Literature DB >> 31619364

Evidence of Diagnostic and Treatment Delay in Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis: Missing the Window of Opportunity.

Caitrin M Coffey1, Cynthia S Crowson2, Elena Myasoedova3, Eric L Matteson2, John M Davis4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the time from first joint swelling to fulfillment of the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria between patients with seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to assess the impact of seronegative status on the time from first joint swelling to initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy and achievement of remission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Times from first provider-documented joint swelling to fulfillment of the 1987 and 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria and to the clinical diagnosis of RA were measured in a population-based cohort of adults with incident RA between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014. Disease characteristics and achievement of remission were compared between seropositive (rheumatoid factor positive and/or anti-citrullinated peptide antibody positive) and seronegative (rheumatoid factor negative/anti-citrullinated peptide antibody negative) patients.
RESULTS: The median time from first joint swelling to fulfillment of the 1987 (48 [interquartile range (IQR), 0-300] days vs 2 [IQR, 0-45] days; P=.001) and 2010 (14 [IQR, 0-196] days vs 0 [IQR, 0-29] days; P=.004) classification criteria and the median time from first joint swelling to the clinical diagnosis of RA (187 [IQR, 13-503] days vs 11 [IQR, 0-76] days; P<.001) were significantly longer in seronegative patients than in seropositive patients. The median time from first joint swelling to first prescribed DMARD therapy was significantly longer in seronegative patients (40 [IQR, 5-199] days vs 14 [IQR, 0-73] days; P=.01). Patients with seronegative RA were less likely to achieve remission (28% vs 50% at 5 years after fulfillment of the 2010 criteria; P=.007), but there was no difference when the patient global score was removed from the remission definition.
CONCLUSION: Patients with seronegative RA experienced a delay in diagnosis, according to both the 1987 and 2010 classification criteria, as well as a delay in the initiation of DMARD therapy. Patients with seronegative RA were also less likely to attain remission, suggesting that the window of opportunity for intervention may be more frequently missed in this group.
Copyright © 2019 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31619364     DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  10 in total

1.  Multimorbidity Burden in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tina M Gunderson; Elena Myasoedova; John M Davis; Cynthia S Crowson
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  Response to: 'Increasing incidence of autoantibody-negative RA is replicated and is partly explained by an aging population' by Matthijssen et al.

Authors:  Elena Myasoedova; John Davis; Eric L Matteson; Cynthia S Crowson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 27.973

3.  A 9 mRNAs-based diagnostic signature for rheumatoid arthritis by integrating bioinformatic analysis and machine-learning.

Authors:  Jianyong Liu; Ningjie Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Impact of autoimmune serology test results on RA classification and diagnosis.

Authors:  Lieve Van Hoovels; Paul Studenic; Daniela Sieghart; Günter Steiner; Xavier Bossuyt; Johan Rönnelid
Journal:  J Transl Autoimmun       Date:  2022-01-06

5.  Is the epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis changing? Results from a population-based incidence study, 1985-2014.

Authors:  Elena Myasoedova; John Davis; Eric L Matteson; Cynthia S Crowson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Cross-Tissue Transcriptomic Analysis Leveraging Machine Learning Approaches Identifies New Biomarkers for Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Dmitry Rychkov; Jessica Neely; Tomiko Oskotsky; Steven Yu; Noah Perlmutter; Joanne Nititham; Alexander Carvidi; Melissa Krueger; Andrew Gross; Lindsey A Criswell; Judith F Ashouri; Marina Sirota
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 7.  Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Samantha C Shapiro
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-16

8.  Comprehensive Bioinformatics Analysis Reveals Hub Genes and Inflammation State of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Conglin Ren; Mingshuang Li; Weibin Du; Jianlan Lü; Yang Zheng; Haipeng Xu; Renfu Quan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Factors associated with treatment satisfaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from the biological register RABBIT.

Authors:  Martin Schäfer; Katinka Albrecht; Jörn Kekow; Karin Rockwitz; Anke Liebhaber; Angela Zink; Anja Strangfeld
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2020-10

10.  Comparison of healthcare resource utilization and medical costs between patients with seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Hyoungyoung Kim; Soo-Kyung Cho; Seongmi Choi; Seul Gi Im; Sun-Young Jung; Eun Jin Jang; Yoon-Kyoung Sung
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.346

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.