Literature DB >> 31618066

Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair.

Kelechi R Okoroha1, Edward C Beck1, Benedict U Nwachukwu1, Kyle N Kunze1, Shane J Nho1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic surgical repair has become a common procedure for treating patients with gluteus medius tears. However, meaningful clinical outcomes after the procedure have not been defined.
PURPOSE: To (1) define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) in patients undergoing endoscopic gluteus medius repair and (2) determine correlations between preoperative patient characteristics and achievement of MCID/PASS. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing primary endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tears between January 2012 and February 2017 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient data collected included patient characteristics, radiographic parameters, preoperative clinical function scores, and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Paired t tests were used to compare the differences in 2-year PROs. The MCID and PASS for each PRO were calculated and Spearman coefficient analysis was used to identify correlations between MCID, PASS, and preoperative variables.
RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were included in the study. A majority of patients were female (91.7%), with an average age and body mass index of 57.9 ± 9.91 years and 27.6 ± 6.1, respectively. The MCIDs of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport-Specific (SS) subscales of the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) and the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) were calculated to be 15.02, 14.53, and 14.13, respectively. The PASS scores of HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and mHHS were calculated to be 81.32, 67.71, and 77.5, respectively. In addition, 76.7% of patients achieved either MCID or PASS postoperatively, with 77.8% and 69.0% reaching at least 1 threshold score for achieving MCID and PASS, respectively, and 48.3% achieving both MCID and PASS. Smoking had a negative and weak association with achieving PASS (r = -0.271; P = .039). No other patient characteristic variables were found to correlate with achieving MCID or PASS.
CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing endoscopic gluteus medius repair, our study defined MCID and PASS for HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and mHHS outcome scores. A large percentage of patients (76.7%) achieved meaningful clinical outcomes at 2 years after surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic gluteus medius repair; gluteus medius tear; minimally clinical important difference; outcome score; patient acceptable symptomatic state

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31618066     DOI: 10.1177/0363546519877179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  7 in total

1.  Achievement of the minimal clinically important difference following open proximal hamstring repair.

Authors:  Cort D Lawton; Spencer W Sullivan; Kyle J Hancock; Joost A Burger; Danyal H Nawabi; Bryan T Kelly; Anil S Ranawat; Benedict U Nwachukwu
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2021-08-19

Review 2.  Recommendations in the rehabilitation of patients undergoing hip abductor tendon repair: a systematic literature search and evidence based rehabilitation protocol.

Authors:  Jay R Ebert; Angela M Fearon; Paul N Smith; Gregory C Janes
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Return to Activity After Gluteus Medius Repair in Active Patients Older Than 50 Years.

Authors:  Mitchell B Meghpara; Mitchell J Yelton; Shawn Annin; Philip J Rosinsky; Jacob Shapira; David R Maldonado; Ajay C Lall; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-27

4.  Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Open Hip Abductor Repair.

Authors:  Tyler J Uppstrom; Spencer W Sullivan; Joost A Burger; Anil S Ranawat; Bryan T Kelly; Benedict U Nwachukwu
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-07

5.  Superior Gluteal Reconstruction Results in Promising Outcomes for Massive Abductor Tendon Tears.

Authors:  Robert B Browning; Ian M Clapp; Thomas D Alter; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Theodore Wolfson; Sunikom Suppauksorn; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-08

6.  Short-term outcomes following mini-open repair of chronic gluteus medius tendon tears using a double-row technique.

Authors:  Marc Barrera; Hugo Bothorel; Lazaros Poultsides; Panayiotis Christofilopoulos
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2021-08-25

7.  What is the Role of Kinesiophobia and Pain Catastrophizing in Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome?

Authors:  Ian M Clapp; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Edward C Beck; Jonathan P Rasio; Thomas Alter; Bradley Allison; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-01-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.