| Literature DB >> 31614521 |
Yongfan Gong1, Ben Yu2, Yonghao Fang3, Dingyi Yang4, Shu-An Wu5, Yurong Yan6.
Abstract
Fly ash belite cement is a kind of low-carbon cement prepared by a two-step process involving hydrothermal synthesis and low-temperature calcination. Pozzolanic reaction pastes, as the precursors of fly ash belite cement prepared by hydrothermal synthesis, are affected mainly by reaction temperature, time, ratios of the mass of fly ash/lime (FA/CA), and the dosage of Na2O. The absorbance rate of CaO with reaction time was tested for all samples, and the reaction kinetic model and parameters of the granule-hydrothermal synthesis method were discussed. A kinetic model for the hydrothermal synthesis in the presence of Na2O was proposed based on the Kondo's modified Jander equation and Arrhenius equation. The activation energy (Ea) of the process was determined to be 67.76 kJ/mol. In addition, with an increasing dosage of Na2O, the pre-exponential factor A of the Arrhenius equation increased. However, the hydrothermal reaction degree was accurately predicted using the kinetic model characterized by the absorption rate of CaO. The results indicated that Na2O, as an alkali activator, facilitated the diffusion of Ca2+ firstly, then partly dissolved the amorphous phase in the mixtures and, finally, accelerated the formation of poorly crystallized hydrates.Entities:
Keywords: NaOH; belite cement; fly ash; hydrothermal reaction; kinetic model; low activity
Year: 2019 PMID: 31614521 PMCID: PMC6829375 DOI: 10.3390/ma12203303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition of fly ash (wt. %).
| Chemical Composition | Fly Ash |
|---|---|
| SiO2 | 49.21 |
| Al2O3 | 29.46 |
| Fe2O3 | 4.36 |
| CaO | 2.26 |
| MgO | 0.80 |
| TiO2 | 1.21 |
| Na2O | 0.39 |
| K2O | 0.28 |
| SO3 | 0.18 |
| Loss on ignition | 10.08 |
CaO absorbed rate of precursors in the hydration reaction at 97 °C.
| No. | FA/CA/Na2O * | Absorption Rate of CaO (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h | 4 h | 6 h | 8 h | 12 h | 16 h | 20 h | 24 h | 32 h | 40 h | ||
| F1 | 80/20/0 | 26.1 | 37.3 | 49.7 | 58.5 | 72.3 | 76.8 | 82.1 | 86.7 | 89.1 | 91.7 |
| F2 | 75/25/0 | 19.7 | 32.1 | 44.5 | 56.4 | 64.9 | 69.9 | 74.3 | 80.5 | 84.1 | 87.8 |
| F3 | 70/30/0 | 20.6 | 27.8 | 41.9 | 50.3 | 60.5 | 67.6 | 72.5 | 76.1 | 80.2 | 83.7 |
| F4 | 65/35/0 | 18.7 | 28.3 | 39.6 | 47.2 | 56.1 | 65.6 | 72.2 | 74.8 | 78.7 | 81.5 |
| F2N5 | 75/25/0.5 | 23.1 | 33.1 | 48.8 | 53.4 | 66.6 | 75.7 | 80.2 | 83.4 | 86.2 | 88.9 |
| F2N10 | 75/25/1.0 | 27.5 | 39.2 | 53.1 | 59.6 | 68.1 | 78.6 | 83.9 | 86.8 | 89.7 | 91.8 |
| F2N15 | 75/25/1.5 | 31.2 | 50.1 | 56.4 | 66.2 | 78.4 | 83.8 | 86.1 | 89.5 | 94.3 | 96.2 |
| F3N5 | 70/30/0.5 | 23.5 | 29.2 | 43.7 | 51.7 | 62.8 | 67.3 | 74.7 | 78.4 | 81.8 | 85.6 |
| F3N10 | 70/30/1.0 | 31.6 | 43.3 | 52.2 | 61.8 | 70.5 | 76.3 | 82.6 | 85.1 | 88.7 | 90.9 |
| F3N15 | 70/30/1.5 | 33.5 | 47.2 | 55.6 | 64.1 | 75.6 | 80.1 | 85.8 | 88.6 | 92.2 | 94.8 |
| F4N5 | 65/35/0.5 | 20.8 | 28.9 | 40.3 | 50.2 | 60.6 | 65.6 | 69.7 | 75.6 | 79.1 | 82.3 |
| F4N10 | 65/35/1.0 | 25.4 | 38.7 | 50.1 | 61.2 | 68.3 | 74.3 | 77.4 | 81.3 | 84.2 | 87.7 |
| F4N15 | 65/35/1.5 | 29.7 | 41.4 | 55.6 | 64.7 | 74.3 | 79.8 | 82.4 | 84.8 | 89.2 | 91.4 |
| F3 a | 70/30/0 | 16.6 | 26.8 | 33.9 | 40.3 | 45.7 | 49.6 | 52.5 | 56.3 | 60.3 | 62.7 |
| F3 b | 70/30/0 | N/A | 6.4 | N/A | 10.1 | 13.6 | 16.2 | 18.7 | 20.1 | N/A | N/A |
a The reaction temperature was 57 °C; b the reaction temperature was 77 °C; * Na2O was added as equivalent NaOH and taken as the percentage of the total mass of CaO and fly ash.
Kinetic parameters of the reaction.
| No. | Mixed Control | α = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − lnk)/N)3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/N | (ln k)/N | k × 102 (h−1) | N | Standard Deviation (%) | ||
| F1 | 0.61 | −2.71 | 1.29 | 1.63 | 2.68 | α1 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 4.350)/1.63)3 |
| F2 | 0.65 | −2.95 | 1.07 | 1.54 | 3.59 | α2 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 4.537)/1.54)3 |
| F3 | 0.63 | −2.99 | 0.88 | 1.58 | 3.29 | α3 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 4.733)/1.58)3 |
| F4 | 0.64 | −3.07 | 0.85 | 1.55 | 3.04 | α4 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 4.676)/1.55)3 |
| F2N5 | 0.63 | −2.84 | 1.13 | 1.58 | 3.30 | α5 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 4.483)/1.58)3 |
| F2N10 | 0.59 | −2.63 | 1.18 | 1.69 | 2.43 | α6 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 4.439)/1.69)3 |
| F2N15 | 0.57 | −2.43 | 1.43 | 1.75 | 2.14 | α7 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 4.247)/1.75)3 |
| F3N5 | 0.61 | −2.88 | 0.88 | 1.64 | 2.97 | α8 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 4.733)/1.64)3 |
| F3N10 | 0.53 | −2.46 | 0.96 | 1.89 | 1.79 | α9 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 4.646)/1.89)3 |
| F3N15 | 0.54 | −2.40 | 1.19 | 1.85 | 1.41 | α10 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 4.431)/1.85)3 |
| F4N5 | 0.61 | −2.94 | 0.83 | 1.63 | 3.08 | α11 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 4.791)/1.63)3 |
| F4N10 | 0.56 | −2.62 | 0.90 | 1.80 | 3.39 | α12 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 4.710)/1.80)3 |
| F4N15 | 0.54 | −2.48 | 1.02 | 1.85 | 3.43 | α13 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 4.585)/1.85)3 |
| F3 a | 0.50 | −3.02 | 0.249 | 0.50 | 2.59 | α14 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 5.995)/1.98)3 |
| F3 b | 0.62 | −4.59 | 0.061 | 0.62 | 11.88 | α15 = 1 − (1 − e(lnt − 7.402)/1.61)3 |
Figure 1Experimental and simulated absorption rates of CaO under different conditions: (a) None addition; (b) the dosage of Na2O is 0.5%; (c) the dosage of Na2O is 1.0%; (d) the dosage of Na2O is 1.5%.
Figure 2Linear relationship curve between ln k and 1/T.
Figure 3Linear relationship curve between A and FA/CA.
Value of the kinetic constants and the standard deviation for the model.
| No. | k × 102 (h−1) | Standard Deviation (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Predictive Value | Experimental Value | ||
| F1 | 1.28 | 1.22 | 3.00 |
| F2 | 1.06 | 1.07 | 0.50 |
| F3 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 2.00 |
| F4 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 1.50 |
| F3 a | 0.261 | 0.249 | 0.60 |
| F3 b | 0.064 | 0.061 | 0.15 |
Value of a with different Na2O addition.
| No. | k (10−2)/h−1 | a (106) | Average of a (106) |
|---|---|---|---|
| F2N5 | 1.13 | 8.78 | 8.11 |
| F3N5 | 0.88 | 7.34 | |
| F4N5 | 0.83 | 8.21 | |
| F2N10 | 1.18 | 9.39 | 9.21 |
| F3N10 | 0.96 | 8.60 | |
| F4N10 | 0.90 | 9.64 | |
| F2N10 | 1.43 | 12.57 | 12.26 |
| F3N10 | 1.19 | 12.23 | |
| F4N10 | 1.02 | 11.98 |
Figure 4Relationship curve between values of a and dosages of Na2O.
Figure 5Verification of the kinetic model.