Literature DB >> 31615762

Protective behaviours of near work and time outdoors in myopia prevalence and progression in myopic children: a 2-year prospective population study.

Pin-Chen Huang1,2, Ya-Chuan Hsiao3,4, Ching-Yao Tsai3,4,5, Der-Chong Tsai4,5,6, Chi-Wen Chen7, Chih-Chien Hsu4,8, Shier-Chieg Huang1, Meng-Hui Lin9, Yiing-Mei Liou10,11.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the protective behaviours of longer near work distance, discontinuing near work and more time outdoors in recess from parent self-report in the myopia prevalence and progression among myopic children aged 9-11 years.
METHODS: Myopia Investigation study in Taipei is a longitudinal population-based study that enrolled elementary school students in Taipei. We provided vision and refraction examination every 6 months. Spherical equivalent (SE) of cycloplegic refraction ≤-0.50 Diopter (D) is defined as myopia. Total 10 743 (70.4%) students completed 2-year refraction data and questionnaire. The myopia prevalence and progression (difference of SE) in baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were compared by generalised estimating equations.
RESULTS: Children with persistent protective behaviour had significant lower prevalence of myopia. The protective impact was statistically significant from 6 to 24 months. In 2 years follow-up, risk ratio after adjusting the background variables and the other two behaviours in near work distance, near work time and outdoor time were 0.71, 0.89 and 0.77. In SE analysis, after adjusting the other two behaviours, near work distance >30 cm (-0.7 vs -1.04 D; p<0.001), discontinuing near work every 30 min (-0.77 vs -0.96 D, p=0.005) and more time outdoors in recess from parent self-report (-0.75 vs -0.98 D; p=0.012) revealed protective impacts on diminishing myopia progression from 6 to 24 months.
CONCLUSION: In myopic children aged around 10 years in Taipei, longer distance in near work, discontinuing near work every 30 min and more outdoor time from parent self-report are protective behaviours in myopia prevalence and progression in 6-24 months. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  child health (paediatrics); epidemiology; optics and refraction; public health; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31615762     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  12 in total

1.  Low-intensity red-light therapy in slowing myopic progression and the rebound effect after its cessation in Chinese children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hongyan Chen; Wei Wang; Ya Liao; Wen Zhou; Qin Li; Jingjing Wang; Jie Tang; Yifei Pei; Xiaojuan Wang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  A Latent Class Analysis of Student Eye Care Behavior: Evidence From a Sample of 6-17 Years Old in China.

Authors:  Mengying Li; Wenjing Wang; Boya Zhu; Xiaodong Tan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Photorefraction Screening Plus Atropine Treatment for Myopia is Cost-Effective: A Proof-of-Concept Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Chuen Yen Hong; Matt Boyd; Graham Wilson; Sheng Chiong Hong
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-13

4.  Associations of Children's Close Reading Distance and Time Spent Indoors with Myopia, Based on Parental Questionnaire.

Authors:  Olavi Pärssinen; Essi Lassila; Markku Kauppinen
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28

5.  Effect of Parental Myopia on Change in Refraction in Shanghai Preschoolers: A 1-Year Prospective Study.

Authors:  Yingyan Ma; Senlin Lin; Jianfeng Zhu; Rong Zhao; Bo Zhang; Yao Yin; Yueqin Shao; Xiangui He; Xun Xu; Haidong Zou
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 6.  Multiple Factors Causing Myopia and the Possible Treatments: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Ari Shinojima; Kazuno Negishi; Kazuo Tsubota; Toshihide Kurihara
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-10

7.  Time trend of axial length and associated factors in 4- and 5-year-old children in Shanghai from 2013 to 2019.

Authors:  Tao Li; Ting Wan; Xiaoqian Yao; Huihong Qi; Xuefeng Chen; Man She; Qianqian Hu; Xiaodong Zhou
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  The relationship between education levels, lifestyle, and religion regarding the prevalence of myopia in Israel.

Authors:  Sharon Armarnik; Maya Lavid; Sharon Blum; Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe; David B Granet; Michael Kinori
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Relationship between Myopia Progression and School Entrance Age: A 2.5-Year Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Linjie Liu; Dandan Jiang; Chunchun Li; Yaoyao Lin; Wenzhe Zhou; Haishao Xiao; Yanyan Chen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Association of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Genes With Myopia: A Longitudinal Study of Chinese Children.

Authors:  Haishao Xiao; Shudan Lin; Dandan Jiang; Yaoyao Lin; Linjie Liu; Qiqi Zhang; Juan He; Yanyan Chen
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.