| Literature DB >> 31616481 |
Marco Parolini1, Cristina Daniela Possenti1, Andrea Romano1,2, Manuela Caprioli1, Diego Rubolini1, Nicola Saino1.
Abstract
The perinatal period is critical to survival and performance of many organisms. In birds, rapid postnatal growth and sudden exposure to aerial oxygen around hatching markedly affect the chick redox status, with potentially negative consequences on physiology mediated by oxidative stress. In addition, telomere length (TL) undergoes reduction during birds' early life, partly depending on oxidative status. However, relatively few studies have focused specifically on the changes in oxidative status and TL that occur immediately after hatching. In this study of the yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis, we found that chicks undergo a marked increase in plasma total antioxidant capacity and a marked decrease in the concentration of pro-oxidant molecules during the first days after hatching. In addition, TL in erythrocytes decreased by 1 standard deviation over the 4 days post-hatching. Body mass and tarsus length covaried with total antioxidant capacity and concentration of pro-oxidants in a complex way, that partly depended on sex and laying order, suggesting that oxidative status can affect growth. Moreover, TL positively covaried with the concentration of pro-oxidant molecules, possibly because retention of high concentrations of pro-oxidant molecules results from mechanisms of prevention of their negative effects, including reduction in TL. Thus, this study shows that chicks undergo marked variation in oxidative status, which predicts growth and subsequent TL, prompting for more studies of the perinatal changes in the critical post-hatching stages.Entities:
Keywords: early-life period; oxidative status; telomeres; yellow-legged gull
Year: 2018 PMID: 31616481 PMCID: PMC6784506 DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoy084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Zool ISSN: 1674-5507 Impact factor: 2.624
Linear mixed models of egg mass variation at laying and at the eggshell cracking stage in relation to embryo sex and laying order
|
|
|
| Coefficient/Marginal mean (SE) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laying stage | |||||
| Sex | 0.52 | 1, 87 | 0.474 | Males: | 88.78 (0.98) |
| Females: | 87.95 (1.08) | ||||
| Laying order | 12.42 | 1, 87 | <0.001 | a-eggs: | 90.40 (1.06) |
| b-eggs: | 90.01 (0.94) | ||||
| c-eggs: | 84.69 (1.24) | ||||
| Laying date | 0.18 | 1, 87 | 0.672 | −0.085 (0.201) | |
| Eggshell cracking stage | |||||
| Sex | 1.04 | 1, 86 | 0.310 | Males: | 78.36 (0.97) |
| Females: | 77.10 (1.09) | ||||
| Laying order | 11.19 | 1, 86 | <0.001 | a-eggs: | 79.93 (1.06) |
| b-eggs: | 79.38 (0.95) | ||||
| c-eggs: | 73.88 (1.27) | ||||
| Laying date | 0.15 | 1, 86 | 0.700 | 0.075 (0.193) | |
Nest identity was included as a random effect in the model. The sex by laying order interaction effect was removed as it was non-significant. Sample sizes for a-, b-, and c-eggs was 34, 38, and 20, respectively. Sample size for males and females was 55 and 37, respectively. Information on mass at cracking stage was missing for 1 egg.
*c-eggs were significantly smaller than a- and b-eggs at post hoc LSD tests.
Repeated-measures linear mixed model of body mass, tarsus length, plasma antioxidant capacity, concentration of pro-oxidant molecules and TL at hatching and at 4 days of age
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body mass | |||
| Sex | 5.98 | 1, 88 | 0.017 |
| Laying order | 6.51 | 2, 88 | 0.002 |
| Age | 946.74 | 1, 90 | <0.001 |
| Sex × Age | 3.89 | 1, 90 | 0.051 |
| Tarsus length | |||
| Sex | 3.73 | 1, 88 | 0.057 |
| Laying order | 9.00 | 2, 88 | <0.001 |
| Age | 717.48 | 1, 91 | <0.001 |
| TOS | |||
| Sex | 0.04 | 1, 86 | 0.851 |
| Laying order | 0.22 | 2, 86 | 0.801 |
| Age | 42.72 | 1, 89 | <0.001 |
| TAC | |||
| Sex | 1.51 | 1, 85 | 0.222 |
| Laying order | 2.02 | 2, 85 | 0.140 |
| Age | 90.08 | 1, 88 | <0.001 |
| RTL | |||
| Sex | 0.36 | 1, 86 | 0.551 |
| Laying order | 1.06 | 2, 86 | 0.351 |
| Age | 51.31 | 1, 89 | <0.001 |
Nest identity was included as a random effect in the models. The interaction terms between sex, laying order and age that were non-significant were excluded from the models. Sample sizes for a-, b-, and c-eggs was 34, 38, 20, respectively. Sample size for males and females was 55 and 37, respectively. Information was missing for 2 chicks for pro-oxidant molecules (i.e., TOS) and RTL and for 3 chicks for TAC.
Figure 1.Mean (+ SE bar) body mass (g), tarsus length (mm), plasma concentration of pro-oxidant molecules (nM H2O2 Equivalent), plasma total antioxidant capacity (µM Trolox Equivalent) and RTL measured on chicks at age 0 and at age 4 days after hatching, according to sex and laying order. The number of chicks in each class is shown. See Results and Table 2 for the statistics of the effects of sex and age.
Linear mixed models of body mass, tarsus length, and TL at age 4 days in relation to phenotypic traits at age 0, that is, at hatching
|
|
|
| Coefficients ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body mass at Day 4 ( | ||||
| Sex | 0.38 | 1, 77 | 0.540 | |
| Laying order | 4.05 | 2, 77 | 0.021 | |
| Body mass at hatching | 21.81 | 1, 77 | <0.001 | 1.318 (0.282)* |
| TAC at age 0 | 14.20 | 1, 77 | <0.001 | |
| TOS at age 0 | 0.37 | 1, 77 | 0.545 | |
| Sex × TOS at age 0 | 4.63 | 1, 77 | 0.035 | males: 0.012 (0.007); females: 3.0 × 10−4 (0.009) |
| Sex × TAC at age 0 | 5.08 | 1, 77 | 0.027 | males: −0.019 (0.004)*; females: −0.005 (0.005) |
| Laying order × TOS at age 0 | 3.20 | 2, 77 | 0.046 | a-chicks: 0.001 (0.005); b-chicks: −0.013 (0.005)*; c-chicks: 0.012 (0.006) |
| Tarsus length at Day 4 ( | ||||
| Sex | 0.36 | 1, 79 | 0.548 | |
| Laying order | 14.43 | 2, 79 | <0.001 | |
| Tarsus length at hatching | 11.21 | 1, 79 | 0.001 | 0.604 (0.180)* |
| TAC at age 0 | 6.96 | 1, 79 | 0.010 | −0.010 (0.004)* |
| TOS at age 0 | 1.47 | 1, 79 | 0.229 | |
| Laying order × TOS at age 0 | 8.88 | 2, 79 | <0.001 | a-chicks: 0.011 (0.005)*; b-chicks: −0.014 (0.005)*; c-chicks: 0.017(0.009)* |
| TL at Day 4 ( | ||||
| Sex | 1.12 | 1, 80 | 0.292 | |
| Laying order | 1.75 | 2, 80 | 0.181 | |
| TL at hatching | 10.27 | 1, 80 | 0.002 | 0.383 (0.120)* |
| TAC at age 0 | 1.16 | 1, 80 | 0.284 | |
| TOS at age 0 | 6.70 | 1, 80 | 0.012 | 6 × 10 − 5 (2 × 10−5)* |
Nest identity was included as a random effect. Only main effects and significant 2-way interaction effects are retained in the models (see statistical analyses)
*Indicate that the coefficient significantly differed from 0.
Figure 2.Body mass at age 4 days in relation to plasma concentration of pro-oxidant molecules (nM H2O2 Equivalent; upper panel) or plasma total antioxidant capacity (µM Trolox Equivalent; lower panel) in male and female chicks at age 0. The slopes of the relationships for either sex significantly differed (see also Results). Simple linear regression lines are fitted to better illustrate the sex-specific trends.
Figure 3.Tarsus length at age 4 days in relation to plasma concentration of pro-oxidant molecules in chicks of different laying order (nM H2O2 Equivalent; upper panel) and in relation to plasma total antioxidant capacity (µM Trolox Equivalent; lower panel) at age 0. The relationship with plasma total antioxidant capacity was negative. The relationship with the concentration of pro-oxidant molecules significantly varied according to laying order. Simple linear regression lines are fitted to better illustrate the trends.
Figure 4.RTL at age 4 days in relation to RTL (upper panel; N = 90) and in relation to plasma concentration of pro-oxidant molecules (nM H2O2 Equivalent; lower panel; N = 89) at hatching. In both panels, the simple linear regression lines (continuous) are fitted to better illustrate the trends. In the upper panel, the dashed line represents equivalence of RTL at either age. In the graphs, we included all the bivariate data available, justifying the slight discrepancy in sample sizes between the model in Table 3 and the figure.