Literature DB >> 31612264

Operative treatment of torsional humeral shaft fractures in throwers leads to an earlier return to sport: a survey of expert shoulder and elbow surgeons.

Burak Altintas1,2, Nicole L Anderson1, Robert Boykin3, Peter J Millett4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the management of torsional humeral shaft fractures in a group of expert shoulder and elbow surgeons and analyse the rate of return to sport of these throwing athletes.
METHODS: A survey was sent to all physician members of two prominent sports medicine professional associations: the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and the Herodicus Society. Due to the rare nature of this injury, a historical survey of management and return to play was performed to allow analysis of trends in treatment and return to play after both non-operative and operative management.
RESULTS: The survey was emailed to 858 physician members. Out of the 95 respondents, 35 surgeons indicated they had treated ≥ 1 torsional humeral shaft fractures in throwing athletes (average 1.7 per surgeon). A total of 72 fractures were recorded with an average age of 20.4 years and the majority being male (68/72). Eighty-one percent (58/72) of the fractures were classified as simple spiral. Sixty-one percent (44/72) of the fractures were treated non-operatively, while 35% (25/72) of the fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Patient age, return to sport rate and level, type of fracture, and fracture healing time did not significantly differ based on treatment type. Average time to return to sport was significantly shorter for patients who underwent ORIF compared to non-operative treatment (p = 0.001). Overall, 48 (92.3%) of the 52 athletes returned to sport, with 84% (36/43) returning to the same level of play.
CONCLUSION: Torsional humeral shaft fractures in throwers are most commonly seen in young men and can be treated both operatively and non-operatively with overall similar results for healing time, rate of non-union, and return to sport. The only significant difference in the groups was an earlier return to sports in those fixed surgically, however, operative intervention also yielded a higher complication rate. Regardless of the treatment method, the overall rate of return to play was moderate. These finding are clinically relevant and can assist physicians with decision making for treatment and can help when advising throwers of appropriate expectations for recovery after this injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fracture; Humeral shaft; Return to sports; Thrower

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31612264     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05733-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  15 in total

Review 1.  Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating humeral shaft fractures in adults.

Authors:  Maurits W Gosler; Mark Testroote; J W Morrenhof; Heinrich M J Janzing
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18

Review 2.  Humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Gary F Updegrove; Wassim Mourad; Joseph A Abboud
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Humeral shaft fractures: results of operative and non-operative treatment.

Authors:  Edward Westrick; Benjamin Hamilton; Paul Toogood; Bradford Henley; Reza Firoozabadi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Thrower's fracture of the humerus with radial nerve palsy: an unfamiliar softball injury.

Authors:  P Curtin; C Taylor; J Rice
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Report of eight cases of humeral fracture following the throwing of hand grenades.

Authors:  H Kaplan; A Kiral; M Kuskucu; M O Arpacioglu; A Sarioglu; O Rodop
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Fabio Teruo Matsunaga; Marcel Jun Sugawara Tamaoki; Marcelo Hide Matsumoto; Nicola Archetti Netto; Flavio Faloppa; Joao Carlos Belloti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.

Authors:  Kiran C Mahabier; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Boyd C Van Der Schaaf; Gert R Roukema; Bas J Punt; Michael H J Verhofstad; Dennis Den Hartog
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee.

Authors:  J L Marsh; Theddy F Slongo; Julie Agel; J Scott Broderick; William Creevey; Thomas A DeCoster; Laura Prokuski; Michael S Sirkin; Bruce Ziran; Brad Henley; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Spontaneous fractures of the humerus during pitching. A series of 12 cases.

Authors:  T Branch; C Partin; P Chamberland; E Emeterio; M Sabetelle
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Surgical interventions to treat humerus shaft fractures: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jia-Guo Zhao; Jia Wang; Xiao-Hui Meng; Xian-Tie Zeng; Shi-Lian Kan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Return to work and sport after a humeral shaft fracture.

Authors:  William M Oliver; Samuel G Molyneux; Timothy O White; Nick D Clement; Andrew D Duckworth
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.