Literature DB >> 31619444

Lucitanib for the Treatment of HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results from the Multicohort Phase II FINESSE Study.

Rina Hui1, Alex Pearson2, Javier Cortes3, Christine Campbell4, Camille Poirot5, Hatem A Azim6, Debora Fumagalli7, Matteo Lambertini8,9, Fergus Daly4, Amal Arahmani7, José Perez-Garcia10, Philippe Aftimos8, Philippe L Bedard11, Laura Xuereb5, Elsemieke D Scheepers4, Malou Vicente8, Theodora Goulioti7, Sibylle Loibl12, Sherene Loi13, Marie-Jeanne Pierrat5, Nicholas C Turner2, Fabrice Andre14, Giuseppe Curigliano15.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The FGFR1 gene is amplified in 14% of patients with HR + /HER2 - breast cancer. Efficacy and safety of lucitanib, an inhibitor of VEGFR1-3, FGFR1-3, and PDGFRα/β, were assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HR + /HER2 - metastatic breast cancer (MBC) received oral lucitanib in three centrally confirmed cohorts: (i) FGFR1 amplified, (ii) FGFR1 nonamplified, 11q13 amplified, and (iii) FGFR1 and 11q13 nonamplified. Key inclusion criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≤2, ≥1 line of anticancer therapy, but ≤2 lines of chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was overall response rates (ORR) by RECIST1.1. Simon's two-stage design was used: If ≥2 patients responded among 21 patients, 20 additional patients could be enrolled in each cohort. FGFR1 copy-number variation (CNV) was determined by FISH and droplet digital PCR, whereas FGFR1 expression was determined by IHC.
RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (32/18/26 in cohorts 1/2/3) from nine countries were enrolled. The prespecified primary endpoint was met in cohort 1 with ORR of 19% [95% confidence interval (CI), 9%-35%], but not in cohorts 2 and 3 with ORR of 0% (95% CI, 0%-18%) and 15% (95% CI, 6%-34%), respectively. Frequent adverse events included hypertension (87%), hypothyroidism (45%), nausea (33%), and proteinuria (32%). Exploratory biomarker analyses suggested higher ORR in patients with high FGFR1 amplification (≥4 CNV) than those without high amplification (22% vs. 9%). ORR in patients with FGFR1-high tumors (IHC, H-score ≥50) was 25% versus 8% in FGFR1-low cancers.
CONCLUSIONS: Lucitanib had modest antitumor activity and significant hypertension-related toxicity in patients with HR + /HER2 - MBC. Although based on small sample sizes, exploratory biomarker analyses suggested that patients with high FGFR1 amplification or expression might derive greater benefit. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31619444     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  12 in total

1.  FGFR1 Antibody Validation and Characterization of FGFR1 Protein Expression in ER+ Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson; Alberto Servetto; Luigi Formisano; Violeta Sánchez; Ingrid A Mayer; Carlos L Arteaga; Melinda E Sanders
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2022-09-12

2.  Occult metastatic thyroid cancer diagnosed during breast cancer axillary sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  Pratima Herle; Steven Boyages; Rina Hui; Najmun Nahar; Nicholas K Ngui
Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-20

3.  Results of the phase IIa RADICAL trial of the FGFR inhibitor AZD4547 in endocrine resistant breast cancer.

Authors:  R C Coombes; P D Badman; J P Lozano-Kuehne; X Liu; I R Macpherson; I Zubairi; R D Baird; N Rosenfeld; J Garcia-Corbacho; N Cresti; R Plummer; A Armstrong; R Allerton; D Landers; H Nicholas; L McLellan; A Lim; F Mouliere; O E Pardo; M J Seckl
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 4.  Breast Cancer: A Molecularly Heterogenous Disease Needing Subtype-Specific Treatments.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-23

Review 5.  Inhibition of FGF-FGFR and VEGF-VEGFR signalling in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Guihong Liu; Tao Chen; Zhenyu Ding; Yang Wang; Yuquan Wei; Xiawei Wei
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.831

6.  FGFR1 Amplification and Response to Neoadjuvant Anti-HER2 Treatment in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  María Gaibar; Apolonia Novillo; Alicia Romero-Lorca; Diego Malón; Beatriz Antón; Amalia Moreno; Ana Fernández-Santander
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.321

7.  A Phase Ib Study of Lucitanib (AL3810) in a Cohort of Patients with Recurrent and Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Fan Luo; Yu-Xiang Ma; Qian-Wen Liu; Yun-Peng Yang; Wen-Feng Fang; Yan Huang; Ting Zhou; Jin Li; Hong-Ming Pan; Lei Yang; Shu-Kui Qin; Hong-Yun Zhao; Li Zhang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.837

8.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Lucitanib in Patients with Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Mingxiang Liao; Jie Zhou; Kenton Wride; Denise Lepley; Terri Cameron; Mark Sale; Jim Xiao
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.569

9.  Serial Tumor Molecular Profiling of Newly Diagnosed HER2-Negative Breast Cancers During Chemotherapy in Combination with Angiogenesis Inhibitors.

Authors:  Joan R E Choo; Yi-Hua Jan; Samuel G W Ow; Andrea Wong; Matilda Xinwei Lee; Natalie Ngoi; Kritika Yadav; Joline S J Lim; Siew Eng Lim; Ching Wan Chan; Mikael Hartman; Siau Wei Tang; Boon Cher Goh; Hon Lyn Tan; Wan Qin Chong; Ang Li En Yvonne; Gloria H J Chan; Shu-Jen Chen; Kien Thiam Tan; Soo Chin Lee
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.864

10.  Resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors confers cross-resistance to other CDK inhibitors but not to chemotherapeutic agents in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Ryohei Ogata; Emi Kishino; Wataru Saitoh; Yoshikazu Koike; Junichi Kurebayashi
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.