Sarah A Flowers1, Oliver C Grant2, Robert J Woods2, G William Rebeck1. 1. Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, 3970 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington DC 20007, USA. 2. Biochemistry and Molecular Chemistry, Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, 315 Riverbend Rd, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Abstract
The O-glycoprotein apolipoprotein E (APOE), the strongest genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, associates with lipoproteins. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) APOE binds only high-density lipoproteins (HDLs), while plasma APOE attaches to lipoproteins of diverse sizes with binding fine-tuned by the C-terminal loop. To better understand the O-glycosylation on this critical molecule and differences across tissues, we analyzed the O-glycosylation on APOE isolated from the plasma and CSF of aged individuals. Detailed LC-MS/MS analyses allowed the identification of the glycosite and the attached glycan and site occupancy for all detectable glycosites on APOE and further three-dimensional modeling of physiological glycoforms of APOE. APOE is O-glycosylated at several sites: Thr8, Thr18, Thr194, Ser197, Thr289, Ser290 and Ser296. Plasma APOE held more abundant (20.5%) N-terminal (Thr8) sialylated core 1 (Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-3GalNAcα1-) glycosylation compared to CSF APOE (0.1%). APOE was hinge domain glycosylated (Thr194 and Ser197) in both CSF (27.3%) and plasma (10.3%). CSF APOE held almost 10-fold more abundant C-terminal (Thr289, Ser290 and Ser296) glycosylation (36.8% of CSF peptide283-299 was glycosylated, 3.8% of plasma peptide283-299), with sialylated and disialylated (Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-3(Neu5Acα2-6) GalNAcα1-) core 1 structures. Modeling suggested that C-terminal glycosylation, particularly the branched disialylated structure, could interact across domains including the receptor-binding domain. These data, although limited by sample size, suggest that there are tissue-specific APOE glycoforms. Sialylated glycans, previously shown to improve HDL binding, are more abundant on the lipid-binding domain of CSF APOE and reduced in plasma APOE. This indicates that APOE glycosylation may be implicated in lipoprotein-binding flexibility.
The O-glycoprotein apolipoprotein E (n class="Gene">APOE), the strongest genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, associates with lipoproteins. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) APOE binds only high-density lipoproteins (HDLs), while plasma APOE attaches to lipoproteins of diverse sizes with binding fine-tuned by the C-terminal loop. To better understand the O-glycosylation on this critical molecule and differences across tissues, we analyzed the O-glycosylation on APOE isolated from the plasma and CSF of aged individuals. Detailed LC-MS/MS analyses allowed the identification of the glycosite and the attached glycan and site occupancy for all detectable glycosites on APOE and further three-dimensional modeling of physiological glycoforms of APOE. APOE is O-glycosylated at several sites: Thr8, Thr18, Thr194, Ser197, Thr289, Ser290 and Ser296. Plasma APOE held more abundant (20.5%) N-terminal (Thr8) sialylated core 1 (Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-3GalNAcα1-) glycosylation compared to CSF APOE (0.1%). APOE was hinge domain glycosylated (Thr194 and Ser197) in both CSF (27.3%) and plasma (10.3%). CSF APOE held almost 10-fold more abundant C-terminal (Thr289, Ser290 and Ser296) glycosylation (36.8% of CSF peptide283-299 was glycosylated, 3.8% of plasma peptide283-299), with sialylated and disialylated (Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-3(Neu5Acα2-6) GalNAcα1-) core 1 structures. Modeling suggested that C-terminal glycosylation, particularly the branched disialylated structure, could interact across domains including the receptor-binding domain. These data, although limited by sample size, suggest that there are tissue-specific APOE glycoforms. Sialylated glycans, previously shown to improve HDL binding, are more abundant on the lipid-binding domain of CSF APOE and reduced in plasma APOE. This indicates that APOE glycosylation may be implicated in lipoprotein-binding flexibility.
Authors: Kathrin Stavenhagen; Hannes Hinneburg; Morten Thaysen-Andersen; Laura Hartmann; Daniel Varón Silva; Jens Fuchser; Stephanie Kaspar; Erdmann Rapp; Peter H Seeberger; Daniel Kolarich Journal: J Mass Spectrom Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 1.982
Authors: M J LaDu; S M Gilligan; J R Lukens; V G Cabana; C A Reardon; L J Van Eldik; D M Holtzman Journal: J Neurochem Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: A Lalazar; K H Weisgraber; S C Rall; H Giladi; T L Innerarity; A Z Levanon; J K Boyles; B Amit; M Gorecki; R W Mahley Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1988-03-15 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Nicolette Mary Heinsinger; Mariam Alexandra Gachechiladze; G William Rebeck Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: J C Lambert; C A Ibrahim-Verbaas; D Harold; A C Naj; R Sims; C Bellenguez; A L DeStafano; J C Bis; G W Beecham; B Grenier-Boley; G Russo; T A Thorton-Wells; N Jones; A V Smith; V Chouraki; C Thomas; M A Ikram; D Zelenika; B N Vardarajan; Y Kamatani; C F Lin; A Gerrish; H Schmidt; B Kunkle; M L Dunstan; A Ruiz; M T Bihoreau; S H Choi; C Reitz; F Pasquier; C Cruchaga; D Craig; N Amin; C Berr; O L Lopez; P L De Jager; V Deramecourt; J A Johnston; D Evans; S Lovestone; L Letenneur; F J Morón; D C Rubinsztein; G Eiriksdottir; K Sleegers; A M Goate; N Fiévet; M W Huentelman; M Gill; K Brown; M I Kamboh; L Keller; P Barberger-Gateau; B McGuiness; E B Larson; R Green; A J Myers; C Dufouil; S Todd; D Wallon; S Love; E Rogaeva; J Gallacher; P St George-Hyslop; J Clarimon; A Lleo; A Bayer; D W Tsuang; L Yu; M Tsolaki; P Bossù; G Spalletta; P Proitsi; J Collinge; S Sorbi; F Sanchez-Garcia; N C Fox; J Hardy; M C Deniz Naranjo; P Bosco; R Clarke; C Brayne; D Galimberti; M Mancuso; F Matthews; S Moebus; P Mecocci; M Del Zompo; W Maier; H Hampel; A Pilotto; M Bullido; F Panza; P Caffarra; B Nacmias; J R Gilbert; M Mayhaus; L Lannefelt; H Hakonarson; S Pichler; M M Carrasquillo; M Ingelsson; D Beekly; V Alvarez; F Zou; O Valladares; S G Younkin; E Coto; K L Hamilton-Nelson; W Gu; C Razquin; P Pastor; I Mateo; M J Owen; K M Faber; P V Jonsson; O Combarros; M C O'Donovan; L B Cantwell; H Soininen; D Blacker; S Mead; T H Mosley; D A Bennett; T B Harris; L Fratiglioni; C Holmes; R F de Bruijn; P Passmore; T J Montine; K Bettens; J I Rotter; A Brice; K Morgan; T M Foroud; W A Kukull; D Hannequin; J F Powell; M A Nalls; K Ritchie; K L Lunetta; J S Kauwe; E Boerwinkle; M Riemenschneider; M Boada; M Hiltuenen; E R Martin; R Schmidt; D Rujescu; L S Wang; J F Dartigues; R Mayeux; C Tzourio; A Hofman; M M Nöthen; C Graff; B M Psaty; L Jones; J L Haines; P A Holmans; M Lathrop; M A Pericak-Vance; L J Launer; L A Farrer; C M van Duijn; C Van Broeckhoven; V Moskvina; S Seshadri; J Williams; G D Schellenberg; P Amouyel Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2013-10-27 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Rosalía Fernández-Calle; Sabine C Konings; Javier Frontiñán-Rubio; Juan García-Revilla; Lluís Camprubí-Ferrer; Martina Svensson; Isak Martinson; Antonio Boza-Serrano; José Luís Venero; Henrietta M Nielsen; Gunnar K Gouras; Tomas Deierborg Journal: Mol Neurodegener Date: 2022-09-24 Impact factor: 18.879
Authors: Yuka A Martens; Na Zhao; Chia-Chen Liu; Takahisa Kanekiyo; Austin J Yang; Alison M Goate; David M Holtzman; Guojun Bu Journal: Neuron Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 18.688