Literature DB >> 31617088

Is robotic right colectomy economically sustainable? a multicentre retrospective comparative study and cost analysis.

Giovanni Merola1, Antonio Sciuto2,3, Felice Pirozzi2, Jacopo Andreuccetti4, Giusto Pignata4,5, Francesco Corcione1, Marco Milone1, Giovanni Domenico De Palma1, Rossana Castaldo6, Leandro Pecchia6, Graziano Ceccarelli7,8, Umberto Bracale9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Following the Food and Drug Administration approval, robot-assisted colorectal surgery has gained more acceptance among surgeons. One of the open issues about robotic surgery is the economic sustainability. The aim of our study is to evaluate the economic sustainability of robotic as compared to laparoscopic right colectomy for the Italian National Health System.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicentre case-matched study including 94 patients for each group from four different Italian surgical departments. An economic evaluation gathered from a real-world data was performed to assess the sustainability of the robotic approach for right colectomy in the Italian National Health System. In particular, a differential cost analysis between the two procedures was performed.
RESULTS: No statistical differences were found between the two groups for postoperative outcomes. After a careful review of the literature on the cost assessment for the operative room, medical devices and hospital stay according with our data, we estimated the followings: (a) the mean operative room cost for robotic group was 2179 ± 476 € vs. 1376 ± 322 € for laparoscopic group; (b) the mean hospital stay cost for robotic group was 3143 ± 1435 € vs. 3292 ± 1123 € for laparoscopic group; and (c) the mean cost for instruments was 6280 € for robotic group vs. 1504 € for laparoscopic group. The total mean cost of robotic right colectomy was 11,576 ± 1915 € vs. 6196 ± 1444 € for laparoscopic right colectomy.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, to date, robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis does not provide any significant clinical advantages, which may justify the additional costs, as compared to its laparoscopic counterpart. Further evolution of robotic technology and experience may lead to a reduction of costs, especially if the robotic platform is used in an appropriate healthcare setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost analysis; Laparoscopic surgery; Real-world data; Right colectomy; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31617088     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07193-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  Robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Roberto Peltrini; Francesco Corcione; Daniela Pacella; Simone Castiglioni; Ruggero Lionetti; Jacopo Andreuccetti; Giusto Pignata; Carlo De Nisco; Luca Ferraro; Adelona Salaj; Giampaolo Formisano; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Umberto Bracale
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 2.  Transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  U Bracale; F Corcione; D Neola; S Castiglioni; G Cavallaro; C Stabilini; E Botteri; M Sodo; N Imperatore; R Peltrini
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 3.  Short- and Long-Term Outcome of Laparoscopic- versus Robotic-Assisted Right Colectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peter Tschann; Philipp Szeverinski; Markus P Weigl; Stephanie Rauch; Daniel Lechner; Stephanie Adler; Paolo N C Girotti; Patrick Clemens; Veronika Tschann; Jaroslav Presl; Philipp Schredl; Christof Mittermair; Tarkan Jäger; Klaus Emmanuel; Ingmar Königsrainer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Robotic or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and intracorporeal anastomosis? A propensity score-matching study comparison.

Authors:  Graziano Ceccarelli; Gianluca Costa; Valentina Ferraro; Michele De Rosa; Fabio Rondelli; Walter Bugiantella
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The Financial Burden of Setting up a Pediatric Robotic Surgery Program.

Authors:  Eugen Sorin Boia; Vlad Laurentiu David
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Long splenic flexure carcinoma requiring laparoscopic extended left hemicolectomy with CME and transverse-rectal anastomosis: technique for a modified partial Deloyers in 5 steps to achieve enough reach and preserving middle colic vessels.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Kostantinos Stasinos; Weronyka Stupalkowska; Umberto Bracale; Pierpaolo Sileri; Antonio Giuliani; Giuseppe Nigri; Efstratios Kouroumpas; James M D Wheeler; Giovanni Domenico Tebala; Francesco Di Marzo; Belinda De Simone; Carlos Pastor Idoate; Nicola De Angelis; Roberto Cirocchi; Patricia Tejedor
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Comparison of health-care utilization and expenditures for minimally invasive vs. open colectomy for benign disease.

Authors:  Sarah E Diaz; Yongjin F Lee; Amir L Bastawrous; I-Fan Shih; Shih-Hao Lee; Yanli Li; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 8.  Short-term outcomes in robot-assisted compared to laparoscopic colon cancer resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedja Cuk; Mie Dilling Kjær; Christian Backer Mogensen; Michael Festersen Nielsen; Andreas Kristian Pedersen; Mark Bremholm Ellebæk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Robotic left-stapled total intracorporeal bowel anastomosis versus stapled partial extracorporeal anastomosis: operative technical description and outcomes.

Authors:  Hannah M Hollandsworth; Kevin Li; Beiqun Zhao; Benjamin Abbadessa; Nicole E Lopez; Lisa Parry; Sonia Ramamoorthy; Samuel Eisenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hajime Morohashi; Yoshiyuki Sakamoto; Takuya Miura; Takuji Kagiya; Kenta Ogasawara; Yoshiya Takahashi; Kentaro Sato; Yutaro Hara; Hirokazu Ogasawara; Kenichi Hakamada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.