Literature DB >> 31618704

Cetuximab, fluorouracil and cisplatin with or without docetaxel for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CeFCiD): an open-label phase II randomised trial (AIO/IAG-KHT trial 1108).

K Klinghammer1, T Gauler2, A Dietz3, V Grünwald4, J Stöhlmacher5, S Knipping6, M Schroeder7, O Guntinas-Lichius8, N Frickhofen9, H-W Lindeman10, R Fietkau11, B Haxel12, C Große-Thie13, G Maschmeyer14, M Zipfel15, P Martus16, M Knoedler17, U Keilholz18.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cetuximab (PFC) is the reference first-line treatment for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We analysed whether treatment intensification by the addition of docetaxel to PFC improved efficacy in R/M SCCHN.
METHODS: A total of 180 patients with R/M SCCHN (1:1) were assigned to receive either cisplatin (40 mg/m2), docetaxel (40 mg/m2) and 5-FU (2000 mg/m2) at days 1 and 8 and cetuximab (400/250 mg/m2) at days 1, 8 and 15 (DPFC) or standard cisplatin (100 mg/m2) at day 1, 5-FU (1000 mg/m2) at days 1-4 and cetuximab (400/250 mg/m2) at days 1, 8 and 15 (PFC). Chemotherapy was repeated every 21 days and continued for a maximum of 6 cycles in absence of disease progression or limiting toxicity, followed by cetuximab maintenance (500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks). The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: A preplanned interim analysis for toxicity after 20 patients/arm revealed excessive grade 3 and 4 gastrointestinal (65%) and infectious toxicities (35%) in arm A, which led to dose reduction of cisplatin to 30 mg/m2 and 5-FU to 1000 mg/m2 for subsequent patients. With a median follow-up of 2 years, grade 4 toxicities were 21.3% vs. 30.8% for DPFC and PFC, respectively. More treatment-related deaths occurred with DPFC vs. PFC, with 11.2% and 6.6%, respectively. For DPFC and PFC, the median PFS was 6.3 vs. 6.4 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.97, p = 0.87), the median overall survival was 8.9 vs. 10.6 months (HR = 1.29 p = 0.1) and response rates were 38.2% vs. 31.9% (p = 0.9), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: DPFC failed to improve efficacy in R/M SCCHN. On the contrary, a high toxicity and mortality rate was detected in both arms, which underscores the vulnerability of patients with R/M SCCHN, and research on the need for further optimisation of the front-line chemotherapy backbone is ongoing.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cetuximab; Chemotherapy; Docetaxel; Head and neck cancer; Randomised trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31618704     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  5 in total

1.  Immune-checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy for treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhe Jin; Bin Zhang; Lu Zhang; Wenhui Huang; Xiaokai Mo; Qiuyin Chen; Fei Wang; Zhuozhi Chen; Minmin Li; Shuixing Zhang
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 8.168

2.  Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies.

Authors:  Ellen Cusano; Chelsea Wong; Eddy Taguedong; Marcus Vaska; Tasnima Abedin; Nancy Nixon; Safiya Karim; Patricia Tang; Daniel Y C Heng; Doreen Ezeife
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Treatment Stratification in First-Line Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer, on Behalf of the EORTC Young Investigator Head and Neck Cancer Group.

Authors:  Konrad Klinghammer; Luigi Lorini; Daan Nevens; Christian Simon; Jean-Pascal Machiels; Paolo Bossi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Evaluation of prognostic biomarkers in a population-validated Finnish HNSCC patient cohort.

Authors:  J Routila; I Leivo; H Minn; J Westermarck; Sami Ventelä
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Choosing the Right Treatment Option for the Right R/M HNSCC Patient: Should We Adhere to PFE for First-Line Therapy?

Authors:  Katharina Lübbers; Mykola Pavlychenko; Theresa Wald; Susanne Wiegand; Andreas Dietz; Veit Zebralla; Gunnar Wichmann
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.