| Literature DB >> 31620037 |
Ying Xiong1, Zhewu Wang2,3, M Rita I Young1,4.
Abstract
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been suggested to be associated with an inflammatory immune state, although few studies have examined peripheral blood lymphocytes in subjects that have PTSD and compared immune parameters to subjects that experienced similar trauma, but did not develop PTSD. An exploratory approach was undertaken to compare phenotypes of blood CD4+ and CD8+ subpopulations and their expression of immune mediators between Veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars who experienced similar levels of combat, with some developing PTSD and other not. The results of this study did not demonstrate evidence of enhanced immune activation of peripheral blood lymphocytes. Instead, the results showed a decline in expression of the pro-inflammatory mediator IFN-γ and the cytotoxin granzyme B in CD8+ subpopulations from Veterans with PTSD. While the reductions in expression of IFN-γ and granzyme B did not reach statistical significance when examining the CD8+ cell population as a whole, the declines were significant when examining the CD8+ cell subpopulations, with different mediators being reduced in different subpopulations. The most prominent decline in IFN-γ expression was by the unconventional CD8dimCD3+ T-cell subpopulation that has been associated with chronic infection and immune fatigue. The decline in granzyme B was most prominent in the NK-containing CD8dimCD3- subpopulation of Tcells. Consequently, analysis of blood leukocyte subpopulations, rather than bulk lymphocyte groups, reveals a dampened level of immune reactivity in combat-exposed Veterans with PTSD compared to combat-exposed Veterans without PTSD.Entities:
Keywords: T-cell; granzyme B; immune; interferon-γ; post-traumatic stress disorder; veterans
Year: 2019 PMID: 31620037 PMCID: PMC6759996 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00693
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Descriptive information on research subjects.
| Controls | PTSD | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 13) | (n = 19) | ||
| Age | 45.6 ± 9.5 | 36.5 ± 6.8 | 0.007 |
| Gender | 11 (84.6%) | 12 (63.2%) | NS |
| Race | 4 (30.8%) | 10 (52.6%) | NS |
| Depression | 4 (30.8%) | 6 (31.6%) | NS |
| Prior alcohol use disorder | 2 (15.4%) | 2 (10.5%) | NS |
| Immunological disorders (total) | 4 (30.8%) | 6 (31.6%) | NS |
| Combat exposure scale | 22.4 ± 7.2 | 23.2 ± 9.4 | NS |
Figure 1Comparison of levels of CD4+ and CD8+ cells and the proportion of these cells that express immune mediators. (A) A representative illustration of the gating strategy. Lymphoid cells were stained for CD4 and CD8 expression and identified in red-outlined quadrants as CD4+CD8- or CD8+CD4- cells. Gated CD4+CD8- cells were further analyzed for IFN-γ and Foxp3 staining, and gated CD8+CD4- cells analyzed for IFN-γ and granzyme B (GranzB) staining. (B) The percentages of CD4+CD8- cells, and the percentages of gated CD4+CD8- cells that express IFN-γ or Foxp3. (C) The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IFN-γ staining by gated CD4+CD8IFN-γ+ cells. (D) Percentages of CD8+CD4- cells, and the percentages of gated CD8+CD4- cells that express IFN-γ or granzyme B. (E) MFI of IFN-γ staining by gated CD8+CD4-IFN-γ+ cells. (F) MFI of granzyme B staining by gated CD8+CD4- cells. Shown as black circles are data for each research subject, with the mean values shown as squares. Mean values that are statistically different between Veterans with and without PTSD are shown as red squares.
Figure 2Identification and analysis of three CD8+ cell subpopulations. (A) A typical scattergram of single lymphoid cells stained for CD8 or CD4. Cells staining positive for CD8 and negative for CD4 are identified in the quadrant that is outlined in red. (B) Gated CD8+CD4- cells were analyzed for CD3 and CD8 staining and were identified by the red-outlined quadrants as cells that stain bright for CD8 and stain for CD3 (CD8hiCD3+), cells that stain dimly for CD8 and stain for CD3 (CD8dimCD3+) and cells that stain dimly for CD8 but do not stain for CD3 (CD8dimCD3-). (C) Strategy to analyzed gated CD8dimCD3+ cells for expression of IFN-γ or granzyme B. (D) Strategy to analyzed gated CD8dimCD3- cells for expression of IFN-γ or granzyme B. (E) Strategy to analyzed gated CD8hiCD3+ cells for expression of IFN-γ or granzyme B. (F) Comparison of levels of CD8hiCD3+, CD8dimCD3- or CD8dimCD3+ subpopulations. Shown as black circles are data for each research subject, with the mean values shown as squares.
Figure 3Expression of IFN-γ and granzyme B by CD8+ cell subpopulations. (A) Percentage of each of the CD8+CD4- subpopulations that express IFN-γ. (B) The MFI of IFN-γ staining by each of the three gated CD8+CD4-IFN-γ+ cell subpopulations. (C) The percentage of each of the CD8+CD4- subpopulations that express granzyme B. (D) The MFI of granzyme B staining by each of the three gated CD8+CD4-granzyme B+ cell subpopulations. Shown as black circles are data for each research subject, with the mean value shown as squares. Mean values that are statistically different between Veterans with and without PTSD are shown as red squares.