S Okhovat1, T D Milner1, A Iyer1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, Scotland, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Comparing the feasibility of ovine and synthetic temporal bones for simulating endoscopic ear surgery against the 'gold standard' of human cadaveric tissue. METHODS: A total of 10 candidates (5 trainees and 5 experts) performed endoscopic tympanoplasty on 3 models: Pettigrew temporal bones, ovine temporal bones and cadaveric temporal bones. Candidates completed a questionnaire assessing the face validity, global content validity and task-specific content validity of each model. RESULTS: Regarding ovine temporal bone validity, the median values were 4 (interquartile range = 4-4) for face validity, 4 (interquartile range = 4-4) for global content validity and 4 (interquartile range = 4-4) for task-specific content validity. For the Pettigrew temporal bone, the median values were 3.5 (interquartile range = 2.25-4) for face validity, 3 (interquartile range = 2.75-3) for global content validity and 3 (interquartile range = 2.5-3) for task-specific content validity. The ovine temporal bone was considered significantly superior to the Pettigrew temporal bone for the majority of validity categories assessed. CONCLUSION: Tympanoplasty is feasible in both the ovine temporal bone and the Pettigrew temporal bone. However, the ovine model was a significantly more realistic simulation tool.
OBJECTIVE: Comparing the feasibility of ovine and synthetic temporal bones for simulating endoscopic ear surgery against the 'gold standard' of human cadaveric tissue. METHODS: A total of 10 candidates (5 trainees and 5 experts) performed endoscopic tympanoplasty on 3 models: Pettigrew temporal bones, ovine temporal bones and cadaveric temporal bones. Candidates completed a questionnaire assessing the face validity, global content validity and task-specific content validity of each model. RESULTS: Regarding ovine temporal bone validity, the median values were 4 (interquartile range = 4-4) for face validity, 4 (interquartile range = 4-4) for global content validity and 4 (interquartile range = 4-4) for task-specific content validity. For the Pettigrew temporal bone, the median values were 3.5 (interquartile range = 2.25-4) for face validity, 3 (interquartile range = 2.75-3) for global content validity and 3 (interquartile range = 2.5-3) for task-specific content validity. The ovine temporal bone was considered significantly superior to the Pettigrew temporal bone for the majority of validity categories assessed. CONCLUSION: Tympanoplasty is feasible in both the ovine temporal bone and the Pettigrew temporal bone. However, the ovine model was a significantly more realistic simulation tool.
Authors: Matteo Fermi; Francesco Chiari; Francesco Mattioli; Marco Bonali; Giulia Molinari; Matteo Alicandri-Ciufelli; Lukas Anschuetz; Ignacio Javier Fernandez; Livio Presutti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-19 Impact factor: 3.390