del Fabbro; Grazia Tommasato; Paolo Pesce; Andrea Ravidà; Shahnawaz Khijmatgar; Anton Sculean; Matthew Galli; Donato Antonacci; Luigi Canullo Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Fernando Suárez López Del Amo; Ricardo Faria-Almeida; Bruno Leitão Almeida; Inesa Astramskaite-Januseviciene; Shayan Barootchi; Tiago Borges; André Correia; Francisco Correia; Jad Majzoub; Miguel Padial-Molina; Mindaugas Pranskunas; Algirdas Puisys; Ausra Ramanauskaite; Andrea Ravida; Thomas Starch-Jensen; Mustafa Tattan Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Res Date: 2019-09-05
Authors: Antonello Falco; Francesco Bataccia; Lorenzo Vittorini Orgeas; Federico Perfetti; Mariangela Basile; Roberta Di Pietro Journal: Biology (Basel) Date: 2021-03-25