Literature DB >> 31615618

A continuum of stomatal responses to water deficits among 17 wine grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera).

Alexander D Levin1, Larry E Williams2, Mark A Matthews3.   

Abstract

Vitis vinifera L. cultivars have been previously classified as isohydric, near-isohydric, anisohydric or isohydrodynamic, depending on the study. To test the hypothesis that V. vinifera cultivars' stomatal behaviour can be separated into distinct classes, 17 cultivars grown in a replicated field trial were subjected to three irrigation treatments to manipulate vine water status across multiple years. Predawn (ΨPD) and midday (Ψl) leaf water potential and midday stomatal conductance (gs) were measured regularly throughout several seasons. The relationship of gs to Ψl was best modelled as a sigmoidal function and maximum stomatal conductance (gmax), water status at the onset of stomatal closure (Ψl95), sensitivity of closure (gsensitivity) and water status at the end of closure (Ψl25) were compared. There were no significant differences in gmax among cultivars. Cultivar-specific responses of gs to Ψl were broadly distributed along a continuum based on the relationship between Ψl95 and gsensitivity. Season-long cultivar mean Ψl values were positively related to Ψl25. In general, cultivars responded similarly to one another at high and low water status, but their stomatal behaviour differed at moderate water deficits. The results show that V. vinifera cultivars possess both iso- and anisohydric stomatal behaviours that depend on the intensity of water deficits, and call into question previous classifications assuming a single behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31615618     DOI: 10.1071/FP19073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Plant Biol        ISSN: 1445-4416            Impact factor:   3.101


  5 in total

1.  Adapting Grapevine Productivity and Fitness to Water Deficit by Means of Naturalized Rootstocks.

Authors:  Emilio Villalobos-Soublett; Nicolás Verdugo-Vásquez; Irina Díaz; Andrés Zurita-Silva
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Drought stress modulates cuticular wax composition of the grape berry.

Authors:  Nicolas Dimopoulos; Ricco Tindjau; Darren C J Wong; Till Matzat; Tegan Haslam; Changzheng Song; Gregory A Gambetta; Ljerka Kunst; Simone D Castellarin
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 3.  The physiology of drought stress in grapevine: towards an integrative definition of drought tolerance.

Authors:  Gregory A Gambetta; Jose Carlos Herrera; Silvina Dayer; Quishuo Feng; Uri Hochberg; Simone D Castellarin
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 6.992

4.  Genome-wide identification and functional characterization of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) MAPKKK gene family in response to drought stress.

Authors:  Jing-Bo Zhang; Xin-Peng Wang; Ya-Chao Wang; Yi-Hao Chen; Jing-Wen Luo; Deng-Di Li; Xue-Bao Li
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 5.  Abscisic Acid Mediates Drought and Salt Stress Responses in Vitis vinifera-A Review.

Authors:  Daniel Marusig; Sergio Tombesi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.