| Literature DB >> 31617036 |
Nándor Nemestóthy1, Péter Bakonyi2, Péter Komáromy1, Katalin Bélafi-Bakó1.
Abstract
The effects of the bioreactor conditions, in particular the mode and intensity of aeration and mixing were studied on itaconic acid (IA) fermentation efficiency by Aspergillus terreus strain from glucose substrate. IA was produced in batch system by systematically varying the oxygen content of the aeration gas (from 21 to 31.5 vol% O2) and the stirring rate (from 150 to 600 rpm). The data were analyzed kinetically to characterize the behavior of the process, and besides, the performances were evaluated comparatively with the literature. It turned out that the operation of the bioreactor with either the higher inlet O2 concentration (31.5 vol% O2) or faster stirring (600 rpm) could enhance biological IA generation the most, resulting in yield and volumetric productivity of 0.31 g IA/g glucose and 0.32 g IA/g glucose and 3.15 g IA/L day and 4.26 g IA/L day, respectively. Overall, the significance of fermentation settings was shown in this work regarding IA production catalyzed by A. terreus and notable advances could be realized by adjusting the aeration and stirring towards an optimal combination.Entities:
Keywords: Aeration; Itaconic acid fermentation; Kinetic modeling; Process enhancement; Stirring
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31617036 PMCID: PMC6828833 DOI: 10.1007/s10529-019-02742-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Lett ISSN: 0141-5492 Impact factor: 2.461
The experimental plan performed in this study
| Setting | Aeration gas flow rate (L/min) | O2 content of aeration gas (vol%) | Stirring rate (rpm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (Control) | – | – | – |
| 2 (Reference) | 2 | 21 | 150 |
| 3 | 2 | 22.05 | 150 |
| 4 | 2 | 31.5 | 150 |
| 5 | 2 | 21 | 600 |
Fig. 1Time profiles for itaconic acid fermentation under various aeriation and mixing conditions. Symbols are according to Table 1: diamonds—setting 1 (control); squares—setting 2 (reference); triangles—setting 3; crosses—setting 4; asterisks—setting 5
Experimental itaconic acid concentrations obtained under the fermentation conditions listed in Table 1
| Time (h) | 1 (Control) | 2 (Reference) | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 72 | 0.31 | 5.63 | 3.4 | 20.01 | 18.11 |
| 144 | 0.87 | 18.69 | 14.32 | 25.61 | 29.68 |
| 216 | 1.67 | 24.23 | 28.73 | 35.07 | 38.34 |
| 288 | 24.21 | 31.92 | 37.79 |
Fig. 2Experimental values (diamonds) versus model data (squares) using the modified Gompertz-equation for itaconic acid production
Results of the kinetic evaluation conducted on the experimental results summarized in Table 2
| Model parameter | 1 (Control) | 2 (Reference) | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P (g/L) | 3.8 | 24.9 | 35.4 | 37.6 | 39.8 |
| Rm (g/L–h) | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.27 |
| λ (h) | 66.1 | 46.7 | 70.8 | −3.17 | 8.8 |
Fig. 3The attainable itaconic acid volumetric productivities and yields under the experimental circumstances specified in Table 1
Fig. 4The correlation of itaconic acid volumetric productivity and yield obtained in this work