Literature DB >> 31613140

Accuracy of FreeStyle Libre in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: The Effect of Sensor Age.

Michael Tsoukas1, Joanna Rutkowski2, Anas El-Fathi2, Jean-François Yale1,3, Sarah Bernier-Twardy2, Anne Bossy2, Evelyne Pytka2, Laurent Legault4, Ahmad Haidar2,3.   

Abstract

Background: FreeStyle Libre is a factory-calibrated continuous 14-day glucose sensor. Little is known about the accuracy of FreeStyle Libre as a function of sensor age.
Methods: We assessed the accuracy of FreeStyle Libre in 14 adults with type 1 diabetes. Each study participant attended our research facility for two or three 24-h visits, during which they wore a FreeStyle Libre aged 0-1 day, 5-7 days, or 13-14 days. Plasma glucose levels were measured every 10-30 min using YSI2300 STAT Plus Analyser. Participants also wore Dexcom G5® glucose sensor aged 1-2 days. We assessed sensors' accuracy using mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between FreeStyle Libre, the Dexcom G5 sensor, and plasma glucose.
Results: We had 1930 pairs of FreeStyle Libre sensor-plasma glucose measurements, collected from 36 FreeStyle Libre sensors, 18 of which were sensors aged 0-1 day, 9 were sensors aged 5-7 days, and 9 were sensors aged 13-14 days. The mean and median MARD for FreeStyle Libre sensors aged 0-1 days were 14.5% and 11.2%, respectively, and for sensors aged 13-14 days were 14.7% and 11.2%, respectively, but for sensors aged 5-7 days were 7.8% and 6.6%, respectively (P = 0.03 vs. sensors aged 0-1 days, and P = 0.06 vs. sensors aged 13-14 days). The percentage of points falling in the potentially dangerous zones C, D, or E in Clarke's error grid analysis were 1.9% for FreeStyle Libre sensors aged 0-1 day, 0.2% for sensors aged 5-7 days, and 0.4% for sensors aged 13-14 days. The overall accuracy of FreeStyle Libre and Dexcom G5 sensor was the same (mean MARD 12.8% and 12.5%, respectively; P = 0.57). Conclusions: FreeStyle Libre's accuracy is adequate during its entire lifetime but is least accurate during its first and last days. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02814123.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Dexcom; FreeStyle Libre; Glucose Levels; Glucose sensor; MARD; Type 1 Diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31613140     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  5 in total

1.  [Smart skin-A new technology in the area of digital dermatology].

Authors:  Charlotte Kiani; Charlotte Steiner; Alexander Zink
Journal:  Dermatologie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-09-30

2.  The association between hypoglycemia and glycemic variability in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Takahisa Handa; Akinobu Nakamura; Aika Miya; Hiroshi Nomoto; Hiraku Kameda; Kyu Yong Cho; So Nagai; Narihito Yoshioka; Hideaki Miyoshi; Tatsuya Atsumi
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.320

3.  Use of a Continuous Glucose Monitor to Determine the Glycaemic Index of Rice-Based Mixed Meals, Their Effect on a 24 h Glucose Profile and Its Influence on Overweight and Obese Young Adults' Meal Preferences.

Authors:  Khadidja Chekima; Benjamin Tziak Ze Wong; Mohd Ismail Noor; Yasmin Beng Houi Ooi; See Wan Yan; Brahim Chekima
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-03-28

4.  Discrepancies in glycemic metrics derived from different continuous glucose monitoring systems in adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Yongwen Zhou; Xiaodong Mai; Hongrong Deng; Daizhi Yang; Mao Zheng; Bin Huang; Linlin Xu; Jianping Weng; Wen Xu; Jinhua Yan
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Commercial and Scientific Solutions for Blood Glucose Monitoring-A Review.

Authors:  Yirui Xue; Angelika S Thalmayer; Samuel Zeising; Georg Fischer; Maximilian Lübke
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.