Fabio Perrotta1, Antonio Cennamo2, Francesco Saverio Cerqua2, Francesco Stefanelli3, Andrea Bianco2, Salvatore Musella3, Marco Rispoli4, Rosario Salvi5, Ilemando Meoli3. 1. . Dipartimento di Medicina e Scienze della Salute V. Tiberio, Università degli Studi del Molise, Campobasso, Italia. 2. . Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche Traslazionali, Ospedale Monaldi. Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli Napoli, Italia. 3. . Divisione di Pneumologia, Ospedale Monaldi, Napoli, Italia. 4. . Dipartimento di Anestesia and Unità di Terapia Intensiva. A.O. dei Colli, Ospedale Monaldi, Napoli, Italia. 5. . Dipartimento di Chirurgia Toracica. A.O. dei Colli, Ospedale Monaldi, Napoli, Italia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Preoperative functional evaluation is central to optimizing the identification of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are candidates for surgery. The minute ventilation/carbon dioxide output (VE/VCO2) slope has proven to be a predictor of surgical complications and mortality. Pulmonary rehabilitation programs (PRPs) could influence short-term outcomes in patients with COPD undergoing lung resection. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of a PRP on the VE/VCO2 slope in a cohort of patients with COPD undergoing lung resection for NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 25 consecutive patients with COPD participating in a three-week high-intensity PRP prior to undergoing lung surgery for NSCLC, between December of 2015 and January of 2017. Patients underwent complete functional assessment, including spirometry, DLCO measurement, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the mean pre- and post-PRP values (% of predicted) for FEV1 (61.5 ± 22.0% vs. 62.0 ± 21.1%) and DLCO (67.2 ± 18.1% vs. 67.5 ± 13.2%). Conversely, there were significant improvements in the mean peak oxygen uptake (from 14.7 ± 2.5 to 18.2 ± 2.7 mL/kg per min; p < 0.001) and VE/VCO2 slope (from 32.0 ± 2.8 to 30.1 ± 4.0; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that a high-intensity PRP can improve ventilatory efficiency in patients with COPD undergoing lung resection for NSCLC. Further comprehensive prospective studies are required to corroborate these preliminary results.
OBJECTIVE: Preoperative functional evaluation is central to optimizing the identification of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are candidates for surgery. The minute ventilation/carbon dioxide output (VE/VCO2) slope has proven to be a predictor of surgical complications and mortality. Pulmonary rehabilitation programs (PRPs) could influence short-term outcomes in patients with COPD undergoing lung resection. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of a PRP on the VE/VCO2 slope in a cohort of patients with COPD undergoing lung resection for NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 25 consecutive patients with COPD participating in a three-week high-intensity PRP prior to undergoing lung surgery for NSCLC, between December of 2015 and January of 2017. Patients underwent complete functional assessment, including spirometry, DLCO measurement, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the mean pre- and post-PRP values (% of predicted) for FEV1 (61.5 ± 22.0% vs. 62.0 ± 21.1%) and DLCO (67.2 ± 18.1% vs. 67.5 ± 13.2%). Conversely, there were significant improvements in the mean peak oxygen uptake (from 14.7 ± 2.5 to 18.2 ± 2.7 mL/kg per min; p < 0.001) and VE/VCO2 slope (from 32.0 ± 2.8 to 30.1 ± 4.0; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that a high-intensity PRP can improve ventilatory efficiency in patients with COPD undergoing lung resection for NSCLC. Further comprehensive prospective studies are required to corroborate these preliminary results.
Authors: Ersilia Nigro; Fabio Perrotta; Maria Ludovica Monaco; Rita Polito; Pia Clara Pafundi; Maria Gabriella Matera; Aurora Daniele; Andrea Bianco Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2020-06-18
Authors: Ersilia Nigro; Fabio Perrotta; Filippo Scialò; Vito D'Agnano; Marta Mallardo; Andrea Bianco; Aurora Daniele Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.390