Literature DB >> 31614215

A pragmatic, adaptive clinical trial design for a rare disease: The FOcal Cerebral Arteriopathy Steroid (FOCAS) trial.

Yeonhee Park1, Heather J Fullerton2, Jordan J Elm3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pediatric stroke investigators identified as their top research priority a clinical trial of corticosteroids for focal cerebral arteriopathy (FCA). However, FCA is both rare and an acute condition making it infeasible to enroll the large sample sizes needed for standard, confirmatory clinical trials. We present a pragmatic approach to clinical trial design that may inform the approach to other rare disorders.
METHODS: We surveyed pediatric stroke experts to determine the level of evidence that would impact their clinical management of FCA. Incorporating survey results, a randomized, group sequential Bayesian adaptive design was proposed based on a quantitative radiologic outcome measure (change from baseline in change in the FCA Severity Score). Using accumulating information, the design determines whether intervention is better than control with high probability.
RESULTS: Among 21 (100%) respondents, the probability of corticosteroid efficacy that would lead the experts to treat was 30% (median). The probability of efficacy that would make them unwilling to randomize (because they would feel all children should receive corticosteroids) was 70%. Simulation studies with the proposed design showed that a total of 42 subjects controls the type I error rate at the desired level 0.20 and yields a smaller average sample size and trial duration compared to a conventional design.
CONCLUSIONS: Designs in rare diseases require special considerations; this is especially true for this childhood disease, which is both uncommon and acute. This design has incorporated expert consensus to establish the criteria for success, formal monitoring rules for safety, and early stopping rules.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian adaptive trial design; Pediatric stroke; Rare disease; Sequential monitoring rule

Year:  2019        PMID: 31614215      PMCID: PMC6857809          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  17 in total

1.  Adaptive group sequential designs for clinical trials: combining the advantages of adaptive and of classical group sequential approaches.

Authors:  H H Müller; H Schäfer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Adaptive sample size calculations in group sequential trials.

Authors:  W Lehmacher; G Wassmer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) study. A novel design for intervention trials. Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-Point.

Authors:  L Hansson; T Hedner; B Dahlöf
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Bayesian dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials using toxicity and efficacy odds ratios.

Authors:  Guosheng Yin; Yisheng Li; Yuan Ji
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Focal Cerebral Arteriopathy: Do Steroids Improve Outcome?

Authors:  Maja Steinlin; Sandra Bigi; Belinda Stojanovski; Jay Gajera; Maria Regényi; Marwan El-Koussy; Mark T Mackay
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

7.  Approaches to sample size calculation for clinical trials in rare diseases.

Authors:  Frank Miller; Sarah Zohar; Nigel Stallard; Jason Madan; Martin Posch; Siew Wan Hee; Michael Pearce; Mårten Vågerö; Simon Day
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 1.894

8.  Focal Cerebral Arteriopathy of Childhood: Novel Severity Score and Natural History.

Authors:  Heather J Fullerton; Nicholas Stence; Nancy K Hills; Bin Jiang; Catherine Amlie-Lefond; Timothy J Bernard; Neil R Friedman; Rebecca Ichord; Mark T Mackay; Mubeen F Rafay; Stéphane Chabrier; Maja Steinlin; Mitchell S V Elkind; Gabrielle A deVeber; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Imaging data reveal a higher pediatric stroke incidence than prior US estimates.

Authors:  Nidhi Agrawal; S Claiborne Johnston; Yvonne W Wu; Stephen Sidney; Heather J Fullerton
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  Post-stroke inflammation-target or tool for therapy?

Authors:  Kate Lykke Lambertsen; Bente Finsen; Bettina Hjelm Clausen
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 17.088

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Childhood stroke.

Authors:  Peter B Sporns; Heather J Fullerton; Sarah Lee; Helen Kim; Warren D Lo; Mark T Mackay; Moritz Wildgruber
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 2.  Application of Bayesian methods to accelerate rare disease drug development: scopes and hurdles.

Authors:  Kelley M Kidwell; Satrajit Roychoudhury; Barbara Wendelberger; John Scott; Tara Moroz; Shaoming Yin; Madhurima Majumder; John Zhong; Raymond A Huml; Veronica Miller
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.303

3.  Personalized Risk-Based Screening Design for Comparative Two-Arm Group Sequential Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Yeonhee Park
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.