Literature DB >> 31617684

Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yi Deng1,2, David Kieser3,4, Michael Wyatt5, Mark Stringer3, Christopher Frampton4, Gary Hooper3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fractures are becoming increasingly common, often leading to poor patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFx).
METHODS: Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review of the databases MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, from the earliest available date to December 2017. We included all clinical articles reporting more than 100 post-operative PPFFx around total hip arthroplasty (THA). Outcomes included demographics, fracture type, risk factors and time to fracture.
RESULTS: A total of 12 868 PPFFx were reported across 18 eligible studies; 64% occurred following primary THA and 36% occurred after revision THA, and 66% of all fractures were in females. Vancouver B2 fractures were the most common type (39%). We found the odds of sustaining a PPFFx is significantly lower after a primary THA compared to revision THA (odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.40, P < 0.00001). The incidence of PPFFx is 2.96 per 1000 person-years following primary THA compared to 9.08 per 1000 person-years following revision THA (odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.40). The time to fracture was 6.03 years following primary THA and 4.08 years following revision THA. Gender and cementation did not significantly affect the odds of fracture.
CONCLUSION: The odds of sustaining a PPFFx following revision THA is three times greater compared to primary THA. Other risk factors including gender and cementation did not affect the odds of fracture.
© 2019 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  periprosthetic femoral fracture; primary hip arthroplasty; revision hip arthroplasty; risk factor; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31617684     DOI: 10.1111/ans.15473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  4 in total

1.  What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Richard N de Steiger; Peter L Lewis; Ian Harris; Michelle F Lorimer; Stephen E Graves
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Factors affecting the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures following primary and revision hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christos Bissias; Angelos Kaspiris; Athanasios Kalogeropoulos; Konstantinos Papoutsis; Nikolaos Natsioulas; Konstantinos Barbagiannis; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Olga D Savvidou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Should age be a factor in treatment choice of periprosthetic Vancouver B2-B3 proximal femur fractures? A retrospective analysis of mortality and functional outcomes in elderly patients.

Authors:  Gianluca Canton; Nicholas Rasio; Mauro Garlatti; Chiara Ratti; Anže Kristan; Luigi Murena
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-03-10

Review 4.  Clinical and radiological outcomes in three-dimensional printing assisted revision total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Jiajun Lin; Fenyong Chen; Wenge Liu; Min Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.