| Literature DB >> 31616422 |
Alexander Rebl1, Henrike Rebl2, Marieke Verleih1, Stephanie Haupt1, Judith M Köbis1, Tom Goldammer1, Hans-Martin Seyfert1.
Abstract
The interleukin-1-receptor-associated kinase 3 (Entities:
Keywords: CHSE-214; GFP expression plasmid; IRAK-3; Toll-like receptor signaling; salmonid fishes
Year: 2019 PMID: 31616422 PMCID: PMC6763605 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Gene-specific primers used for RT-qPCR assays.
| LN828695 | TGGACTCGTCTATGTACCTGTAT | GCGCCATCCGAGGCTGTCAT | 99.3 | 95 | |
| LR031305 | CCCTGCTGAGAAACGTCCTAC | GGTCTGTTGCGTGGTCGTGTA | 99.2 | 162 | |
| NM_001281424 | GATCTGAGGATGGGAAGGTCTA | CTGCCGTGGATGAAGAGTCTAA | 98.0 | 154 | |
| AJ878917 | GTGGTACAGCCTCAGTGGCA | GCTGATAGACTGTGGGCATGA | 106.3 | 131 | |
| XM_021615844 | CAAACCCTCTGACCAGGACCC | GCCTGGGCGGGACTTCATGG | 93.8 | 220 | |
| XM_021576327 | CTTCAAGTTCTGCGTTTGTACACA | CTTGACCGCTTTCAGCAGGTTA | 98.4 | 139 | |
| XM_021609985 | GACGAGTGGTTTCTGATTGATAG | TTGTCAACAGGGCCGGGATAG | 101.0 | 119 | |
| NM_001124379 | AAGGAATGACGAACGGCAAACG | TCAGCTGTCTCACAGTAGTACAT | 100.9 | 169 | |
| XM_021564396 | GAAGTGATGAACGGCCGATATAA | ACCACTTCACATACAGGAACTCT | 99.6 | 152 | |
| XM_021593383 | ACCCAGTGTTTGCAAGAGAACC | CAGTTGGCGATCAGAGAGACG | 101.1 | 167 | |
| XR_002473365 | GCTGGACCAAGACACTTGGC | CACCAACCCCCGGTAGAGG | 102.1 | 166 | |
| XM_021606996 | GATTGAGTGGGCAAAGTATTGTAT | AGCAATGTTATGTAACAGGGTATG | 98.1 | 167 | |
| XM_021582312 | GGGAGGAAGGATGAGATGAGTA | GGTCCTGAAGCTCCACTGTTAG | 101.1 | 184 | |
| NM_001124368 | AACCCTGGAGGAAAACAGTGAC | CGCCGTCTGTCTCTGATTGTTC | 100.6 | 153 | |
| XM_021574049 | TGAAGTTGTCGCCAGTGAGCTC | GGCTCATTGCAGGACAGCTCT | 105.0 | 187 | |
| XM_021600117 | AGAGTGGCCAATGTCGAAGTCT | TTGTGCGTCCAGTAACATATTATC | 97.1 | 175 | |
| NM_001124347 | GAGAGTGCTGTGGAAGAACATAT | GCAGCTCCATAGCCTCATTCAT | 100.0 | 157 | |
| AJ279069 | CTGAGGGGATGAGTCTGAGAG | ATCTCCTGACCGCTCTTGCTC | 105.1 | 169 | |
| NM_001246341 | CTGTCAGAGGAACTTCTGGAAAC | TCACCAAACGCGTCATTTTTCAC | 101.7 | 131 | |
| XM_021591332 | ATCAGGGATGAACAAGCTGAGG | TTCGCACACAGCAACTCTCCG | 72.0 | 161 | |
| XM_021563342 | CATTCCAAGGTGCTAGGTCTGT | TCTTGGGGGTCTTGCCGATGT | 99.9 | 121 | |
| NM_001146166 | ACGGATTCTGCGTCGGAAAATAT | ACACAGTTCCCTGGCATCCGT | 104.4 | 92 | |
| XR_002474449 | TCCCTGACCTGACCTACGAC | GGCCTCCTCCATTAAACCTC | 100.1 | 201 | |
| XM_021609929 | AACTGAGGATGCTGGAGAACGT | GCACGCCGAAGTAGCGGTAG | 100.0 | 96 |
Figure 1Representation of the different irak3-transcript lengths. The irak3-variants of trout are listed together with their accession numbers and their tissue-wise occurrence on the left. Tissues are abbreviated as follows: Bo, bone; Br, brain; E, unfertilized eggs; G, gills; HK, head kidney; L, liver; S, spleen; T, thymus. The genomic organization of the trout irak3 gene is drawn above the scheme. Exons are represented by colored boxes (red, death domain; green, ProST region; light blue, pseudokinase domain; dark blue, C-terminal domain). Lines between exons represent introns. A cross indicates that the respective exon is present in the listed transcript variant; if the exon length differs from the prototypic length, the actual length is given (in nt); a superscript p denotes a partial 3′-end. The position where a fragment of intron 8 was inserted in the predicted irak3 variant (3) is marked with a gray arrow. Asterisks indicate the possible usage of alternative splice acceptor/donor sites. The color of the characters denotes a particular protein domain. Fields highlighted in yellow indicate clones, which were functionally analyzed in later experiments (see Figures 5–7).
Figure 5Overexpression of full-length factor Irak3 m and variants a, and m″ in HEK-293 cells. (A) Human HEK-293 cells were transfected with plasmids expressing the GFP-tagged Irak3 variants, the full-length factor m, truncated factor a, and splice variant m″. Cells were visualized 24 h after transfection with a confocal laser-scanning microscope. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bars represent 10 μm in all images. (B) Profile of fluorescence intensities (ordinate) recorded at specific locations (abscissa) across the cell following that path as indicated by the dotted arrows in 4A. (C) Live/dead assay of HEK-293 cells quantified the proportion of dead cells in the total cell count after the overexpression of full-length Irak3-m, truncated Irak3-a or spliced Irak3-m″ factors. The left part of each of the three dot plots shows the number of dead (PI-stained) GFP-negative cells and the right part shows the number of living GFP-positive (irak3-expressing) cells. One representative result is shown.
Figure 7Expression profiling of stimulated Irak3-overexpressing CHSE-214 cells. The HeatMap illustrates the averaged fold-change values (according to the legend on the right) of the mRNA concentrations measured in CHSE cells 6 h after stimulation with 10 μg/ml poly (I:C) and 100 ng/ml flagellin, relative to unstimulated control cells (set as 1.0). The quantified transcripts are listed as gene symbols on the left; orthologs whose expression is IRAK3-dependent in mammals according to Zhou et al. (5) are highlighted in red. Significant copy-number changes (p < 0.05) of stimulated vs. non-stimulated untransfected cells are marked with asterisks; significant copy-number changes of stimulated non-transfected vs. transfected cells are underlined. All expression values were normalized against the geometric means of the reference genes eef1a1 and rps5.
Repetition of DNA elements (at least four-fold) within trout irak3 genes (bases follow the standard IUPAC nucleotide codes).
| 1 | TGAG | 11 | |
| 1 | AT | 16 | |
| 1 | AATSGAATCYGACACCGGASTCCCTAGTCNCTACWGTTA | 7 | |
| 4 | TACMACAGACT(GAT)GWTGTGTTSAGATGGTCCCTAGT | 7 | |
| 4 | GTAGAAACCACAGGCKTAGTGTTTTY(W)NNYYTRTTGCTMR | 4 | |
| 6 | TCTSTATGTCTAMCTACTCCAKTAATCCTCCATTTKAGATKGTT | 14 | |
| 7 | TACTCCASCATTTTAGATGGTTTCTSTATGTCTAMM | 12 | |
| between 7 and 12 | KRACTACYTATAGAC(T)(R) | 18 | |
| between 7 and 12 | TAACWNCCWMTARAN(T)(R) | 29 | |
| 1 | AGTG | 7 | |
| 1 | TA | 19 | |
| 1 | ATACCATGGTACTAMTRKGGTACTTTCATKA | 4 | |
| 3 | TG | 4 | |
| 4 | TACATTAGATTRCTGAG(A) | 25 | |
| 4 | GTAGAAACCACAGGCKTAGTGTTTT(T)YAYTCTGTTKCTAG | 5 | |
| 6 | ATGTCTAMCTACTCCATTAATCCTCCATTTKAGATGGTTTCTGT | ≥5 | |
| 7 | TGTTCCACAGACTGCATGACCAGGTGAGATATTCTATTCTMTACCCCTTACCTTCCCAAYGGATCWC | 4 | |
| 7 | CTATTCTAGTTGTAKGTTGTGTTAC | 9 | |
| 8 | TACCGGCTCAAACCCCTAGTCTATAACATCACAAGG | 8 | |
| 8 | CAGTTAACCCACTGTTCCTAGRC | 5 | |
| 11 | GT | 4 | |
| 11 | RWAGCTWGGTGAATAYY | 31 | |
| 12 | TAACTMCCTATAGAC(TR) | 16 | |
Figure 2(A) Schematic illustration of the irak3-cDNA variants. The encoded protein domains are colored as in Figure 1 (upper panel) and drawn to scale. Flanking light gray lines indicate UTR sequences; the black triangle and square mark the start and stop of the ORF, respectively. Non-synonymous SNCs are represented by longitudinal white lines; the longitudinal red line indicates the point mutation that leads to the shortened variant j. Arrows indicate the locations of the primers used for fragment amplification and the 3′-RACE. The scissors symbol indicates the end of the truncated irak3-cDNAs. (B) List display of the 45 SNCs in trout Irak3-encoding cDNA sequences predicted by RNA-sequencing and those confirmed via cloning. The SNCs are numbered in the first row together with their exon-related occurrences and the exact positions in the ORF, with “1” assigned to the first nucleotide of the translational start triplet. Twenty-three of the SNCs were also confirmed by sequencing 100 randomly picked clones from batch-cloned irak3 amplicons. SNCs not represented in that clone collection are shown in gray characters. Nucleotide variations and the affected aa residues are marked with the same colors (adenine, green; guanine, red; thymine, blue; cytosine, orange). Characteristic domains carrying the affected aa residues are indicated by differently shaded table fields. Note that variants a and c share the same SNCs, but bear an additional nt exchange at position 407 (C) Dendrogram of trout irak3 cDNA variants. The bootstrap analysis of transcript relatedness involved 17 trout-specific nucleotide sequences (abbreviated as numbers and digits as indicated in (B) in the left column of the table).
Figure 3(A) 3′-RACE experiments using sense primers derived from exon 9 of the trout irak3 gene (c.f. Figure 2A) produced two major bands of different length representing fragments of the truncated (marked with an asterisk) and the full-length transcript. DNA-marker bands are shown on the left. (B) Schematic comparison of the full-length (irak3-m) and truncated (irak3-a) transcripts of trout with the predicted Irak3-encoding fragment of salmon. Exons are numbered and sequences are drawn to scale; different colors indicate characteristic Irak3 domains as in Figures 1, 2. The homolog sequence shared by the coding irak3 fragment of the truncated variant and the salmon sequence is indicated with a blue dotted line. The orange dotted line marks the position of the nonamer sequence motif (underlined) not found in the full-length transcript. The alignment of a section containing the nonamer-sequence in the truncated trout sequence (OM; LN828695) and in the salmon sequence (SS; XM_014208880) is shown on the right. Start and end nt positions of the fragments are indicated. The sequence of the RACE primer f2 is shown in blue. The potential accessory splice site is framed in orange; the stop codon of the truncated irak3 transcripts is marked in red. (C) Alignment of the 5′-UTRs of the truncated irak3 transcript from trout (OM; LR213462) and the predicted irak3 sequence from salmon (SS; XM_014208880). Identical bases in the SS sequence are indicated by dots. The retroposon sequence is highlighted in bold.
Figure 4Expression profile of regulatory immune genes during A.-salmonicida infection of rainbow trout. (A) We used discriminating primer pairs to determine the abundance of all irak3 variants in trout (filled columns) and the proportion of the full-length irak3 transcripts (open columns) in the liver (left panel), head kidney (central), and PBLs (right) of four individuals at the various time points after infection relative to uninfected fish (0 h; set as 1.0). Significant copy-number changes (p < 0.05) are marked with an asterisk (*); error bars indicate SEM. (B) The HeatMap illustrates the averaged fold-change values (according to the legend on the right) of the mRNA concentrations measured in the liver (left panel), head kidney (central), and PBLs (right) at the time points after infection indicated below the scheme relative to controls (set as 1.0). The quantified transcripts are listed as gene symbols on the left and categorized according to their affiliation to immune processes; orthologs whose expression is IRAK3-dependent in mammals according to Zhou et al. (5) are marked in red. Significant copy-number changes (p < 0.05) are underlined. All expression values were normalized against the geometric means of the reference genes eef1a1 and rps5 as evaluated with the qBase+ software.
Figure 6Reporter-gene analysis assessing the influence of Irak-3 factors on NF-κB activity in HEK-293 cells. HEK-293 cells were co-transfected with constructs expressing the bovine TLR2 and the mammalian ELAM-driven NF-κB-luciferase reporter together with increasing amounts of the plasmids (gray-scaled columns) that express the irak3 variants m, a, m″, and l. (A) Fold-change values (ordinate) of the basal luciferase activity 24 h after transfection of Irak3-encoding plasmids, relative to the control (open columns) having received the empty plasmid only and no stimulation. The tertiary structures of the transfected irak3 variants are displayed below the diagram. (B,C) Fold-change values of the luciferase activity after stimulation of TLR2 signaling with 10 ng/ml Pam2CSK4 and 100 ng/ml FSL-1 for 24 h, (B) relative to unstimulated control cells having been transfected with the same amount of the respective irak3-encoding plasmids, (C) relative to stimulated control cells transfected with the empty plasmid. Mean values from 2 or 3 independent experiments, each assayed in triplicate, are given. Statistical significance compared with the control group was assessed using one-way ANOVA (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).