| Literature DB >> 31620178 |
Elham Ghasemi1, Shila Nayebifar2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Considered the increasing rate of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and a positive relationship between prevalence of CVDs and obesity, the goal of the present study was to investigate the effects of green tea supplement and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on lipid panel, fibrinogen, and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) in overweight women.Entities:
Keywords: Catechin; fibrinogen; high-intensity interval training; lipid panel; overweight
Year: 2019 PMID: 31620178 PMCID: PMC6788331 DOI: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_499_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Res Med Sci ISSN: 1735-1995 Impact factor: 1.852
Figure 1CONSORT flow diagram of the study
High intensity interval exercise protocol
| Weeks | Activity time (s) | Active relaxation time (s) | Intervals | Protocol length of time (min) | Total activity time (main activity, warming-up, and cooling-down) (min) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 m shuttle run protocol | The first and the second | 30 | 30 | 4 | 4 | 24 |
| The third and the fourth | 30 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 25 | |
| The fifth and the sixth | 30 | 30 | 6 | 6 | 26 | |
| The seventh and the eighth | 30 | 30 | 7 | 7 | 27 | |
| The ninth and the tenth | 30 | 30 | 8 | 8 | 28 |
Figure 2Schematic Illustration of the Experimental Design. B1 = blood sampling pretraining; B2 = blood sampling at posttraining
Baseline comparison of demographic characteristics
| Variables | Mean±SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training + green tea ( | Training + placebo ( | Green tea ( | ||
| Age (years) | 22.47±3.32 | 23.58±2.23 | 21.06±2.65 | 0.87 |
| Height (cm) | 160±0.12 | 161.04±0.04 | 160±0.35 | 0.94 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.15±1.47 | 27.32±1.27 | 28.03±1.04 | 0.06 |
BMI=Body mass index; ANOVA=Analysis of variance; SD=Standard deviation
Comparison of fat percentage, weight, maximal oxygen consumption, and biochemical mean changes in three studied groups after 10 weeks of green tea administration and high intensity interval training
| Variables | Groups | Measurement time | Within group ( | Difference in change post-pre (%) | Between group ( | Groups comparisons | Mean difference±SE | Tukey ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest | Posttest | ||||||||
| TG (mg/dl) | Training + green tea | 140.03±46.67 | 103.38±41.98 | 0.001*** | −26.17 | 0.001† | Training + green tea versus training + placebo | −12.16±1.08 | 0.04* |
| Training + placebo | 119.41±40.53 | 94.92±36.27 | 0.03* | −20.50 | Training + green tea versus green tea | −19.22±1.32 | 0.001* | ||
| Green tea | 135.69±56.07 | 118.26±32.14 | 0.02* | −12.84 | Training + placebo versus green tea | −7.06±0.65 | 0.04* | ||
| LDL (mg/dl) | Training + green tea | 104.12±19.42 | 89.32±18.52 | 0.006** | −14.21 | 0.02† | Training + green tea versus training + placebo | −4.82±0.11 | 0.03* |
| Training + placebo | 99.71±18.16 | 89.73±19.34 | 0.01** | −10.09 | Training + green tea versus green tea | −5.51±0.12 | 0.002* | ||
| Green tea | 113.53±24.36 | 104.24±20.92 | 0.04* | −8.18 | Training + placebo versus green tea | −0.69±0.05 | 0.31 | ||
| HDL (mg/dl)# | Training + green tea | 55 (42.25-60.75) | 63.5 (53.5-6 9.75) | 0.012** | 21.85 | 0.01†† | Training + green tea versus training + placebo | −2.16±0.23 | 0.01* |
| Training + placebo | 46.5 (39-60.25) | 58 (49-68.75) | 0.012** | 19.14 | Training + green tea versus green tea | −6.31±0.12 | 0.001* | ||
| Green tea | 44.5 (39.25-58) | 50 (48.5-62) | 0.06 | 10.66 | Training + placebo versus green tea | −4.15±0.34 | 0.002* | ||
| Fibrinogen (mg/dl) | Training + green tea | 233.50±19.30 | 201.40±20.20 | 0.03* | −13.74 | 0.001† | Training + green tea versus training + placebo | −4.71±0.34 | 0.001* |
| Training + placebo | 240.60±21.30 | 217.40±19.60 | 0.02* | −9.64 | Training + green tea versus green tea | −5.94±0.64 | 0.001* | ||
| Green tea | 238.40±18.90 | 212.20±17.70 | 0.04* | −10.98 | Training + placebo versus green tea | −1.01±0.01 | 0.99 | ||
| Fat percentage (%) | Training + green tea | 34.12±1.80 | 27.12±1.45 | 0.001*** | −20.51 | 0.001† | Training + green tea versus training + placebo | −3.01±0.76 | 0.001* |
| Training + placebo | 33.57±1.39 | 29.57±1.90 | 0.001*** | −11.91 | Training + green tea versus green tea | −5.14±0.35 | 0.001* | ||
| Green tea | 34.28±1.38 | 32.42±1.27 | 0.04* | −5.42 | Training + placebo versus green tea | −2.14±0.05 | 0.001* | ||
| Weight (kg) | Training + green tea | 70.56±6.19 | 65.83±6.27 | 0.001*** | −6.70 | 0.001† | Training + green tea versus training + placebo | −2.42±0.55 | 0.001* |
| Training + placebo | 72.18±3.51 | 69.88±3.79 | 0.03* | −3.18 | Training + green tea versus green tea | −3.22±0.32 | 0.001* | ||
| Green tea | 73.45±8.44 | 71.95±6.37 | 0.04* | −2.04 | Training + placebo versus green tea | −0.80±0.03 | 0.047* | ||
| VO2 max (ml/kg/min)# | Training + green tea | 24 (20.25-27.75) | 29 (25.5-30.75) | 0.007** | 15.91 | 0.001† | Training + green tea versus training + placebo | −2.19±0.43 | 0.02* |
| Training + placebo | 25.5 (18.25-27.75) | 27.5 (20.75-29.75) | 0.007** | 7.62 | Training + green tea versus green tea | −2.16±0.09 | 0.03* | ||
| Green tea | 26.5 (18.25-28) | 28 (20-30) | 0.06 | 7.5 | Training + placebo versus green tea | −0.43±0.05 | 0.032* | ||
*P≤0.05; **P≤0.01; ***P≤0.001significant difference compared to pretest; †P≤0.05 significant difference between three groups. Within group P value: Paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, Between group P value: ANCOVA; #Presented as medians (25th-75th) percentiles and all others were presented as means±SDs. SE=Standard error; VO2 max=Maximal oxygen consumption; TG=Triglyceride; HDL=High-density lipoprotein; LDL=Low-density lipoprotein; ANCOVA=Analysis of covariance; SDs=standard deviations