Literature DB >> 31617891

The effect of scissor-type versus non-scissor-type knives on the technical outcomes in endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer: a multi-center retrospective study.

Mitsuru Esaki1,2, Yasuyo Hayashi2,3, Hisatomo Ikehara1,4, Eikichi Ihara2, Toshiki Horii1, Yu Tamura1, Ryoji Ichijima1, Shun Yamakawa1, Akira Irie1, Hitoshi Shibuya1,4, Sho Suzuki1,4, Chika Kusano1,4, Yosuke Minoda2, Hirotada Akiho3, Yoshihiro Ogawa2, Takuji Gotoda1.   

Abstract

The Clutch Cutter was invented as a scissor-type knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastrointestinal neoplasms. ESD with the scissor-type knife (ESD-S) may be considered a technically easier procedure than ESD with non-scissor-type knives (ESD-NS). Therefore, this study aimed to compare the technical outcomes of ESD-S with those of ESD-NS for superficial esophageal cancer. This was a multicenter retrospective study. Patients with superficial esophageal cancer treated with ESD between October 2015 and March 2018 at three hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. The ESD-S group had 48 patients and the ESD-NS group had 114 patients. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to compensate for the confounding bias between both groups. Multivariate analyses and propensity score matching were used to adjust for age, sex, the tumor size, tumor location, tumor depth, degree of tumor circumference, operator level, usage of the traction method, and the sedation method. The primary outcome was the procedure time of the ESD. Secondary outcomes were the rate of en-bloc/complete resection and the rate of complications including perforation, delayed bleeding, and stricture. Propensity score matching analysis provided 36 matched pairs. Median procedure time in the ESD-S group was significantly shorter than that in the ESD-NS group (44.0 min vs. 66.5 min, P = 0.020). In addition, the treatment outcomes were similar in both groups (en-bloc resection: 100% vs. 97.2%, P = 1; complete resection: 88.9% vs. 86.1%, P = 1; curative resection: 80.6% vs. 77.8%, P = 1; perforation: 0% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.49; delayed bleeding: 0% in both groups; stricture: 2.8% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.61). ESD-S was associated with a shorter procedure time than ESD-NS, without an increase in the incidence of complications. Therefore, the scissor-type knife should be considered as an endo-knife for ESD of superficial esophageal cancers.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopic submucosal dissection; esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; gastrointestinal cancers

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31617891     DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  2 in total

1.  Assistant skill in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection using a clutch cutter.

Authors:  Mitsuru Esaki; Toshiki Horii; Ryoji Ichijima; Masafumi Wada; Seiichiro Sakisaka; Shuichi Abe; Naru Tomoeda; Yusuke Kitagawa; Kei Nishioka; Yosuke Minoda; Shinichi Tsuruta; Sho Suzuki; Hirotada Akiho; Eikichi Ihara; Yoshihiro Ogawa; Takuji Gotoda
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-02-27

2.  Ex vivo porcine model study on the treatment outcomes of scissor-type knife versus needle-type knife in endoscopic submucosal dissection performed by trainees.

Authors:  Ryoji Ichijima; Mitsuru Esaki; Shun Yamakawa; Yosuke Minoda; Sho Suzuki; Chika Kusano; Hisatomo Ikehara; Takuji Gotoda
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.