| Literature DB >> 31616181 |
Ninu Maskey1, Niresh Thapa2,3, Muna Maharjan4, Girishma Shrestha5, Narayani Maharjan6, Hongbing Cai2, Shangqin Liu1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been extensively described in anti-tumor immunity, but their functional alterations in the immunoediting processes during neoplastic progression in the uterine cervix are still not clear. Our aim was to gain insight into cervical tissue T cell populations, determine if there are any differences in the localization and quantity distribution of T lymphocytes, and to evaluate their role in disease regression or progression in the cervical neoplastic milieu. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serial section analysis of immunohistochemically stained CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes was performed on a total number of 72 samples, categorized into four cohorts: 23 HPV non-infected (HPV-) normal cervix, 20 HPV infected (HPV+) normal cervix, 17 HPV+ low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and 12 HPV+ high grade CIN.Entities:
Keywords: CD4; CD8; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; cervical screening test; human papilloma virus; immunohistochemistry
Year: 2019 PMID: 31616181 PMCID: PMC6698604 DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S217264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Manag Res ISSN: 1179-1322 Impact factor: 3.989
HPV type-specific distribution and CD4, CD8 immunoreactivity score of study group
| Age range (years) | 26–52 | 26–60 | 26–48 | 21–54 |
| Mean age ± SD | 36.04±6.39 | 41.35±8.72 | 36.82±6.74 | 35.25±10.25 |
| HR–HPV typesa | ||||
| 16 | – | 5 | 1 | 2 |
| 18 | – | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 33 | – | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 39 | – | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| 51 | – | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 58 | – | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| LR–HPV typesa | ||||
| 6 | – | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 81 | – | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Other | – | 3 | 10 | 6 |
| Multiple infections | – | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| CD4+ IHC score | ||||
| 1+ | 19 (82.61) | 13 (65) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 2+ | 4 (17.39) | 4 (20) | 9 (52.94) | 0 (0) |
| 3+ | 0 (0) | 3 (15) | 8 (47.06) | 12 (100) |
| CD8+ IHC score | ||||
| 1+ | 21 (91.30) | 13 (65) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 2+ | 2 (8.7) | 4 (20) | 10 (58.82) | 0 (0) |
| 3+ | 0 (0) | 3 (15) | 7 (41.18) | 12 (100) |
Notes: Values shown are number (%) not otherwise specified. aSome women had multiple infections so the sum of frequency of high-risk and low-risk HPV+ is not the total number of HPV+ in each group.
Abbreviations: HR-HPV, high risk HPV; LR-HPV, low risk HPV; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; IHC, immunohistochemistry.
Figure 1Representative images of IHC staining showing low CD4+ILs and CD8+ILs (score 1) in serial sections of HPV- normal cervix (A, B); low CD4+ILs and CD8+ILs (score 1) in serial sections of HPV+ normal cervix showing CD8+ lymphocytes predominantly in epithelial layer (C, D); CD4+TILs and CD8+TILs (score 2) in serial sections of HPV+ low grade CIN, higher than in former cases, showing predominance of CD4 lymphocytes (E, F); high CD4+TILs and CD8+TILs (score 3) in high grade CIN, showing predominance of CD4 lymphocytes (G, H).
Abbreviations: IHC, immunohistochemistry; ILs, infiltrating lymphocytes; TILs, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Association of infiltration rate of lymphocytes between HPV+ normal cervix and CIN of different grades
| Normal cervix (n=20) | 17 (85) | 3 (15) | |
| Low grade CIN (n=17) | 9 (52.94) | 8 (47.06) | <0.0001* |
| High grade CIN (n=12) | 0 (0) | 12 (100) | |
Notes: Values shown are number (%) not otherwise specified. *Represents P<0.05.
Abbreviations: ILs, infiltrating lymphocytes; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Univariate analysis of different variables with the rate of infiltrating lymphocytes
| Biopsy | ||||
| CIN (n=29) | 20 (68.97) | 9 (31.03) | 16.89 (4.98–57.20) | <0.0001* |
| Normal (n=43) | 5 (11.63) | 38 (88.37) | ||
| Age (years) | ||||
| ≥36 (n=38) | 15 (39.47) | 23 (60.53) | 1.57 (0.59–4.19) | 0.372 |
| <35 (n=34) | 10 (29.41) | 24 (70.59) | ||
| Number of child birth | ||||
| >4 (n=30) | 20 (66.67) | 10 (33.33) | 11 (2.04–59.44) | 0.005* |
| 0 or 1 (n=13) | 2 (15.38) | 11 (84.62) | ||
| Smoking | ||||
| Smokers (n=27) | 13 (48.15) | 14 (51.85) | 2.55 (0.94–6.96) | 0.067 |
| Non-smokers (n=45) | 12 (26.67) | 33 (73.33) | ||
| Multiple sexual partners | ||||
| Present (n=19) | 9 (47.37) | 10 (52.63) | 2.08(0.71–6.09) | 0.181 |
| Absent (n=53) | 16 (30.19) | 37 (69.81) | ||
| Contraceptive use | ||||
| Users (n=21) | 11 (52.38) | 10 (47.62) | 2.91 (1.01–8.34) | 0.047* |
| Non-users (n=51) | 14 (27.45) | 37 (72.55) | ||
Notes: Values shown are number (%) not otherwise specified. *Represents P<0.05.
Abbreviations: ILs, infiltrating lymphocytes; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Comparison of localization and quantity distribution between CD4ILs and CD8ILs in HPV+ normal and HPV+ CIN group
| Epithelial | ||||
| CD4 | 6 (30) | 10 (58.82) | 8 (66.67) | 0.011* |
| CD8 | 14 (70) | 7 (41.18) | 4 (33.33) | |
| Stromal | ||||
| CD4 | 16 (80) | 14 (82.35) | 9 (75) | 0.779 |
| CD8 | 4 (20) | 3 (17.65) | 3 (25) |
Notes: Values shown are number (%) not otherwise specified. number of infiltrating CD4+ lymphocytes higher than infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes or vice versa. *Represents P<0.05.
Abbreviations: CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; ILs, infiltrating lymphocytes; IHC, immunohistochemistry.
Figure 2Representative images of IHC staining for severe dysplasia (CIN III). CD4 and CD8 analysis on serial sections showing CD8TILs higher than CD4TILs (A, B).
Abbreviations: IHC, immunohistochemistry; TILs, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.