Literature DB >> 31619479

APOE ε4 is associated with younger age at ischemic stroke onset but not with stroke outcome.

Cecilia Lagging1, Erik Lorentzen2, Tara M Stanne2, Annie Pedersen2, Martin Söderholm2, John W Cole2, Katarina Jood2, Robin Lemmens2, Chia-Ling Phuah2, Natalia S Rost2, Vincent Thijs2, Daniel Woo2, Jane M Maguire2, Arne Lindgren2, Christina Jern2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31619479      PMCID: PMC6946482          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


× No keyword cloud information.
Stroke outcome is determined by a complex interplay, where age and stroke severity are predominant predictors. Studies on hemorrhagic stroke indicate that APOE genotype is a predictor of poststroke outcomes,[1,2] but results from studies on ischemic stroke are more conflicting.[1,3] There is 1 study suggesting an influence of APOE genotype on age at ischemic stroke onset,[4] and sex-specific effects on outcome have been reported.[5] Taken together, there is a need for larger studies on APOE and ischemic stroke outcomes with integrated information on age, severity, and sex. The 3 common APOE alleles ε2, ε3, and ε4 can be separated by a combination of 2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs429358 and rs7412. Thus, associations with APOE alleles are not directly captured in a regular genome-wide association study (GWAS), where each SNP is investigated separately. We derived the 3 common APOE alleles and investigated the interplay between APOE, age at ischemic stroke onset, severity, sex, and outcome within a large international collaboration, the Genetics of Ischaemic Stroke Functional Outcome (GISCOME) network.

Methods

The design and results of the first GWAS on ischemic stroke outcome within GISCOME have been reported,[6] and the present study comprises the 6,165 cases included in this GWAS. Each center individually obtained ethical approval and participant consent. Baseline stroke severity was assessed by the NIH Stroke Scale and 3-month functional outcome by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Genotyping was performed with SNP arrays with subsequent imputation to the 1000 Genomes Phase 3 reference panel as described.[6] In the present study, we investigated effects of APOE minor alleles ε4 and ε2 separately in comparison to the most common allele ε3. To this end, ε4 allele count was defined as the continuous imputed minor allele dosage of rs429358(C), excluding samples with minor allele dosage >0.4 for rs7412(T), and vice versa for ε2, as depicted in figure, A. Each cohort was analyzed separately, and for each analysis, cohorts with an effective number of minor alleles ≤5 or an extreme effect size (β > 100) were excluded. Results from the remaining cohorts were meta-analyzed using inverse variance-weighted fixed effects, unless there were signs of heterogeneity (p ≤ 0.05) in which case random effects were used.
Figure

APOE allele distribution and associations with age at ischemic stroke onset, stroke severity, and outcome

(A) Distribution of APOE alleles according to the SNPs rs429358 and rs7412. As the allele counts are inferred from imputation, they are given as a continuum between homozygosity for the major allele and homozygosity for the minor allele, with slightly shifted positions to improve clarity in the graph. In the analyses of ε4 vs ε3, 5,325 cases were included, and 4,519 cases were included in the analyses of ε2 vs ε3. Red positions correspond to cases excluded from both analyses. (B and D) Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) displaying associations between APOE allele count and age at ischemic stroke onset, stroke severity (baseline NIH Stroke Scale score), and dichotomized 3-month mRS score (mRS score 0–2 vs 3–6). N indicates number of cases with nonmissing information, except for APOE allele count where N refers to maximum number of cases included in the analysis, that is, cases with allele dosage ≤0.4 for rs7412(T) for ε4 vs ε3 and ≤0.4 for rs429358(C) for ε2 vs ε3. Figure, B examines associations with ε4 allele count and includes both sexes, whereas figure, D displays associations with ε2 allele count in men only. Associations are reported in the squared text boxes as β and p value derived from linear regression for associations with age and stroke severity, and OR and p value derived from logistic regression for associations with poor outcome (mRS score > 2). Adjustments are indicated in the parentheses as follows: PC, adjusted for ancestry (the 5 first principal components); A, age adjusted; S, stroke severity (baseline NIH Stroke Scale) adjusted. *Refers to result from random effects meta-analysis. Arrow thickness illustrates standardized effect size after the full adjustment specified in the respective text box. Arrow color refers to the direction of the effect. A dotted arrow indicates a nonsignificant association. (C) Bubble chart showing median age at ischemic stroke onset and ε4 allele frequency for individual cohorts in GISCOME. The cohorts are described in Söderholm et al.[6] Bubble diameter is proportional to the number of cases. Bubble color refers to the effect size (β) of ε4 on age at stroke onset derived from linear regression. GISCOME = Genetics of Ischemic Stroke Functional Outcome; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; OR = odds ratio; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

APOE allele distribution and associations with age at ischemic stroke onset, stroke severity, and outcome

(A) Distribution of APOE alleles according to the SNPs rs429358 and rs7412. As the allele counts are inferred from imputation, they are given as a continuum between homozygosity for the major allele and homozygosity for the minor allele, with slightly shifted positions to improve clarity in the graph. In the analyses of ε4 vs ε3, 5,325 cases were included, and 4,519 cases were included in the analyses of ε2 vs ε3. Red positions correspond to cases excluded from both analyses. (B and D) Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) displaying associations between APOE allele count and age at ischemic stroke onset, stroke severity (baseline NIH Stroke Scale score), and dichotomized 3-month mRS score (mRS score 0–2 vs 3–6). N indicates number of cases with nonmissing information, except for APOE allele count where N refers to maximum number of cases included in the analysis, that is, cases with allele dosage ≤0.4 for rs7412(T) for ε4 vs ε3 and ≤0.4 for rs429358(C) for ε2 vs ε3. Figure, B examines associations with ε4 allele count and includes both sexes, whereas figure, D displays associations with ε2 allele count in men only. Associations are reported in the squared text boxes as β and p value derived from linear regression for associations with age and stroke severity, and OR and p value derived from logistic regression for associations with poor outcome (mRS score > 2). Adjustments are indicated in the parentheses as follows: PC, adjusted for ancestry (the 5 first principal components); A, age adjusted; S, stroke severity (baseline NIH Stroke Scale) adjusted. *Refers to result from random effects meta-analysis. Arrow thickness illustrates standardized effect size after the full adjustment specified in the respective text box. Arrow color refers to the direction of the effect. A dotted arrow indicates a nonsignificant association. (C) Bubble chart showing median age at ischemic stroke onset and ε4 allele frequency for individual cohorts in GISCOME. The cohorts are described in Söderholm et al.[6] Bubble diameter is proportional to the number of cases. Bubble color refers to the effect size (β) of ε4 on age at stroke onset derived from linear regression. GISCOME = Genetics of Ischemic Stroke Functional Outcome; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; OR = odds ratio; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism. We used directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to investigate associations between APOE, age at stroke onset, stroke severity, and outcome. A DAG illustrates associations between variables according to a definite direction of causality as depicted by the arrows connecting the variables. For instance, APOE can influence age at stroke onset and/or stroke severity, but reverse causality is unlikely as APOE genotype is determined at conception. As age and stroke severity are well-established predictors of stroke outcome, we aimed to account for both possible direct effects of APOE on outcome and/or indirect effects via associations with age and/or stroke severity as depicted by the 3 different arrows originating from APOE in figures, B and D. All genetic analyses were adjusted for ancestry (the 5 first principal components), and adjustments for age and stroke severity were made as indicated (figure, B and D). Prespecified sex-stratified analyses were performed. Associations between allele count, age, and stroke severity were analyzed by linear regression. Associations with outcome were analyzed with logistic (dichotomized mRS score 0–2 vs 3–6) and ordinal logistic regression.

Results

Increasing allele count of ε4 was associated with younger age at stroke onset (β −1.8, p < 0.001, figure, B). This association was consistent across a majority of cohorts (figure, C), significant in both sexes and in cases with first-ever stroke only (data not shown). There was an association between ε4 allele count and favorable outcome (mRS score ≤2) when adjusting only for ancestry, but this association was no longer retained after additional adjustment for age and stoke severity (figure, B). For ε2 allele count, we found a direct association with poor outcome (mRS score >2) in men after adjustment for ancestry, age, and stroke severity (figure, D). No such association was detected in the whole sample or in women. Neither ε4 nor ε2 allele count showed association with stroke severity.

Discussion

This is the largest meta-analysis with combined information on common APOE alleles, age at ischemic stroke onset, severity, and outcome to our knowledge. We found that increasing ε4 allele count was associated with younger age at stroke onset, which is in line with a previous meta-analysis of candidate gene studies.[4] However, we found no evidence of a direct effect of ε4 on outcome, similar to 1 recent candidate gene study (N = 786)[7] and 1 meta-analysis (N = 1,453).[1] Future studies should elucidate the biological mechanisms behind the association between APOE ε4 allele count and younger age at ischemic stroke onset. However, possible mechanisms include effects of altered lipid metabolism. In a pooled analysis, where associations between APOE genotype and several biomarkers were investigated, there was an apparent dose-response segregation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations by APOE genotype, with the highest values in subjects homozygote for the APOE ε4 allele.[8] Furthermore, the same ordering was observed for increasing carotid intima-media thickness and risk of ischemic stroke.[8] In the sex-stratified analysis, we found an association between increasing ε2 allele count and poor outcome in men. Sex-specific effects of APOE on ischemic stroke outcome have been reported[5] and are not unreasonable to assume from a cardiovascular viewpoint. The ε2 allele has been associated with increasing white matter disease (WMD) in patients with ischemic stroke,[9] and WMD is in turn associated with poor stroke outcome. Our results might thus be related to a higher prevalence of WMD in male ε2 carriers. However, as we lacked data on WMD for all participants, this hypothesis remains speculative. The GISCOME study has the advantage of being the largest sample of genetic and ischemic stroke outcome data available. Study limitations have been previously discussed.[6] In addition, the sample size for the sex-stratified analyses in our present study was small, and we used imputed values from SNP arrays to establish common APOE alleles. However, imputation based on the 1000 Genomes reference panel has been reported reliable in inferring these APOE alleles.[10] In conclusion, this study shows that APOE ε4 carriers have a younger age at ischemic stroke onset. We also detected worse functional outcome in male ε2 carriers, a result needing replication. Given these findings, even larger studies would be of interest to investigate associations between APOE alleles and ischemic stroke outcomes in different age and sex strata.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Stroke Recovery Genetics.

Authors:  Arne Lindgren; Jane Maguire
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Association between Apolipoprotein ε4 Gene Polymorphism and Risk of Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Amit Kumar; Pradeep Kumar; Manya Prasad; Shubham Misra; Awadh Kishor Pandit; Kamalesh Chakravarty
Journal:  Ann Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-07

3.  Accuracy of imputation to infer unobserved APOE epsilon alleles in genome-wide genotyping data.

Authors:  Farid Radmanesh; William J Devan; Christopher D Anderson; Jonathan Rosand; Guido J Falcone
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Effects of apolipoprotein E genotype on outcome after ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  N A Martínez-González; C L M Sudlow
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Association of apolipoprotein E epsilon2 with white matter disease but not with microbleeds.

Authors:  Robin Lemmens; Astrid Görner; Maarten Schrooten; Vincent Thijs
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  The APOE polymorphism and 1-year outcome in ischemic stroke: genotype-gender interaction.

Authors:  G Gromadzka; M Baranska-Gieruszczak; I Sarzynska-Dlugosz; A Ciesielska; A Czlonkowska
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.209

7.  APOE genotype and extent of bleeding and outcome in lobar intracerebral haemorrhage: a genetic association study.

Authors:  Alessandro Biffi; Christopher D Anderson; Jeremiasz M Jagiella; Helena Schmidt; Brett Kissela; Björn M Hansen; Jordi Jimenez-Conde; Caroline R Pires; Alison M Ayres; Kristin Schwab; Lynelle Cortellini; Joanna Pera; Andrzej Urbanik; Javier M Romero; Natalia S Rost; Joshua N Goldstein; Anand Viswanathan; Alexander Pichler; Christian Enzinger; Raquel Rabionet; Bo Norrving; David L Tirschwell; Magdy Selim; Devin L Brown; Scott L Silliman; Bradford B Worrall; James F Meschia; Chelsea S Kidwell; Joseph P Broderick; Steven M Greenberg; Jaume Roquer; Arne Lindgren; Agnieszka Slowik; Reinhold Schmidt; Daniel Woo; Jonathan Rosand
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 8.  Apolipoprotein E genotype, cardiovascular biomarkers and risk of stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of 14,015 stroke cases and pooled analysis of primary biomarker data from up to 60,883 individuals.

Authors:  Tauseef A Khan; Tina Shah; David Prieto; Weili Zhang; Jackie Price; Gerald R Fowkes; Jackie Cooper; Philippa J Talmud; Steve E Humphries; Johan Sundstrom; Jaroslav A Hubacek; Shah Ebrahim; Debbie A Lawlor; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Mohammad R Abdollahi; Arjen J C Slooter; Zoltan Szolnoki; Manjinder Sandhu; Nicholas Wareham; Ruth Frikke-Schmidt; Anne Tybjærg-Hansen; Gerda Fillenbaum; Bastiaan T Heijmans; Tomohiro Katsuya; Grazyna Gromadzka; Andrew Singleton; Luigi Ferrucci; John Hardy; Bradford Worrall; Stephen S Rich; Mar Matarin; John Whittaker; Tom R Gaunt; Peter Whincup; Richard Morris; John Deanfield; Ann Donald; George Davey Smith; Mika Kivimaki; Meena Kumari; Liam Smeeth; Kay-Tee Khaw; Michael Nalls; James Meschia; Kai Sun; Rutai Hui; Ian Day; Aroon D Hingorani; Juan P Casas
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Association of apolipoprotein E genotype with outcome in hospitalized ischemic stroke patients.

Authors:  Yajing Zhang; Shuling Liu; Wei Yue; Zhihong Shi; Yalin Guan; Mingzi Li; Yong Ji; Xin Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Genome-wide association meta-analysis of functional outcome after ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Martin Söderholm; Annie Pedersen; Erik Lorentzen; Tara M Stanne; Steve Bevan; Maja Olsson; John W Cole; Israel Fernandez-Cadenas; Graeme J Hankey; Jordi Jimenez-Conde; Katarina Jood; Jin-Moo Lee; Robin Lemmens; Christopher Levi; Braxton D Mitchell; Bo Norrving; Kristiina Rannikmäe; Natalia S Rost; Jonathan Rosand; Peter M Rothwell; Rodney Scott; Daniel Strbian; Jonathan W Sturm; Cathie Sudlow; Matthew Traylor; Vincent Thijs; Turgut Tatlisumak; Daniel Woo; Bradford B Worrall; Jane M Maguire; Arne Lindgren; Christina Jern
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 11.800

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Genetic Factors, Brain Atrophy, and Response to Rehabilitation Therapy After Stroke.

Authors:  Steven C Cramer; Jill See; Brent Liu; Matthew Edwardson; Ximing Wang; Shlomit Radom-Aizik; Fadia Haddad; Babak Shahbaba; Steven L Wolf; Alexander W Dromerick; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 2.  APOE in the bullseye of neurodegenerative diseases: impact of the APOE genotype in Alzheimer's disease pathology and brain diseases.

Authors:  Rosalía Fernández-Calle; Sabine C Konings; Javier Frontiñán-Rubio; Juan García-Revilla; Lluís Camprubí-Ferrer; Martina Svensson; Isak Martinson; Antonio Boza-Serrano; José Luís Venero; Henrietta M Nielsen; Gunnar K Gouras; Tomas Deierborg
Journal:  Mol Neurodegener       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 18.879

3.  Hypertension and Hypercholesterolemia Modify Dementia Risk in Relation to APOEɛ4 Status.

Authors:  Jagan A Pillai; Lei Kou; James Bena; Lisa Penn; James B Leverenz
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.472

4.  Trajectories of depression symptoms over time differ by APOE4 genotype in older adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Inbar Lavie; Michal Schnaider Beeri; Yuval Berman; Yonathan Schwartz; Laili Soleimani; Anthony Heymann; Ramit Ravona-Springer
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.485

5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Apolipoprotein E in Migraine: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Rabia Latif; Nazish Rafique; Lubna Al Asoom; Ahmed A Alsunni; Ayad Mohammed Salem; Dinah Abdulhadi AlNoaimi; Wasan Mohammed AlHarbi; Ahad Yasir Shaikh; Shoug Abdullah AlRaddadi; Leena Abdulrahman AlMuhaish; Dana Almohazey; Sayed Abdulazeez; J Francis Borgio
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-03-12

Review 6.  Genetic architecture of common non-Alzheimer's disease dementias.

Authors:  Rita Guerreiro; Elizabeth Gibbons; Miguel Tábuas-Pereira; Celia Kun-Rodrigues; Gustavo C Santo; Jose Bras
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 5.996

7.  Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms May Increase the Risk of Aspiration Pneumonia in Post-Stroke Patients with Dysphagia.

Authors:  Hae-Yeon Park; Hyun-Mi Oh; Tae-Woo Kim; Youngkook Kim; Geun-Young Park; Hyemi Hwang; Sun Im
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.976

8.  The Role of DNA Methylation in Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Minyan Zeng; Juanying Zhen; Xiaodan Zheng; Hongyan Qiu; Xiaonan Xu; Jun Wu; Zhijian Lin; Jun Hu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 9.  Alzheimer Disease: Recent Updates on Apolipoprotein E and Gut Microbiome Mediation of Oxidative Stress, and Prospective Interventional Agents.

Authors:  Benson Oa Botchway; Favour C Okoye; Yili Chen; William E Arthur; Marong Fang
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.745

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.