| Literature DB >> 31614789 |
Jian Ma1,2, Guoqing Sun3,4, Ali Mujtaba Shah5,6, Xue Fan7, Shengli Li8, Xiong Yu9.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the rumen degradation characteristic of amaranth silage (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) including four kinds of growing stages (budding stage (BS), 50 d after planting (DAP); early flowering stage (ES), 58 DAP; peak flowering stage (PS), 70 DAP; heading stage (HS), 90 DAP). Four Holstein dairy cows with permanent ruminal cannulas were used as experimental animals. Nylon-bag method was used to assess the ruminal degradability of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF). The results showed that the concentration of DM in HS was significantly higher than other stages (p < 0.05), whereas the contents of CP, were lower than in other stages (p < 0.05). With the extension of the growing period, the DM effective degradability of amaranth silage decreased gradually, and the difference was significant (p < 0.05). The ruminal CP degradation of 72 h was more than 80%, and compared with ES and HS, the degradation rate of BS and PS was significantly increased (p < 0.05). Compared to BS, the effective degradability of CP was increased (p < 0.05) in ES and HS. For ruminal NDF degradability, the effective degradability of HS was minimum, and it had a noticeable difference with BS and ES (p < 0.05). Thus, the different quality of amaranth growth stage including chemical contents and rumen degradation should be taken into consideration when making amaranth silage. In the present study, the optimal growth stage of amaranth was from the peak flowering stage to heading stage for ensiling.Entities:
Keywords: amaranth silage; chemical composition; correlation; effective degradability; growth stage
Year: 2019 PMID: 31614789 PMCID: PMC6826743 DOI: 10.3390/ani9100793
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Chemical composition of amaranth silage. (%, DM basis).
| Items | Growth Stage | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS | ES | PS | HS | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| DM | 15.31 c | 17.19 b,c | 18.82 b | 22.20 a | 0.323 | <0.001 | 0.198 |
| CP | 13.21 a | 12.52 a | 12.41 a | 11.51 b | 0.113 | <0.001 | 0.028 |
| NDF | 47.88 b | 50.85 a,b | 53.39 a | 54.14 a | 1.585 | <0.001 | 0.361 |
| ADF | 29.79 b | 31.03 b | 33.84 a,b | 38.03 a | 1.077 | 0.013 | 0.453 |
| ADL | 2.53 c | 2.62 c | 3.39 b | 4.67 a | 0.023 | <0.001 | 0.560 |
BS = budding stage; ES = early flowering stage; PS = peak flowering stage; HS = heading stage. DM = dry matter; CP = crude protein; NDF = neutral detergent fiber; ADF = acid detergent fiber; ADL = lignin. In the same column, values with different letter mean significant difference (p < 0.05).
Rumen degradability and degradation parameters of DM of amaranth silage.
| Items | Growth Stage | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS | ES | PS | HS | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| Time (%) | |||||||
| 4 | 38.89 a | 39.26 a | 36.06 b | 34.97 b,c | 0.505 | 0.031 | 0.024 |
| 8 | 44.34 b | 45.76 a | 45.96 a | 46.15 a | 0.838 | 0.043 | 0.367 |
| 16 | 53.41 b | 54.04 a | 53.24 b | 51.73 c | 1.337 | 0.022 | 0.038 |
| 24 | 62.01 a | 61.44 b | 59.10 c | 57.05 d | 1.287 | <0.001 | 0.816 |
| 36 | 65.82 a | 65.36 a | 60.88 b | 60.82 b | 1.493 | 0.014 | 0.227 |
| 48 | 71.34 a | 66.73 b | 62.36 c | 62.56 c | 2.149 | 0.015 | 0.040 |
| 72 | 76.07 a | 69.78 b | 67.63 c | 66.23 d | 2.391 | <0.001 | 0.711 |
| Rumen Degradation Parameters | |||||||
| a (%) | 33.89 a | 31.07 b | 28.20 c | 28.23 c | 0.307 | 0.013 | 0.038 |
| b (%) | 46.23 a | 38.85 b | 37.32 b,c | 36.85 c | 0.301 | 0.007 | 0.207 |
| a + b (%) | 80.12 a | 69.92 b | 65.52 c | 65.08 c | 0.558 | <0.001 | 0.188 |
| c (%/h) | 0.03 c | 0.06 b | 0.07 a | 0.06 a,b | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| ED (%) | 57.48 a | 56.52 b | 54.04 c | 53.26 d | 1.073 | <0.001 | 0.804 |
BS = budding stage; ES = early flowering stage; PS = peak flowering stage; HS = heading stage. a: rapidly degradable fraction; b: slowly degradable fraction; a + b: total degradable fraction; c: degradation rate of slowly degradable fraction; ED: effective degradability. In the same column, values with different letter mean significant difference (p < 0.05).
Rumen degradability and degradation parameters of CP of amaranth silage.
| Items | Growth Stage | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS | ES | PS | HS | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| Time (%) | |||||||
| 4 | 45.87 b | 50.13 a | 46.84 b | 47.68 a,b | 1.185 | 0.042 | 0.031 |
| 8 | 50.07 c | 57.81 b | 57.07 b | 61.07 a | 0.530 | 0.056 | 0.008 |
| 16 | 66.53 a | 67.21 a | 63.34 b | 65.15 a,b | 1.415 | 0.070 | 0.013 |
| 24 | 69.78 | 71.29 | 70.17 | 71.30 | 1.818 | 0.340 | 0.189 |
| 36 | 73.36 b | 74.80 a,b | 73.57 b | 76.75 a | 2.076 | 0.036 | 0.310 |
| 48 | 82.13 a | 79.08 b,c | 80.77 a,b | 77.47 c | 1.474 | 0.022 | 0.213 |
| 72 | 86.02 a | 82.14 b | 84.97 a | 82.97 b | 1.227 | 0.034 | 0.040 |
| Rumen Degradation Parameters | |||||||
| a (%) | 37.62 b | 43.18 a | 42.46 a | 42.06 a | 0.453 | 0.039 | 0.042 |
| b (%) | 49.86 a | 38.87 c | 44.61 b | 39.90 c | 0.801 | 0.008 | 0.032 |
| a + b (%) | 87.48 a | 82.05 b | 87.07 a | 81.96 b | 0.776 | 0.017 | 0.024 |
| c (%/h) | 0.04 a,b | 0.06 a | 0.04 b | 0.06 a | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| ED (%) | 66.69 b | 68.01 a | 67.31 a,b | 67.95 a | 1.079 | 0.321 | 0.036 |
BS = budding stage; ES = early flowering stage; PS = peak flowering stage; HS = heading stage. a: rapidly degradable fraction; b: slowly degradable fraction; a + b: total degradable fraction; c: degradation rate of slowly degradable fraction; ED: effective degradability. In the same column, values with different letter mean significant difference (p < 0.05).
Rumen degradability and degradation parameters of NDF of amaranth silage.
| Items | Growth Stage | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS | ES | PS | HS | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| Time (%) | |||||||
| 4 | 11.67 | 13.94 | 12.60 | 11.44 | 1.471 | 0.620 | 0.248 |
| 8 | 15.40 b | 18.18 a,b | 21.13 a | 20.32 a | 0.724 | 0.044 | 0.029 |
| 16 | 20.02 b | 26.30 a | 24.97 a | 22.17 b | 0.271 | 0.032 | 0.016 |
| 24 | 31.54 c | 38.19 a | 37.46 a | 35.29 b | 1.339 | 0.022 | 0.008 |
| 36 | 37.03 | 40.88 | 38.68 | 37.29 | 2.851 | 0.673 | 0.260 |
| 48 | 51.12 a | 45.06 b | 49.41 a | 46.35 b | 1.428 | 0.040 | 0.027 |
| 72 | 59.16 a | 56.40 b | 58.23 a | 56.78 b | 1.200 | 0.021 | 0.033 |
| Rumen Degradation Parameters | |||||||
| a (%) | 5.41 | 5.87 | 7.29 | 6.67 | 2.010 | 0.844 | 0.230 |
| b (%) | 70.13 a | 45.71 b | 40.95 c | 42.26 b,c | 1.668 | <0.001 | 0.011 |
| a + b (%) | 75.54 a | 51.58 b | 48.24 b | 48.93 b | 2.413 | <0.001 | 0.018 |
| c (%/h) | 0.02 b | 0.04 a | 0.04 a | 0.04 a | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.372 |
| ED (%) | 31.53 a | 32.26 a | 30.99 a,b | 29.81 b | 1.225 | 0.194 | 0.016 |
BS = budding stage; ES = early flowering stage; PS = peak flowering stage; HS = heading stage. a: rapidly degradable fraction; b: slowly degradable fraction; a + b: total degradable fraction; c: degradation rate of slowly degradable fraction; ED: effective degradability. In the same column, values with different letter mean significant difference (p < 0.05).
Rumen degradability and degradation parameters of ADF of amaranth silage.
| Items | Growth Stage | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS | ES | PS | HS | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| Time (%) | |||||||
| 4 | 10.31 a | 7.37 b | 6.85 b | 10.60 a | 0.431 | 0.030 | 0.004 |
| 8 | 14.56 | 9.21 | 14.45 | 12.00 | 2.621 | 0.583 | 0.109 |
| 16 | 17.41 a | 14.32 b | 18.04 a | 14.82 b | 0.517 | 0.018 | 0.048 |
| 24 | 32.40 a | 26.28 c | 29.25 b | 29.48 b | 1.319 | 0.036 | 0.010 |
| 36 | 38.81 a | 30.83 b | 29.61 b | 31.41 b | 1.369 | 0.013 | 0.021 |
| 48 | 50.62 a | 33.68 b,c | 32.11 c | 35.71 b | 1.172 | 0.018 | 0.014 |
| 72 | 54.44 a | 41.55 c | 44.49 b | 42.10 c | 1.181 | 0.014 | 0.039 |
| Rumen Degradation Parameters | |||||||
| a (%) | 3.03 a,b | 1.35 b | 4.77 a | 5.00 a | 0.333 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| b (%) | 67.23 a | 47.72 b | 46.60 b | 45.88 b | 1.177 | <0.001 | 0.337 |
| a + b (%) | 70.26 a | 49.07 b | 51.37 b | 50.88 b | 1.583 | <0.001 | 0.016 |
| c (%/h) | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.007 | 0.761 | 0.418 |
| ED (%) | 30.84 a | 22.90 b | 24.65 b | 24.83 b | 1.119 | 0.226 | 0.024 |
BS = budding stage; ES = early flowering stage; PS = peak flowering stage; HS = heading stage. a: rapidly degradable fraction; b: slowly degradable fraction; a + b: total degradable fraction; c: degradation rate of slowly degradable fraction; ED: effective degradability. In the same column, values with different letter mean significant difference (p < 0.05).
Correlation of amaranth silage between effective degradability and ruminal degradability of DM, CP, NDF, and ADF at different time points.
| Items | Regression Equation | R2 | Items | Regression Equation | R2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM | CP | ||||||
| 4 h | y = 0.8074 x + 21.475 | 0.9242 | 0.037 | 4 h | - | - | 0.153 |
| 8 h | - | - | 0.166 | 8 h | - | - | 0.092 |
| 16 h | - | - | 0.244 | 16 h | - | - | 0.908 |
| 24 h | y = 0.8534 x + 4.209 | 0.9468 | 0.027 | 24 h | y = 0.7777 x + 12.559 | 0.9527 | 0.024 |
| 36 h | y = 0.7142 x + 10.173 | 0.9606 | 0.020 | 36 h | - | - | 0.216 |
| 48 h | y = 0.4485 x + 25.840 | 0.9039 | 0.049 | 48 h | - | - | 0.075 |
| 72 h | - | - | 0.093 | 72 h | y = −0.3388 x + 95.955 | 0.9483 | 0.026 |
| NDF | ADF | ||||||
| 4 h | - | - | 0.236 | 4 h | - | - | 0.395 |
| 8 h | - | - | 0.447 | 8 h | - | - | 0.308 |
| 16 h | - | - | 0.618 | 16 h | - | - | 0.440 |
| 24 h | - | - | 0.843 | 24 h | - | - | 0.067 |
| 36 h | - | - | 0.327 | 36 h | - | - | 0.053 |
| 48 h | - | - | 0.989 | 48 h | y = 0.3907 x + 10.945 | 0.9220 | 0.040 |
| 72 h | - | - | 0.935 | 72 h | y = 0.5644 x + 0.042 | 0.9539 | 0.023 |
x represents rumen degradability at different time point; y represents effective degradability. “-” represents no significant correlation.