| Literature DB >> 31614981 |
Zhiyuan Zhou1, Massoud Sofi2, Elisa Lumantarna3, Rackel San Nicolas4, Gideon Hadi Kusuma5, Priyan Mendis6.
Abstract
To address sustainability issues by facilitating the use of high-volume fly ash (HVFA) concrete in industry, this paper investigates the early age hydration properties of HVFA binders in concrete and the correlation between hydration properties and compressive strengths of the cement pastes. A new method of calculating the chemically bound water of HVFA binders was used and validated. Fly ash (FA) types used in this study were sourced from Indonesia and Australia for comparison. The water to binder (w/b) ratio was 0.4 and FA replacement levels were 40%, 50% and 60% by weight. Isothermal calorimetry tests were conducted to study the heat of hydration which was further converted to the adiabatic temperature rise. Thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) was employed to explore the chemically bound water (WB) of the binders. The results showed that Australian FA pastes had higher heat of hydration, adiabatic temperature rise, WB and compressive strength compared to Indonesian FA pastes. The new method of calculating chemically bound water can be successfully applied to HVFA binders. Linear correlation could be found between the WB and compressive strength.Entities:
Keywords: adiabatic temperature rise; binder; chemically bound water (WB); heat of hydration; high volume fly ash
Year: 2019 PMID: 31614981 PMCID: PMC6829351 DOI: 10.3390/ma12203344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
The chemical composition of type I ordinary Portland cement (OPC), Australian fly ash (FA) and Indonesian FA used in this research.
| Type I OPC | Australian FA | Indonesian FA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Composition (%) | SO₃ | 2.7 | 0.3 | 0.21 |
| CaO | 63.7 | 6.2 | 9.24 | |
| SiO₂ | 19.9 | 56.2 | 45.67 | |
| Al₂O₃ | 4.6 | 23 | 21.85 | |
| Fe₂O₃ | 2.57 | 7.9 | 15.73 | |
| MgO | 1.39 | 1.5 | 3.51 | |
| K₂O | 0.69 | 0.95 | 1.34 | |
| Na₂O | 0.09 | 0.79 | 0.52 | |
| P₂O₅ | 0.04 | 1.2 | 0.28 | |
| Mn₂O₃ | 0.06 | <0.1 | 0.17 | |
| Cr₂O₃ | 0 | min | min | |
| SrO | 0.07 | min | min | |
| Na2O | 0.5 | 0.79 | 0.52 | |
| LoI | 3.9 | 0.9 | 11.31 | |
| Mineral Phase (%) | C₃S | 65.78 | ||
| C₃A | 7.82 | |||
| C₄AF | 7.88 |
Figure 1Particle size distribution for both Indonesian FA and Australian FA.
Mix design for experiment in this research (Note: FA/b represents the ratio of fly ash to total binder by weight).
| Mix | w/b | FA/b |
|---|---|---|
| Ref | 0.4 | 0 |
| Indonesian FA 40% | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Indonesian FA 50% | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Indonesian FA 60% | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Australian FA 40% | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Australian FA 50% | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Australian FA 60% | 0.4 | 0.6 |
Temperature boundaries for decomposition phases of cement pastes considered in thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) test [24].
| Decomposition Phase | Temperature Boundaries (°C) [ |
|---|---|
| Dehydration (Ldh) | 105–400 |
| Dehydroxylation (Ldx) | 400–600 |
| Decarbonation (Ldc) | 600–1000 |
Figure 2Normalised heat flow for Indonesian FA and OPC pastes.
Figure 3Normalised heat flow for Australian FA and OPC pastes.
Setting time and delay of setting estimated from isothermal calorimetry for blended cement compared with OPC.
| Setting Time (h) | Delay of Setting (h) | |
|---|---|---|
| Reference mix | 8.26 | 0 |
| Indonesian FA 40% | 8.84 | 0.58 |
| Indonesian FA 50% | 9.71 | 1.45 |
| Indonesian FA 60% | 11.26 | 3.00 |
| Australian FA 40% | 8.76 | 0.50 |
| Australian FA 50% | 9.00 | 0.75 |
| Australian FA 60% | 9.20 | 0.94 |
Figure 4Normalised cumulative heat released for all the cement paste samples.
Figure 5Adiabatic temperature rise for all the paste samples.
Calculated Ldh, Ldx, Ldc, Ldca and WB for all the mixes.
| Mix | Age (Day) | m_sample (mg) | Ldh (mg) | Ldx (mg) | Ldc (mg) | Ldca (mg) | WB (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ref | 1 | 55.83 | 4.18 | 1.32 | 2.41 | 2.13 | 59.08 |
| 3 | 47.87 | 12.59 | 0.10 | 2.29 | 2.02 | 81.80 | |
| 7 | 50.90 | 5.80 | 1.94 | 1.98 | 1.62 | 108.81 | |
| 28 | 38.87 | 4.28 | 1.34 | 2.46 | 1.63 | 114.72 | |
| Indonesian FA 40% | 1 | 56.63 | 2.48 | 1.29 | 2.56 | 2.62 | 32.99 |
| 3 | 56.51 | 3.50 | 0.56 | 3.38 | 3.29 | 39.17 | |
| 7 | 49.09 | 3.65 | 0.94 | 3.23 | 3.11 | 61.43 | |
| 28 | 46.62 | 3.61 | 0.65 | 2.48 | 2.50 | 58.00 | |
| Indonesian FA 50% | 1 | 56.98 | 2.15 | 1.26 | 2.64 | 2.59 | 20.34 |
| 3 | 45.26 | 2.26 | 0.91 | 2.25 | 2.15 | 31.23 | |
| 7 | 52.24 | 3.31 | 1.15 | 2.75 | 2.73 | 45.91 | |
| 28 | 50.78 | 4.23 | 1.03 | 2.58 | 2.46 | 64.83 | |
| Indonesian FA 60% | 1 | 61.22 | 1.49 | 1.59 | 1.96 | 2.08 | 3.29 |
| 3 | 55.13 | 2.54 | 1.41 | 2.50 | 2.57 | 24.70 | |
| 7 | 54.32 | 3.07 | 1.28 | 2.44 | 2.38 | 34.21 | |
| 28 | 47.28 | 3.16 | 1.13 | 1.88 | 1.79 | 45.24 | |
| Australian FA 40% | 1 | 44.45 | 1.91 | 0.43 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 36.50 |
| 3 | 47.04 | 2.64 | 0.69 | 1.19 | 1.52 | 51.74 | |
| 7 | 42.91 | 2.98 | 0.59 | 1.11 | 0.58 | 71.95 | |
| 28 | 40.98 | 3.50 | 0.70 | 2.00 | 1.85 | 79.64 | |
| Australian FA 50% | 1 | 48.40 | 2.27 | 0.49 | 2.12 | 48.40 | 39.64 |
| 3 | 48.99 | 2.41 | 0.64 | 1.71 | 48.99 | 46.02 | |
| 7 | 39.41 | 2.21 | 0.83 | 1.77 | 39.41 | 64.79 | |
| 28 | 34.48 | 3.18 | 0.53 | 0.39 | 34.48 | 79.28 | |
| Australian FA 60% | 1 | 51.96 | 1.80 | 0.31 | 1.73 | 1.73 | 19.81 |
| 3 | 41.74 | 2.08 | 0.40 | 2.05 | 1.94 | 39.86 | |
| 7 | 46.08 | 2.62 | 0.76 | 2.36 | 1.58 | 59.44 | |
| 28 | 42.69 | 3.50 | 0.72 | 1.63 | 1.43 | 68.40 |
Figure 6Comparison of WB between Indonesian FA and Australian FA pastes.
Figure 7Comparison of compressive strength between Indonesian FA and Australian FA pastes.
Figure 8Compressive strength vs. WB for OPC and Indonesian FA pastes.
Figure 9Compressive strength vs. water bound (WB) for OPC and Australian FA pastes.