| Literature DB >> 31614624 |
Asif Rashid1, Azat Bilal2, Chong Liu3, M P Jahan4, Didier Talamona5, Asma Perveen6.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility of machining micro-holes on the non-conductive Aluminum Nitride (AlN) ceramics using micro-electro-discharge machining (EDM) process by exploiting various coating techniques. Although ceramics possess excellent mechanical properties under compressive load condition and superior thermal properties, machining of microscale features on ceramics remains challenging due to the extreme brittleness associated with ceramics. Due to the involvement of higher cutting force and tool wear issue, conventional machining process appears to be unsuitable for machining ceramics. On the other hand, non-contact and negligible process force associated with EDM process makes it one of the competitive processes for machining of ceramics. A series of experiments were carried out on AlN ceramics using "Assistive Electrode" micro-EDM process with a goal of machining blind micro-holes into the ceramics with the aid of on-machine fabricated copper tungsten tools. It was found that multi-layer coatings of silver and copper with copper tungsten electrode resulted in successful machining with high-aspect-ratio holes during powder mixed micro-EDM of AlN ceramics, while micro-holes with less than one aspect ratio are machined without powder addition to the dielectric. It was also observed that comparatively lower level of discharge energies, i.e., lower value of voltages and capacitances were favorable for successful machining of micro-holes in ceramics, even though it results in significantly higher machining time. Despite of relatively low discharge energy usage in micro-EDM, machined surfaces appear to be very rough. The machined surfaces indicate that melting and evaporation, as well as thermal spalling, are the dominating material removal mechanisms. The machined surfaces contained many thermal cracks and porosity on the surface. The elemental composition analysis confirms the presence of aluminum and nitrogen elements on the machined surface. Finally, by careful selection of machining conditions and assistive electrode, successful machining of micro-holes is possible on the non-conductive ceramic surfaces using the micro-EDM process.Entities:
Keywords: Micro-EDM; assistive electrode; ceramics; copper tape; micro-hole; silver coating
Year: 2019 PMID: 31614624 PMCID: PMC6829549 DOI: 10.3390/ma12203316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Classification of ceramic materials based on conductivity [18].
Figure 2Basic principle of assisting electrode method: (a) Discharge for assisting electrode, (b) transition from assisting electrode to the insulating material, (c) discharge for insulating material [23].
Experimental conditions, parameters, and materials used in this study.
| Parameters | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceramic | AIN | AIN | AIN |
| Coating | Baked double layer silver coating with silver nanopowder in between (Both layers baked for 1 h at 900 °C) | Triple layered copper tape. Coating Thickness of 150 µm | Silver nanoparticles sandwiched between two layers of silver with copper on top, baked at 900 °C for 60 min |
| Tool | Copper–Tungsten | Copper–Tungsten | Copper–Tungsten |
| Tool diameter | 600 µm | 600 µm | 308 µm |
| Tool rotation | No rotation | No rotation | No rotation |
| Dielectric: | Hydrocarbon oil | Hydrocarbon oil | Hydrocarbon oil with Silver nanoparticle (100 mg/L) |
| Voltage | 80 V | 100 V | 80 V |
| Capacitance: | 10 nF (4) | 10 nF (4) | 100 nF |
| Machining time | 600 min | 120 min | 150 min |
| Depth of hole | 700 µm from coating surface | 700 µm from the tape surface | 1693 µm from coating surface |
| Flushing condition | No flushing | No flushing | No flushing |
List of machining attempts.
| No | Coating | Machining Parameters | Coolant | Spindle Spinning | Tool Material | Machining Condition | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacitance | Voltage (V) | Flushing | |||||
| 1 | Baked double layer silver coating with silver nanopowder in between (Both layers baked for 1 h at 900 °C) | 10 nF | 80 | No | No spinning | Copper-Tungsten | Successful machining |
| 2 | Copper Tape (triple layer) | 10 nF | 100 | No | No spinning | Copper-Tungsten | Successful machining |
| 3 | Copper conductive paint (single layer) | 400 nF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 4 | Copper conductive paint (single layer) | 100 nF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 5 | Copper conductive paint (single layer) | 10 nF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 6 | Copper conductive paint (single layer) | 1000 pF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 7 | Copper conductive paint (single layer) | 100 pF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 8 | Copper conductive paint (single layer) | 10 pF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 9 | Copper Tape (single layer) | 400 nF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 10 | Copper Tape (single layer) | 100 nF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 11 | Copper Tape (single layer) | 10 nF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 12 | Copper Tape (single layer) | 1000 pF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 13 | Copper Tape (single layer) | 100 pF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 14 | Copper Tape (single layer) | 10 pF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 15 | Copper Tape (single layer) | 400 nF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 16 | Carbon conductive paint (single layer) | 10 nF | 80 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Carbon | No machining |
| 17 | Copper Tape (single layer) | 100 nF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Carbon | No machining |
| 18 | Silver conductive paint (single layer) | 10 nF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Carbon | No machining |
| 19 | Copper conductive paint (single layer) | 10 nF | 130 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Carbon | No machining |
| 20 | Baked double layer silver coating with silver nanopowder in between (Both layers baked for 1 h at 900 °C) | 10 nF | 80 | Yes | 1200 RPM | Copper–Tungsten | No machining |
| 21 | Baked double layer silver coating with silver nanopowder in between (Both layers baked for 1 h at 900°C) | 400 nF | 80 | No | No spinning | Copper–Tungsten | Some machining |
| 22 | Baked double layer silver coating with silver nanopowder in between (Both layers baked for 1 h at 900 °C) – single layer copper tape on top | 10 nF | 80 | No | No spinning | Copper–Tungsten | No machining |
| 23 | Baked double layer silver coating with silver nanopowder in between (Both layers baked for 1 h at 900 °C) | 10 nF | 80 | No | No spinning | Copper–Tungsten | Machining happened at the bottom of the hole |
| 24 | Copper Tape (single layer 50 µm) | 10 nF | 80 | No | 200 RPM | Copper–Tungsten | No machining |
| 25 | Copper Tape (triple layer, 150 µm) | 10 nF | 100 | No | 100 RPM | Copper–Tungsten | Some machining |
| 26 | Copper Tape (triple layer, 150 µm) | 10 nF | 130 | No | No spinning | Copper–Tungsten | Electrode just repeat going up and down |
| 27 | Double layered silver coating with silver nanoparticles in between, baked at 900 °C for 60 min | 10nf | 80 | Yes | 1200RPM | Tungsten | No machining |
| 28 | Double layered silver coating with silver nanoparticles in between, baked at 900 °C for 60 min | 400nf | 80 | No | No | Tungsten | No machining |
Figure 3Optical images of few cases of unsuccessful machining. (a) Case 25, (b) Case 26, (c) Case 24, (d) Case 21, (e) Case 23, (f) Case 13, (g) Case 8, (h) Case 18, (i) Case 27 (no machining beyond conductive layer), (j) Case 28.
Figure 4Steps of the microelectrode fabrication using block micro-EDG process (one cycle of reduction of diameter is shown in four steps).
Figure 5(a) SEM image of a micro-hole machined on coated AlN ceramic surface; (b) SEM image showing the layers of silver coatings on AIN ceramic surface and the machined surface.
Figure 6SEM images of the machines surface at the bottom of the blind micro-hole. (a) melted globules on the surface; (b) thermal cracks and porosity on the surface.
Figure 7EDS Spectrum analysis on the machined surface (at the bottom of the micro-hole) with elemental composition analysis.
Figure 8EDS Spectrum analysis on the coating layer (at the top and side of the micro-hole) with elemental composition analysis.
Figure 9SEM image of the micro-hole on copper tape coated ceramic surface.
Figure 10(a,b) SEM images of the machined surface at the bottom of micro-hole.
Figure 11EDS Spectrum analysis of the machined surface (at the bottom of the micro-hole) with elemental composition.
Figure 12EDS Spectrum analysis of conductive copper tape layers at the area near the top of the micro-hole with elemental composition.
Figure 13(a) SEM image of a micro-hole machined on coated AlN ceramic, (b) side wall of the micro-hole surface for powder mixed EDM.
Figure 14EDS analysis has been taken from (a) un-machined coating surface and (b) edge of the micro-hole, obtained in AlN ceramic using combined assistive electrode and powder mixed EDM methods (The rectangular box is the area from where EDS spectrum has been taken).
Figure 15EDS spectrums with elemental composition taken from different spots of the micro-hole machined on AlN ceramic using assisted electrode method with powder mixed EDM; (a) un-machined coating surface and (b) edge of the micro-hole.