| Literature DB >> 31616688 |
Qiu-Yun Liu1, Qi Duan2, Xiao-Hong Fu1, Mei Jiang3, Hong-Wei Xia1, Yong-Lin Wan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early prediction of transient ischemic attack (TIA) has important clinical value. To date, systematic studies on clinical, biochemical, and imaging indicators related to carotid atherosclerosis have been carried out to predict the occurrence of TIA. However, their prediction accuracy is limited. AIM: To explore the role of combining wall shear stress (WSS) with conventional predictive indicators in improving the accuracy of TIA prediction.Entities:
Keywords: Acute ischemic stroke; Atherosclerosis; Plaque; Transient ischemic attack; Wall shear stress
Year: 2019 PMID: 31616688 PMCID: PMC6789401 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2722
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Cases ISSN: 2307-8960 Impact factor: 1.337
Figure 1Wall shear stress at the carotid plaque plotted with the shear stress quantitative analysis software. A: Schematic representation of the proximal and distal end of the carotid plaque; B: Wall shear stress (WSS) spatial distribution map at the carotid plaque shoulder plotted with the shear stress quantitative analysis software; C: WSS three-dimensional spatial distribution at the carotid plaque shoulder plotted with the shear stress quantitative analysis software.
Figure 2Wall shear stress distribution at the plaque generated with the shear stress quantitative analysis software. The patient in the figure was a 52-year-old woman. Ultrasound examination showed mixed plaque in the internal carotid artery. The stenosis degree in the internal carotid artery was 35%. A: Color Doppler blood flow pattern at the internal carotid artery plaque; B: Two-dimensional wall shear stress (WSS) spatial distribution at the internal carotid artery plaque; C: Three-dimensional WSS spatial distribution at the internal carotid artery plaque.
Figure 3Bland-Altman analysis of wall shear stress by two sonographers. A: Consistency analysis of wall shear stress (WSS) at the proximal end of the plaque shoulder; B: Consistency analysis of WSS at the distal end of the plaque shoulder.
Figure 4Transient ischemic attack occurrence during follow-up in patients with atherosclerosis (Kaplan-Meier method).
Comparison of clinical data and laboratory indicators between the two groups, n (%)
| Age | 70.71 ± 10.92 | 65.93 ± 18.09 | 1.408 | 0.160 |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 18/12 | 126/78 | 0.034 | 0.853 |
| Family history | 4 (13.33) | 21(10.29%) | - | 0.539 |
| Hypertension | 30 (100) | 178 (87.25) | 4.301 | 0.038 |
| Diabetes | 22 (73.33) | 104 (50.98) | 5.258 | 0.022 |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 10 (33.33) | 69 (33.82) | 0.003 | 0.958 |
| Smoking | 14 (46.67) | 104 (50.98) | 0.195 | 0.659 |
| Alcoholism | 4 (13.33) | 21 (10.29) | - | 0.539 |
| DBIT (μmol/L) | 4.19 ± 1.08 | 3.98 ± 1.43 | 0.772 | 0.441 |
| TBIL (μmol/L) | 10.96 ± 3.96 | 9.77 ± 3.28 | 1.805 | 0.072 |
| UA (mmol/L) | 329.34 ± 84.39 | 337.09 ± 87.18 | 0.456 | 0.649 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.18 ± 0.43 | 1.15 ± 0.47 | 0.330 | 0.742 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.46 ± 1.20 | 4.29 ± 1.09 | 0.787 | 0.432 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.17 ± 0.32 | 1.22 ± 0.34 | 0.757 | 0.459 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.04 ± 0.95 | 2.89 ± 0.87 | 0.871 | 0.384 |
| Hcy (μmol/L) | 8.37 ± 2.76 | 7.29 ± 2.27 | 2.364 | 0.019 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 6.97 ± 2.89 | 5.84 ± 2.58 | 2.205 | 0.028 |
indicated Fisher's exact probability method. DBIT: Direct bilirubin; TBIL: Total bilirubin; UA: Uric acid; TG: Triglyceride; TC: Total cholesterol; HDL-C: High density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: Low density lipoprotein cholesterol; Hcy: Homocysteine; FBG: Fasting blood glucose.
Comparison of ultrasound characteristics and wall shear stress data between the two groups
| Plaque location | Common carotid artery | 8 | 51 | 0.046 | 0.977 |
| Carotid sinus | 18 | 124 | |||
| Internal carotid artery | 4 | 29 | |||
| Plaque property | Hard plaque | 9 | 104 | 6.062 | 0.048 |
| Soft plaque | 14 | 54 | |||
| Mixed plaque | 7 | 46 | |||
| Lumen stenosis rate (%) | 58.26 ± 13.28 | 44.29 ± 21.82 | 3.411 | 0.001 | |
| PSV (cm/s) | 90.34 ± 9.23 | 87.12 ± 9.42 | 1.753 | 0.081 | |
| EDV (cm/s) | 17.24 ± 5.12 | 15.93 ± 3.82 | 1.673 | 0.096 | |
| Proximal end WSS (dyne/cm2) | 9.15 ± 2.27 | 7.29 ± 3.86 | 6.720 | 0.000 | |
| Distal end WSS (dyne/cm2) | 7.42 ± 1.95 | 6.39 ± 1.74 | 2.980 | 0.003 | |
PSV: Peak systolic velocity; EDV: End diastolic velocity; WSS: Wall shear stress.
COX multivariate analysis of transient ischemic attack in patients with atherosclerosis during follow-up
| Hypertension | 1.365 | 0.293 | 2.813 | 0.037 | 3.914 | 2.204 | 6.951 |
| Diabetes | 1.462 | 0.428 | 3.792 | 0.026 | 4.316 | 1.865 | 9.986 |
| Hcy | 0.492 | 0.245 | 3.988 | 0.022 | 1.635 | 1.012 | 2.643 |
| FBG | 0.390 | 0.176 | 2.918 | 0.034 | 1.477 | 1.046 | 2.085 |
| Plaque property | 1.786 | 0.496 | 7.294 | 0.000 | 5.968 | 2.257 | 15.777 |
| Lumen stenosis rate (%) | 1.675 | 0.328 | 6.028 | 0.000 | 5.337 | 2.806 | 10.151 |
| Proximal end WSS (dyne/cm2) | 0.783 | 0.272 | 5.885 | 0.000 | 2.187 | 1.283 | 3.727 |
| Distal end WSS (dyne/cm2) | 0.459 | 0.482 | 1.125 | 0.192 | 1.582 | 0.615 | 4.069 |
Hcy: Homocysteine; FBG: Fasting blood glucose; WSS: Wall shear stress.
ROC curve analysis of potential indicators for predicting TIA
| FBG | 0.726 | 0.664-0.782 | 6.23 | 66.67 | 68.14 |
| Hcy | 0.711 | 0.648-0.768 | 7.65 | 90.00 | 42.16 |
| Lumen stenosis rate | 0.832 | 0.778-0.877 | 62.01 | 96.67 | 54.41 |
| proximal end WSS | 0.884 | 0.831-0.917 | 8.05 | 73.33 | 95.51 |
FBG: Fasting blood glucose; Hcy: Homocysteine; WSS: Wall shear stress.
Figure 5Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of potential indicators for predicting transient ischemic attack individually.
Figure 6Receiver operating characteristic curves of combined indicator with wall shear stress vs combined indicator without wall shear stress.