The Course of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Patients With Acromegaly During Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is common in active acromegaly and negatively influences quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. This prospective study with 3 predetermined timepoints and a standardized treatment protocol investigates changes in sleep parameters during the first 2.5 years of acromegaly treatment.
METHODS: Before initiation of acromegaly treatment (medical pretreatment followed by surgery), polysomnography (PSG) was performed in 27 consecutive patients with treatment-naive acromegaly. PSG was repeated after 1 year (N = 24) and 2.5 years (N = 23), and anthropometric and biochemical parameters were obtained.
RESULTS: At baseline, 74.1% of the patients was diagnosed with OSAS. The respiratory disturbance index (RDI; P = 0.001), oxygen desaturation index (ODI; P = 0.001), lowest oxygen saturation (LSaO2; P = 0.007) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS; P < 0.001) improved significantly during treatment, with the greatest improvement in the first year. After 2.5 years of treatment, all patients had controlled acromegaly. Of the 16 patients with repeated PSG and OSAS at baseline, 11 (68.8%) were cured of OSAS. Changes in RDI, ODI, LSaO2, and ESS correlated with insulin-like growth factor 1 levels.
CONCLUSION: OSAS has a high prevalence in active acromegaly. There is a substantial decrease in prevalence and severity of OSAS following acromegaly treatment, with the largest improvement during the first year. Most patients recover from OSAS following surgical or biochemical control of the acromegaly. Therefore, a PSG is advised after diagnosis of acromegaly. When OSAS is present, it should be treated and PSG should be repeated during acromegaly treatment. © Endocrine Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Acromegaly is a rare disease that is characterized by uncontrolled growth hormone (GH) secretion, most commonly caused by a pituitary adenoma, which leads to excessive production of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) (1, 2). GH and IGF-1 hypersecretion lead to craniofacial abnormalities and tissue growth in the upper respiratory tract. These changes result in an increased incidence of—predominantly obstructive—sleep apnea syndrome ([O]SAS) (2–4), which is characterized by episodes of reduction or cessation of airflow during sleep. This leads to signs of disturbed sleep, such as snoring, restlessness, or resuscitative snorts.

In the general population, disturbed sleep is associated with poor neurocognitive performance (5) and an array of daytime symptoms, such as sleepiness, fatigue, and poor concentration (6, 7). Consequently, SAS severely influences the quality of life (8, 9). OSAS is associated with endothelial dysfunction, systemic inflammation, and dysglycemia, which are factors that are associated with the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (10). In addition, severe untreated OSAS is associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (11).

In acromegaly, the reported prevalence of SAS ranges from 44% to 87.5% among patients with active disease and from 35% to 58% in patients with controlled disease (12). However, previous prospective studies on SAS in acromegaly patients included only 2 time points and reports on the course of SAS after treatment of acromegaly are conflicting (3, 4, 9, 12–20): both persistence of SAS in patients with controlled disease and reversion of SAS in patients with ongoing acromegaly have been reported. Due to these heterogeneous outcomes—which may be caused by inclusion of treated patients at baseline, different durations of follow-up, unclear definitions of remission, and varying treatment regimens—the influence of acromegaly treatment on the course of SAS is still unclear. In order to overcome the aforementioned limitations and to gain knowledge on the effects of acromegaly treatment on SAS, as well as to improve SAS treatment and patient counseling, we systematically assessed the prevalence of SAS in consecutive treatment-naive patients with acromegaly and analyzed the influence of acromegaly treatment on SAS during the first 2.5 years after initiation of treatment, at 3 predetermined time points.

Materials and Methods

Particpants

All untreated adult patients with acromegaly who visited the outpatient department of the Radboudumc between July 2012 and June 2016 were eligible to be included in this study. The diagnosis of acromegaly was biochemically confirmed by an increased serum IGF-1 level (> 2 SD above the sex- and age-adjusted mean) and insufficient suppression of serum GH levels during an oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT; GH ≥ 0.4 µg/L) (1). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary gland was performed in each patient to identify a pituitary adenoma. Patients with comorbidities that could influence the prevalence of sleep apnea (eg, muscular dystrophy, unsubstituted hypothyroidism) were not eligible.

Patients visited our hospital at diagnosis (T0), after 1 year (T1), and after 2.5 years (T2). At each visit, patients underwent PSG, filled out the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and were assessed for body weight and blood pressure. Measurement of IGF-1 level was performed on venous blood from the patient in the non-fasted state. At T0, height and GH levels were also measured.

After diagnosis, standard care consisted of pretreatment with a long-acting somatostatin receptor analogue (SSA) for approximately 6 months, followed by endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal adenomectomy (EETA), or primary medical therapy in patients who were not suitable for surgery. If biochemical control was not obtained by SSA monotherapy, the GH-receptor antagonist pegvisomant (PEGV) or a dopamine agonist (DA) was added.

In the case of residual or recurrent disease after surgery, medical therapy was restarted postoperatively. When possible, patients underwent a second surgical approach. In the case of persistent IGF-1 levels above the reference range despite maximal tolerable medical therapy, patients underwent radiotherapy.

Surgical control was defined as postoperative IGF-1 levels within the sex- and age-adjusted reference range, combined with a random GH level < 1 µg/L or a sufficient suppression of serum GH levels (GH < 0.4 µg/L) during an oGTT, performed approximately 4 months after surgery (1, 21), without use of medication. Biochemical control was defined as IGF-1 levels within the sex- and age-adjusted reference range (21) with use of medication (SSA, PEGV, and/or a DA).

Adrenal insufficiency was defined as a morning serum cortisol < 100 nmol/L without use of glucocorticoids for 24 h, or a maximal cortisol response < 550 nmol/L during an insulin tolerance test (ITT) (22). Subclinical adrenal insufficiency was defined as normal morning cortisol levels with an insufficient response (cortisol < 550 nmol/L) during an ITT. Women were defined as postmenopausal when gonadotrophin levels were in the postmenopausal range and/or when they were older than 55 years. In premenopausal women and men, hypogonadism was defined as estrogen or total testosterone levels below the reference range. Hypothyroidism was defined as free thyroxin (fT4) plasma levels < 8 pmol/L (institutional reference range 8–22 pmol/L).

Hypertension was defined as use of antihypertensive therapy because of a previous diagnosis of hypertension or at least 3 office measurements of a systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg and/or a diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg on different days (23).

Diabetes mellitus was defined as use of glucose-lowering medication based on a previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or when fasting glucose levels were ≥ 7 mmol/L and/or random glucose levels were ≥ 11.1 mmol/L on initial examination and after re-measurement at another date (24).

Dyslipidemia was defined as use of a lipid-lowering drug or as levels of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ≥ 5 mmol/L, total cholesterol ≥ 7 mmol/L and/or triglycerides ≥ 2 mmol/L at 2 or more measurements (25).

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by our local ethical committee (CMO regio Arnhem-Nijmegen; 2012–131). All subjects signed informed consent prior to participation.

Hormone assays

Serum IGF-1 and GH levels were determined using a chemiluminescent immunometric assay (Liaison, DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy).

Polysomnography

Complete overnight polysomnography (PSG) was performed between 9:00 pm and 6:00 am using either a Compumedics System (Series E EEG/PSG, Compumedics Limited Global Corporate HQ, Victoria, Australia) or a SOMNOscreen™ plus PSG Tele + Video system (SOMNOmedics,GmbH, Randersacker, Germany). The results were analyzed according to the current standard of care (26) with Profusion PSG software (Compumedics; version 1.01 build 16) respectively Domino software (SOMNOmedics). Four-channel electroencephalography, electro-oculography, and chin electromyography were performed. Oronasal airflow was recorded by a thermistor and thoracic and abdominal respiratory efforts were measured by impedance plethysmography. Oxygen saturation was measured by finger pulse oximetry and electrocardiography was performed from standard leads. Body position was monitored by a position sensor. Patients who were treated by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) after diagnosis of SAS, discontinued this treatment at least 3 days prior to PSG at follow-up measurements. Respiratory events were scored according to the recommendations of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) (6). An apnea was defined as an event of at least 10 seconds with an airflow drop by ≥ 90% compared to baseline during at least 90% of the event. Obstructive apneas are accompanied by continued inspiratory effort, which is absent in central apneas. Mixed apneas are characterized by absence of inspiratory effort in the initial part of the event, followed by resumption of inspiratory effort in the second part.

The oxygen desaturation index (ODI) is defined as ≥ 4% arterial oxygen desaturations per hour. Hypopnea was defined as an event of at least 10 seconds with an airflow drop by ≥ 30% compared to baseline, combined with a ≥ 4% desaturation from pre-event baseline values, during at least 90% of the event. Respiratory effort–related arousals (RERAs) are obstructive events with a sequence of breaths for at least 10 seconds, characterized by increased respiratory effort or by flattening of the inspiratory portion of the nasal pressure waveform, leading to an arousal from sleep. In addition, this sequence of breaths does not meet criteria for an apnea or hypopnea (26). The respiratory disturbance index (RDI) is the sum of the number of apneas, hypopneas and RERAs per hour of sleep during PSG. The apnea hypopnea index (AHI) is the sum of the number of apneas and hypopneas under these conditions.

The diagnosis of SAS was confirmed when the RDI was ≥ 5 combined with loud snoring, witnessed breathing interruptions, awakening due to gasping or choking and/or excessive daytime sleepiness (6). OSAS was defined mild when the RDI was ≥ 5 and < 15, moderate when ≥ 15 and < 30 and severe when RDI ≥ 30 (6). The term OSAS was used to describe both obstructive apneic and hypopneic events, since OSAS is the predominant form of SAS in patients with acromegaly and also in our cohort.

Epworth Sleepiness Scale

The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) was used to measure daytime sleepiness (27). The ESS describes 8 situations, which are each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 based on the likeliness that the person would doze off or fall asleep in the specific situation (0 = would never doze; 1 = slight chance of dozing; 2 = moderate chance of dozing; 3 = high chance of dozing). A total ESS score from 0 to 10 is considered normal (28).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with SPSS 25.0. Data are represented as number with percentages for categorical variables and as mean with SD or as median with minimum and maximum values for continuous variables, depending on the normality of the distribution, which was tested by the Shapiro-Wilk test. At baseline, between-group differences in continuous variables were tested with an independent samples T-test for normally distributed and a Mann-Whitney U test for nonnormally distributed data. Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables. Spearman rank correlation was used to determine correlations. For correlations between a continuous and a dichotomous variable, point-biserial correlations (Rpb) were determined.

All available prospective data were analyzed with a multilevel linear model or with Friedman’s two-way analysis, depending on the normality of the distribution. Nonnormally distributed data were log-transformed and the derived residuals were tested for normality. If log-transformation did not result in normally distributed residuals, nonparametric tests were used. The Hodges-Lehman test was used to determine median differences between measurements in nonparametric tests. For categorical values generalized linear models with likelihood ratios were used.

To calculate correlation coefficients on repeated observations within subjects, the method of Bland and Altman was used (29). All tests were two-tailed. P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Participant characteristics (Tables 1–4)

Thirty-two patients were eligible for participation; 5 patients refused because of time constraints (N = 2) or fear of the study procedures (N = 3). The remaining 27 patients were included in the study, of whom 12 (44.4%) were male. The mean age was 51.3 ± 13.5 years. Nineteen (70.4%) patients had a GH-secreting macroadenoma (> 1 cm), 7 patients had a microadenoma (≤ 1 cm) and 1 patient had a GH-releasing hormone–producing bronchial intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumor (NET). In 1 patient, no oGTT was performed at diagnosis because of uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus.

One patient completed his biochemical female-to-male gender transformation (as reported in a case report (30)) 20 months prior to baseline and is classified as male in the data analysis.

One patient discontinued the study shortly after T0 because she moved to another city and continued her treatment in another hospital. Twenty-six patients completed the follow-up period.

Disease control and acromegaly treatment

(Table 3). Twenty-three patients (85.2%) started pretreatment with a SSA, for a mean duration of 6 months (range, 5–11), followed by EETA. In 1 of these patients, PEGV was added to the pretreatment because of insufficiently-controlled IGF-1 levels with SSA monotherapy. A DA was added in another patient because of concomitant hyperprolactinemia. One patient refused SSA pretreatment and underwent EETA 6 weeks after baseline. Two women did not undergo EETA, due to advanced age and the presence of an inoperable giant adenoma. They were primarily treated with a SSA and a SSA combined with PEGV, respectively. The patient with the bronchial NET underwent a partial lobectomy without pretreatment 8 weeks after diagnosis.

Table 3.

Course of Treatment, RDI, OSAS, BMI, and IGF-1 Levels in Individual Patients

Course of Individual Patients				Baseline—T0				1 Year—T1				2.5 Years—T2
No	Sex	Treatment	RDI	OSAS	BMI	IGF-1	RDI	OSAS	BMI	IGF-1	RDI	OSAS	BMI	IGF-1
1	M	MS (0-6) + S: cured	46.3	+	31.1	208	17.9	+	29.4	O	14.2	-	30.7	13
2	M	MS (0-6) + S: cured	24.2	+	24.9	80.7	3.8	-	25.6	34.8	5.1	-	24	28
3	M	MS (0-6) + S: cured	35.2	+	25.6	111	6.6	+	24.8	O	5.6	-	24.7	29.8
4	M	MS (0-7) + S: cured	54.6	+	24.6	61.9	95	+	25	25.1	8.4	+	24.8	29.4
5	M	MS (0-6) + S: cured	26.9	+	28.1	66.7	11.6	+	28	8.5	14.1	-	28.7	34.1
6	F	MS (0-6) + S: cured	32.5	+	23.5	108	14.1	+	23.1	23.6	7.9	-	22.5	18.2
7	F	MS (0-6) + S: cured	17.6	+	30.7	77.2	6.1	-	30.5	20.4	0.4	-	31.5	22.4
8	F	MS (0-6) + S: cured	27.9	+	27.5	97.3	15.7	+	34.6	23.5	1.2	-	28.5	25.5
9	F	MS (0-6) + S: RD	12.1	+	32.3	79.8	3	-	33.3	36.5	1.3	-	31.4	28.3
		MS (14-30): BC (16-30)
10	F	MS (0-8) + S: cured	99.2	+	32.6	80.1	3.9	-	35.5	19.3	5.9	-	35	10.2
11	M	S (2): cured	5.5	-	28.7	122.1	13.4	-	25.5	34.2	7.2	-	26.1	30.4
12	F	Primary MS (0-30): BC (6-30)	6.2	-	25.7	40.6	1.9	-	26.5	24.7	14.4	-	26.8	28
13	F	MS (0-6) + S: RD	1.2	-	21.2	83.7	4	-	21.7	48.3	0	-	20.1	17.8
		MS (13-30): BC (15-30)
14	F	MS (0-6) + S: cured	7.1	-	21.3	63.8	18.1	+	21.2	11	4.6	-	22	11.7
15	F	MS (0-6) + S: RD	3.1	-	32.6	118.7	3.7	-	37.5	54.4	1.3	-	38.4	25.8
		MS (12-24) + MP (15-22) + reS (24): cured
16	M	MS (0-6) + S: RD	77.4	+	26.4	109.5	70.3	+	28.2	27.4	24.1	+	26.7	20.3
		MS (11-30): BC (12-30)
17	F	MS (0-6) S: RD	20.9	+	29.1	146	O	O	27.6	83.2	9.7	-	28	25.9
		MS (8-30) + MP (11-30) + SRT (20-21): BC (29-30)
18	M	S (1.5): RD	35.9	+	30.2	132.5	13.9	+	29.7	40.7	8.6	-	29.1	28
		MS (2.5-30): BC (14-30)
19	F	MS (0-11) + S: cured	2.2	-	25.8	53.5	2.6	-	26.3	17.2	9.1	-	27	15.6
20	F	MS (0-6) + S: RD	5.2	-	27.5	85.2	O	O	24.6	20.2	2.4	-	25	21.1
		MS (8-30): BC (10-30)
21	M	MS + MD (0-6) + S: RD	Oa	+	36.2	95.7	3.6	-	38.4	34.9	23.7	+	30.3	34
		MS + MD (14-30): BC (24-30)
22	M	MS (0-6) + MP (4-6) + S: RD	13.3	+	33.1	114.2	0.2	-	34.3	45.9	O	O	30.4	27
		MS (9-30) + MP (10-30) + GRS (12): BC (15-30)
23	M	MS (0-6) + S: cured	28	+	31.6	130.4	35.4	+	30.5	40.3	24.1	+	28.8	21.9
24	F	MS (0-6) + S: cured	23.8	+	25.6	105.8	26.7	+	26.9	31.6	O	O	26.4	28.7
25	M	MS (0-5) + S: cured	47.3	+	34.3	145.4	16.1	+	35	20.6	O	O	31.1	33
26	F	Lost to follow-up	7.9	+	30.8	84.5	Lost to follow-up				Lost to follow-up
27	F	Primary MS (0-30) + MP (9-30): BC (22-30)	15.2	+	35.1	84.6	24.3	+	43.1	36.1	5.2	+	41	19.3
		Patients with OSAS		20 (74.1%)				13 (54.2%)				5 (21.7%)

In patients with medical pretreatment, surgery and cessation of medical treatment took place simultaneously. The moment or timespan of treatment in months is displayed between parentheses. In the OSAS column, a ‘+’ means that OSAS is present, a ‘-’ means that OSAS is absent. Abbreviations: O, data not available; M, medical treatment; MS, medical treatment with a somatostatin analogue (SSA); MP, medical treatment with pegvisomant (PEGV); MD, medical treatment with a dopamine agonist; MS + MP, medical treatment with SSA combined with PEGV; MS + MD, medical treatment SSA combined with a dopamine agonist; S, surgery; SRT: stereotactic radiotherapy; GRS, gammaknife radiosurgery; BC, biochemical control with use of medication; Re-s, second surgical procedure; RD, residual or recurrent disease; AHI, apnea hypopnea index; BMI, body mass index in kg/m2; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; GH, growth hormone; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; LSaO2, lowest oxygen saturation; NA, not applicable; ODI, oxygen desaturation index; OSAS, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; RDI, respiratory disturbance index. aThe baseline PSG of this patient was of insufficient quality to calculate RDI or AHI, but he had an oxygen desaturation index (ODI) of 80/hour and has been diagnosed with severe OSAS prior to study participation.

At T1, 15 of the 24 surgically treated patients (62.5%) were in surgical control and 9 patients (37.5%) had residual or recurrent disease. Four patients had repeatedly normal IGF-1 levels combined with a mildly disturbed oGTT (GH nadir 0.7–0.8 µg/L). Since their IGF-1 values fell within the reference range, they were considered surgically controlled patients in the analysis (1).

Of the patients who underwent PSG (N = 24) at T1, 15 patients (62.5%) were surgically controlled, 2 patients (8.3%) were biochemically controlled and 7 patients (29.2%) had active acromegaly despite treatment. Six patients were treated with SSA monotherapy, 1 patient with a SSA combined with a DA, and 2 patients with a SSA combined with PEGV.

At T2, all 23 patients who underwent PSG were in surgical (N = 14; 60.9%) or biochemical control (N = 9; 39.1%). Five patients were treated with SSA monotherapy, 1 patient with a SSA combined with a DA, and 3 patients with a SSA combined with PEGV.

Between T1 and T2, 1 female participant underwent a second surgical procedure and was in surgical remission afterwards. In addition, 1 male patient underwent gammaknife radiosurgery and 1 female patient underwent stereotactic radiotherapy between T1 and T2 while they were being treated with a SSA and PEGV.

Between T0 and T2, IGF-1 levels decreased from 99.5 ± 34.8 to 23.5 ± 6.9 nmol/L (P < 0.001); no significant changes in body mass index (BMI) were found between these time points.

Hormonal deficiencies.

At baseline, 2 patients had a history of hypothyroidism, 1 primary and 1 secondary, and had been adequately treated with substitution therapy for at least 3 months. One patient developed hypothyroidism due to autoimmune thyroiditis (anti-TPO levels > 1000 U/mL) during treatment with SSA; at T1, all 3 patients were adequately substituted with levothyroxine for more than 3 months.

From diagnosis until the end of the study, 1 patient had secondary adrenal insufficiency and received daily glucocorticoid substitution therapy. Another subject had normal unstimulated cortisol levels but failed to reach the maximal cortisol response (ie, serum cortisol level > 550 nmol/L) during an ITT both before and after EETA. Therefore, he only used substitution during physical or mental stress. One female developed a subclinical adrenal insufficiency after a second surgical procedure between T1 and T2.

At T0, 8 men had hypogonadism: 1 had unsubstituted primary hypogonadism as a result of a bilateral orchidopexia in childhood, and the other 7 men had unsubstituted secondary hypogonadism. Eleven women were postmenopausal. At T2, 3 men had recovered from secondary hypogonadism. Four hypogonadal men were substituted with a stable dose of testosterone for at least 3 months and 1 male with mild and asymptomatic hypogonadism refused substitution therapy. One premenopausal woman developed secondary amenorrhea combined with estrogen values below the reference range after postoperative radiation therapy between T1 and T2.

Polysomnography (PSG) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) (Figs. 1 & 2)

PSG at T0 was performed in 27 patients, of whom 20 were diagnosed with OSAS (74.1%). Five patients had mild, 6 moderate, and 9 severe OSAS (Fig. 1; Table 2). Patients with OSAS had a higher body weight (95.3 vs 73.1 kg; P = 0.01) than patients without OSAS. BMI was higher, but not statistically significantly, in patients with OSAS relative to those without OSAS (29.7 vs 26.1 kg/m2; P = 0.07). ESS scores did not differ between patients with or without OSAS (11.3 vs 12; P = 0.78). However, ESS scores in patients with no or mild OSAS were lower compared with patients with moderate or severe OSAS (9.33 vs 12.8; P = 0.04). In addition, IGF-1, but not GH, levels were lower in patients with no or mild OSAS compared with patients with moderate or severe OSAS (83.3 vs 112.5 nmol/L; P = 0.02). Eleven patients had already used or started CPAP based on the PSG at T0. The 5 patients with mild OSAS were not treated with CPAP. One patient chose mandibular repositioning appliance treatment and 3 patients refused OSAS treatment despite having moderate OSAS.

Figure 1.

Course of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) severity per time point.

Table 2.

Course of Clinical, Biochemical and Sleep Characteristics

Patient Characteristics	T0 (N = 27)	T1 (N = 24)	T2 (N = 23)	P Value ΔT0-T1	P Value ΔT0-T2
Sex, male (%)	12 (44.4)	12 (50)	10 (43.5)	NA	NA
Age (years)	51.3 ± 13.5	NA	NA	NA	NA
Weight (kg)	89.5 ± 20.3	93.6 ± 23	87.7 ± 19.5	0.06	0.07
BMI (kg/m 2 )	28.7 ± 4.1	29.8 ± 5.6	28.3 ± 5	0.07	0.07
Duration of symptoms (years)	7.5 (2–28)	NA	NA	NA	NA
Diabetes mellitus (N, %)	5 (18.5)	5 (20.8)	5 (21.7)	1	1
Hypothyroidism (N, %)	2 (7.4)	3 (12.5)	3 (13)	0.67	0.91
Hypocortisolism (N, %)	2 (7.4)	2 (8.3)	2 (8.7)a	0.9	0.99
Hypogonadism (N, %)	8 (29.6)	6 (25)	5 (2.17)a	0.53	0.87
Random GH (µg/L)	7.7 (1.8–127.7)	NA	NA	NA	NA
IGF-1 (nmol/L)	99.5 ± 34.8	31.7 ± 16.3	23.5 ± 6.9	<0.001	<0.001
IGF-1 SDS	7.6 (3.5-23.2)	1.5 (-2; 4.8)	1 (-1.2; 2.3)	<0.001	<0.001
Current smoker (N, %)	2 (7.4)	2 (8.3)	3 (8.7)	1	0.92
Alcohol consumer: yes (N, %)	18 (66.7)	16 (66.7)	14 (60.9)	1	0.9
Macroadenoma (N, %)	19 (70.4)	NA	NA	NA	NA
RDI (/hour)	22.4 (1.2-99.2)	12.5 (0.2-95)	7.2 (0-24.1)	0.18	0.001
AHI (/hour)	14.2 (0.5-64.6)	5.3 (0-52.8)	4 (0-23.6)	0.039	0.001
ODI (/hour)	12.8 (0.6-80.5)	7.0 (0.1-62.7)	3.5 (0-21.1)	0.01	0.001
LSaO 2  (%)	84 (68-90)	86 (67-92)	87 (72-93)	0.05	0.007
ESS	11.2 ± 4.4	6.8 ± 3	6.6 ± 3.3	<0.001	<0.001
Apnea type b  (N, %)				0.91	0.15
Obstructive/hypopnea	26 (96.3)	23 (95.8)	22 (95.7)
Mixed (obstructive + central)	1 (3.7)	0	0
OSAS severity (based on RDI; N, %)				0.001	<0.001
No (<5)	7 (25.9)	11 (45.8)	18 (78.3)
Mild (5-14)	5 (18.5)	8 (33.3)	3 (13.0)
Moderate (15-29)	6 (22.2)	3 (12.5)	2 (8.7)
Severe (>30)	9 (33.3)	2 (8.3)	0 (0)
Disease status (N, %)				<0.001	<0.001
Untreated/Active	27	0	0
Surgical remission	0 (0)	15 (62.5)	14 (60.9)
Biochemical remission	0 (0)	2 (8.3)	9 (39.1)
Active despite treatment	0 (0)	7 (29.2)	0 (0)

Values are displayed as mean with standard deviation (SD) or as median with minimum and maximum, depending on the normality of the distribution. Categorical variables are displayed as numbers (percentage). Abbreviations: AHI, apnea hypopnea index; BMI, body mass index in kg/m2; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; GH, growth hormone; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; LSaO2, lowest oxygen saturation; NA, not applicable; ODI, oxygen desaturation index; OSAS, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; RDI, respiratory disturbance index; SDS, standard deviation score. aOne male with hypogonadism and hypocortisolism did not undergo a PSG at T2. bOne patient did not demonstrate any event during PSG at T1 and T2.

PSG was repeated 1 year after diagnosis (T1) in 24 patients, and 2.5 years after diagnosis (T2) in 23 patients. At T1, 1 patient was lost to follow up, and 2 PSGs were of insufficient quality due to technical problems and were omitted from the data analysis. Of these patients, 2 had OSAS at baseline (patients 17 and 26) and 1 (patient 20) did not have OSAS. Of the 20 patients who had OSAS at T0, 6 (30%) were cured of OSAS at T1 (Table 3). Of the remaining patients, 2 had severe, 3 moderate, and 7 mild OSAS (Table 2; Fig. 1). In addition, 1 patient developed mild OSAS during follow-up. Sleep parameters worsened in 5 patients (20.8%; 3 male and 2 female) between T0 and T1, although there was no increase in IGF-1 levels in these patients (4 out of 5 had a normal or decreased IGF-1 level relative to T0), they did not develop pituitary hormonal deficiencies, and BMI was stable or declined in all but 1 female patient, who had a significantly higher BMI at T1 compared to T0. The remaining 5 patients did not have OSAS at T0 nor at T1. Of the 11 patients using CPAP, 5 (45.5%) successfully discontinued CPAP therapy at T1 due to improvement of OSAS.

At T2, 3 patients were not willing to undergo PSG due to time constraints; 1 of whom was cured of OSAS at T1 while the other 2 had mild OSAS at T1, for which 1 used CPAP therapy during the entire follow-up period. At T2, 11 of the 16 patients with OSAS at T0 and repeated PSGs were cured of OSAS (68.8%). In all other patients, OSAS severity was strongly reduced: 2 patients had moderate and 3 patients had mild OSAS (Table 2; Fig. 1). Regarding the total group with OSAS at baseline (N = 20), cure of OSAS was established in 12 patients during follow-up (60%) and OSAS persisted in 5 patients. In 3 patients, who did not undergo PSG at T2, the presence of absence of OSAS at T2 was unknown. In Table 4, the parameters displayed in Table 2 are depicted for the 23 patients who underwent PSG at both T0 and T2.

Table 4.

Course of Clinical, Biochemical, and Sleep Characteristics in Patients Who Underwent PSG at T0 and T2

Patient Characteristics	T0 (N = 23)	T1 (N = 21)	T2 (N = 23)	P Value ΔT0-T1	P Value ΔT0-T2
Sex, male (%)	10 (43.5)	10 (47.6)	10 (43.5)	NA	NA
Age (years)	52.61 ± 13.4	NA	NA	NA	NA
Weight (kg)	88.1 ± 19.6	90.4 ± 22.2	87.7 ± 19.5	0.1	0.11
BMI (kg/m 2 )	28.4 ± 4.1	29.2 ± 5.6	28.3 ± 5	0.1	0.11
Duration of symptoms (years)	7 (2-28)	NA	NA	NA	NA
Diabetes mellitus (N, %)	5 (21.7)	5 (23.8)	5 (21.7)	1	1
Hypothyroidism (N, %)	2 (8.7)	3 (14.3)	3 (13)	0.66	0.83
Hypocortisolism (N, %)	1 (4.3)	1 (4.8)	2 (8.7)	1	0.8
Hypogonadism (N, %)	6 (26.1)	5 (23.8)	5 (21.7)	1	0.94
Random GH (µg/L)	24.2 (5.3-383)	NA	NA	NA	NA
IGF-1 (nmol/L)	97.3 ± 36.1	31.6 ± 27.4	23.5 ± 6.9	<0.001	<0.001
IGF-1 SDS	7.6 (3.5-23.2)	1.5 (-2; 9.1)	1 (-1.2; 2.3)	<0.001	<0.001
Current smoker (N, %)	2 (8.7)	2 (9.5)	3 (13)	1	0.88
Alcohol consumer: yes (N, %)	15 (65.2)	13 (61.9)	14 (60.9)	1	0.95
Macroadenoma (N, %)	17 (73.9)	NA	NA	NA	NA
RDI (/hour)	22.6 (1.2-99.2)	11.6 (1.9-95)	7.2 (0-24.1)	0.057	0.002
AHI (/hour)	15.4 (0.5-64.6)	5.2 (1.1-52.8)	4 (0-23.6)	0.046	0.002
ODI (/hour)	15.2 (1.5-80.5)	6.5 (1.4-62.7)	3.5 (0-21.1)	0.01	<0.001
LSaO 2  (%)	84 (68-90)	86 (67-91)	87 (72-93)	0.15	0.013
ESS	11.7 ± 4.3	7 ± 3.2	6.6 ± 3.3	<0.001	<0.001
Apnea type a  (N, %)				1	1
Obstructive/hypopnea	22 (95.7)	21 (100)	22 (95.7)
Mixed (obstructive + central)	1 (4.3)	0	0
OSAS severity (based on RDI; N, %)				0.04	<0.001
No (<5)	4 (17.4)	10 (47.6)	18 (78.3)
Mild (5-14)	6 (26.1)	6 (28.6)	3 (13)
Moderate (15-29)	5 (21.7)	3 (14.3)	2 (8.7)
Severe (>30)	8 (39.1)	2 (9.5)	0 (0)
Disease status (N, %)
Untreated/Active	23 (100)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Surgical remission	0 (0)	13 (61.9)	14 (60.9)	<0.001	<0.001
Biochemical remission	0 (0)	2 (9.5)	9 (39.1)
Active despite treatment	0 (0)	6 (28.6)	0 (0)

Values are displayed as mean with (SD) or as median with minimum and maximum, depending on the normality of the distribution. Categorical variables are displayed as numbers (percentage). Abbreviations: AHI, apnea hypopnea index; BMI, body mass index in kg/m2; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; GH, growth hormone; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; LSaO2, lowest oxygen saturation; NA, not applicable; ODI, oxygen desaturation index; OSAS, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; RDI, respiratory disturbance index; SDS, standard deviation score. aOne patient did not demonstrate any event during PSG at T1 and T2.

Two patients (1 male with OSAS, 1 female without OSAS) had a deterioration of sleep parameters between T1 and T2 without changes in IGF-1 levels, presence of pituitary hormonal deficiencies, and with a similar BMI in 1 patient and a lower BMI in the other patient.

The patient who developed mild OSAS at T1 was cured from OSAS at T2; the other 4 patients who had a deterioration of sleep parameters at T1 also showed an improvement of sleep parameters at T2.

The prevalence of established OSAS was 21.7% (5 of 23 patients) at T2. CPAP was discontinued in 2 additional patients at T2. In total, CPAP therapy was ended because of amelioration of OSAS in 7 out of 11 (63.6%) patients who had been using CPAP since T0.

The RDI, ODI, and ESS scores decreased between T0 and T2 (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively), whereas the LSaO2 that was measured during PSG increased (P = 0.007); the largest changes were observed between T0 and T1 (Fig. 2; Tables 2 and 3).

Figure 2.

Course of sleep parameters and ESS. (A) Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI); (B) Lowest oxygen saturation; (C) Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI); (D) Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Each colored line represents the course of the parameter in a single subject.

Correlation analysis

The correlation between RDI and AHI was 0.94 (P < 0.001); the RDI and AHI correlated with the ODI (both R 0.87; P < 0.001). Male gender correlated with the RDI and AHI (Rpb 0.47; P = 0.012 and Rpb 0.49; P = 0.009, respectively), and with the ODI (Rpb 0.46; P = 0.016). At baseline, GH levels correlated with the ODI (R 0.39; P = 0.049) and ESS scores (R 0.5; P = 0.01), but not with other sleep parameters. None of the sleep parameters correlated with BMI or body weight after correction for gender.

At baseline, OSAS severity correlated with IGF-1 levels (R 0.38; P = 0.049), the RDI (R 0.95; P < 0.001), ODI (R 0.92; P < 0.001), LSaO2 (R-0.56; P = 0.003), and male gender (Rpb 0.59; P = 0.001). OSAS severity did not correlate with the presence of hormonal deficiencies, ESS scores, or GH levels. Using Blant-Altman correlations for repeated measures within individuals, the decrease in IGF-1 levels during follow-up correlated with improvement in RDI (R 0.51; P < 0.001), AHI (R 0.53; P < 0.001), ESS (R 0.70; P < 0.001), and ODI (R 0.53; P < 0.001). The LSaO2 negatively correlated to the decrease in IGF-1 levels (R −0.43; P = 0.003). The decrease of ESS scores correlated with the improvement in RDI (R 0.4; P = 0.01), AHI (R 0.39; P = 0.01), ODI (R 0.56; P < 0.001), and LSaO2 (R −0.44; P = 0.004). To conclude, the decrease in IGF-1 levels is associated with a decrease in RDI/AHI, ODI, and ESS and an increase in LSaO2 within a patient over time.

Discussion

This is the first prospective study that systematically assessed the presence and course of OSAS in consecutive treatment-naive patients with acromegaly, from diagnosis until 2.5 years after start of treatment. We found that, when performing screening for OSAS at diagnosis, 74.1% of the patients with untreated acromegaly had OSAS. Successful treatment of acromegaly resulted in a substantial reduction in the prevalence and severity of OSAS. The greatest improvement in OSAS severity and prevalence occurred in the first year after initiating treatment, and a strong correlation between change in sleep parameters and IGF-1 levels was observed.

The innovative and distinctive aspects of our study are its homogeneous cohort of consecutive treatment-naive patients, its standardized treatment protocol, and the systematical assessments at 3 predetermined time points during a relatively long follow-up of 2.5 years. In addition, inclusion of only treatment-naive patients excluded treatment-related effects on sleep parameters at baseline. A prospective study with this size and study protocol has not been conducted before.

The prevalence of OSAS that we observed in untreated acromegaly patients corresponds with the previous reported prevalence of OSAS in active acromegaly (44%–87.5%) (3, 12, 14, 17–19), whereas the prevalence of OSAS in controlled patients (21.7%) was lower compared to previous reports (35%–58%) (3, 17–19, 31).

In addition, OSAS severity diminished in all subjects during acromegaly treatment, which is in line with previous studies, which reported that both SSA treatment (7, 32, 33) and adenomectomy (34) are effective in attenuating OSAS severity in acromegaly, even in patients without completely controlled acromegaly (16).

Although previous studies had already indicated the high prevalence of OSAS in acromegaly patients and the potential for OSAS improvement after remission of acromegaly, the findings of the present longitudinal study are highly relevant since they provide more precise information about the effects of acromegaly treatment on the course of OSAS. This information highlights the necessity of disease control and could have a large impact on patient counseling and management of OSAS, and thereby quality of life, in acromegaly patients.

The differences in OSAS prevalence in controlled patients between the current study and previous studies can probably be explained by the fact that our longitudinal study had a predetermined follow-up period and consisted of 3 measurements at predetermined intervals. Previous prospective studies performed PSG at baseline and repeated PSG only once after variable periods of time (1–22 years after biochemical remission or 6 weeks to 6 months after surgery or start of medical treatment) (3, 17, 18, 33–35), which obscured an accurate assessment of the course of OSAS. Furthermore, we only included consecutive treatment-naive patients, whereas others also included patients with active acromegaly despite treatment (17–19, 32), as acromegaly treatment is known to reduce OSAS severity, even when IGF-1 levels are not normalized (7, 16, 32). Previous studies also often describe small and heterogeneous cohorts, or used different or unclear criteria for remission of acromegaly or OSAS (3, 9, 17–20, 31).

In this study, the RDI was used for diagnosing OSAS, since it largely determines OSAS severity and consequently the indication for CPAP therapy (6). However, this most likely does not explain the difference in OSAS prevalence with previous studies using the AHI (3, 16, 19, 32), since the majority of our patients with OSAS also fulfilled the criteria for OSAS based on the AHI (95% at T0 and 100% at T2), and a strong correlation between the RDI and AHI (R 0.96; P < 0.001) was observed.

A recent study found that patients with serum IGF-1 levels in the highest quartiles were more likely to have OSAS (12). Although a strong trend towards higher absolute IGF-1 levels (106 vs 81.1 nmol/L; P = 0.1) and IGF-1 standard deviation score (7.8 vs 5.6; P = 0.08) was observed in OSAS patients at baseline, this difference was not statistically significant. As reported by some (14, 18, 19), but not all authors (3, 17, 20), OSAS severity at baseline did correlate with IGF-1 levels. In addition, when comparing patients with no or mild OSAS vs patients with moderate or severe OSAS, IGF-1 levels were lower in patients with no/mild OSAS. We also observed a strong correlation between the changes in the RDI (and AHI) and IGF-1 levels in time, which has not been reported earlier in prospective studies, although a correlation between GH levels and the AHI was mentioned (33). However, previous studies were restricted by variable intervals between PSG, and by small and heterogeneous cohorts, which may have hampered correlation analysis.

Most likely, soft tissue hypertrophy and airway narrowing are major causal factors for the development of OSAS in active acromegaly (3, 4). Uvula and tongue hypertrophy (3, 7, 33), mucosal thickening/edema of the upper airways and bronchi (18), and increased collapsibility of the passive pharynx (36) are a result of GH and IGF-1 hypersecretion (37, 38) and are reported to be related to the AHI (33, 39).

Moreover, upper airway mucosal edema is an inflammatory process, and IGF-1 excess has been suggested to be a pro-inflammatory state (40, 41). Therefore, lowering of IGF-1 levels by acromegaly treatment may lead to reversal of these pro-inflammatory changes (42) and—consequently—soft tissue swelling, and thereby impact on OSAS severity (43). Indeed, acromegaly treatment resulting in IGF-1 normalization is reported to reduce the RDI/AHI and tongue volume, and IGF-1 levels correlated with tongue volume (7, 44).

Importantly, next to a strong reduction in the RDI, the LSaO2 also increased from 84% to 87% between T0 to T2. This is clinically relevant since hypoxemia, reflected by the LsaO2, is suggested to play a key role in the development of OSAS-associated CVD (45, 46).

Besides objective sleep parameters, ESS scores—as a subjective measure of sleepiness—correlated with GH and IGF-1 levels at baseline, and with IGF-1 levels over time. Over time, the improvement of ESS scores correlated with the improvements in the RDI and AHI, in line with a previous report (47). Importantly, CPAP therapy may have modified ESS scores at T1 and T2 in OSAS patients, since CPAP reduces sleepiness in the majority of patients (48).

In addition, ESS scores did not reliably distinguish between patients with and without OSAS at baseline. This can be explained by the low sensitivity, and moderate specificity and accuracy of the ESS in the identification of patients with OSAS (49).

Probably, additional risk factors other than acromegaly per se exist for developing OSAS in acromegaly, since patients with OSAS tended to have a higher body weight and BMI, and were predominantly male. These classical risk factors for OSAS are reported both in patients with acromegaly (7, 12, 16, 18, 50, 51) and in OSAS patients from the general population (8, 52). In contrast to earlier reports in acromegaly (4, 7, 16, 18, 53), OSAS was not related to age or patient-reported disease duration.

Importantly, besides GH/IGF-1, other pituitary-derived hormones may also influence sleep parameters. Adrenal insufficiency has a prevalence of approximately 12% in acromegaly (54, 55). However, although both increased (56) and decreased (57) cortisol levels have been reported in OSAS patients, the majority of studies have not demonstrated a relation between presence of OSAS and cortisol levels (58). With respect to thyroid dysfunction, in general, the prevalence of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism was similar in OSAS patients and healthy controls (0.4%–5%) (59–61), but the prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism (11%) was higher in OSAS patients (60, 62). Lower estradiol and/or progesterone levels are associated with the occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing (63). In addition, low testosterone levels are associated with an increased risk of OSAS (64) and short-term testosterone replacement is reported to worsen or induce OSAS (65), whereas others report no effects on OSAS severity (31). Hypogonadism has a high prevalence (53%–70%) in active acromegaly (66, 67), although the gonadal axis recovers after achievement of (biochemical) remission in a significant number of cases (67–69). In the present study, 3 (37.5%) patients with hypogonadism at diagnosis recovered after treatment, and substitution therapy was started in 5 patients. Since the prevalence of hormonal deficiencies was similar in patients with and without OSAS, and did not significantly correlate with sleep parameters, we did not correct for hormonal deficiencies in the statistical analysis.

Regarding the course of OSAS, the largest improvement of OSAS in our cohort was observed during the first year of treatment, although in most patients, the improvements in sleep parameters continued up to the end of follow-up. Interestingly, a deterioration of sleep parameters during acromegaly treatment was observed in 5 patients between T0 and T1 (followed by a subsequent improvement of sleep parameters between T1 and T2) and in 2 patients between T1 and T2, a phenomenon that has been reported earlier (14, 18, 32). There was no relation with BMI and IGF-1 levels in any but 1 patient (patient 27). Possibly, the deterioration of sleep parameters may be explained by variability in changes of soft tissue volume, or other factors we did not measure, during acromegaly treatment (14, 18).

Importantly, all but 2 patients no longer required CPAP therapy at T2 (indication for CPAP: RDI ≥ 15/hour with or without symptoms, or RDI 5–14/hour accompanied by comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus or symptoms as fatigue) (70) since their OSAS was completely resolved or was only mild. Cessation of CPAP therapy reduces costs and discomfort for patients. In an earlier study, OSAS severity decreased after achieving disease control, but not to an extent that CPAP therapy became redundant (17). In that study, the RDI decreased from 31/hour at baseline to 24/hour 6 months after achievement of disease control, which was insufficient to eliminate the indication for CPAP. However, they included a more heterogeneous group of patients with a male predominance and a higher BMI compared to our study. In addition, despite a clear indication, their patients were not treated with CPAP in the interval between the PSGs. In our study, a stronger reduction in the RDI was observed and the majority of our patients therefore lost their indication for CPAP therapy.

A limitation of our study is the relatively small cohort of patients, which makes it difficult to perform subgroup analyses to elucidate factors that influence prevalence and severity of OSAS in acromegaly. However, given the low incidence of acromegaly and the scarcity of treatment-naive patients, it is extremely hard to obtain larger and more homogeneous groups of patients. Nonetheless, our results were highly consistent. In addition, since we performed the second PSG 1 year after diagnosis and most patients underwent both SSA treatment and EETA during this period, it is not possible to differentiate between the distinct effects of those treatments, nor to identify the moment at which the largest changes take place in more detail.

In addition, we did not measure waist circumference, which is a surrogate marker of intra-abdominal fat mass. It has been previously reported that visceral fat mass increases during acromegaly treatment (71, 72), and that increased intra-abdominal fat mass is associated with OSAS (73). Waist circumference was also reported to be a risk factor for OSAS in acromegaly patients (12). Likewise, a larger neck circumference has been reported to be an OSAS risk factor, both in acromegaly patients (9, 74) and in the general population (75, 76). The relation between these easily accessible parameters and sleep parameters/OSAS is highly relevant to address in future studies, and might facilitate OSAS risk prediction in acromegaly patients, alone or in combination with other risk factors as male sex and BMI. This can eventually obviate PSG in acromegaly patients who are unlikely to have OSAS, and thereby contribute to cost-effective health care.

It is possible that long-term use of CPAP has an effect on some outcome measures. Previous reports suggested that the RDI/AHI could be lower in the period directly after withdrawal of CPAP: the so-called washout effect. Therefore, a wash-out period, during which the patient does not use CPAP, is advised prior to a PSG. However, solid data regarding the required duration of this washout period are not available. In a 2015 review article, a washout period of approximately 1 week was suggested, since 1 study reported a more pronounced increase in the RDI 7 days after discontinuation of CPAP compared with 1 day after discontinuation of CPAP (77). Other studies did not confirm this finding and reported an increase in RDI after 1 night without CPAP and a stable RDI during the week thereafter (77, 78). For practical reasons and in order to minimize discomfort for our patients, the participants in our study stopped CPAP therapy 3 nights prior to each PSG. Therefore, it is unlikely, but not impossible, that CPAP therapy influenced our outcomes.

Last, during the conductance of this study, the AASM released new guidelines regarding treatment of OSAS with CPAP therapy (79). We used the previous criteria throughout this study in order to be able to determine changes within individuals and to be able to compare groups of patients. When using the latest criteria, CPAP therapy would have been recommended in 3 additional female patients with asymptomatic mild OSAS and hypertension. Of these patients, 1 patient discontinued the study right after T0, 1 patient was cured from OSAS at T2, and the last patient had mild asymptomatic OSAS at T1 and did not undergo PSG at T2.

Given the high prevalence of OSAS in acromegaly and the high rate of improvement during treatment, we strongly recommend performing a PSG at diagnosis and treatment of OSAS when present. Furthermore, particularly in the case of IGF-1 normalization, we advise repeating the PSG 1 to 1.5 years later, since, based on the results of this study, there is a high chance for improvement of OSAS after decline or normalization of IGF-1 levels. If OSAS resolves, PSGs and CPAP therapy are no longer indicated, which leads to cost reduction and less discomfort for patients. Given the strong relation between the RDI and IGF-1 levels, it is not expected that patients in stable remission of acromegaly would develop OSAS, as long as other risk factors for development of OSAS are not present. This approach likely prevents or mitigates OSAS-related (cardiovascular) morbidity in acromegaly, functional limitations, and loss of quality of life.

In conclusion, OSAS resolved or improved in all acromegaly patients who were surgically or biochemically controlled, with the largest changes taking place during the first year of treatment. The improvement of OSAS parameters is related to the decrease in IGF-1 levels; this represents another clinically relevant reason for stringently aiming towards normalization of IGF-1 in patients with acromegaly. Based on our results, we recommend performing sleep studies in acromegaly patients.

Table 1.

Subgroup Comparison at Baseline (diagnosis; T0): Patients With and Without Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS)

Baseline (T0) Characteristics	Patients With OSAS (N = 20)	Patients Without OSAS (N = 7)	P Value
Sex, male (%)	11 (55)	1 (14.3)	0.09
Age (years)	49.7 ± 11.7	55.9 ± 17.9	0.42
Weight (kg)	95.3 ± 18.5	73.1 ± 16.5	0.01
BMI (kg/m 2 )	29.7 ± 3.8	26.1 ± 4.1	0.07
Duration of symptoms (years)	8 (2–20)	6 (5–28)	0.74
Diabetes mellitus (N, %)	5 (25)	0 (0)	0.28
Hypothyroidism (N, %)	2 (10)	0 (0)	1
Hypocortisolism (N, %)	2 (10)	0 (0)	1
Hypogonadism (N, %)	7 (35)	1 (14.3)	0.63
Random GH (µg/L)	9.4 (2.4-32.6)	7.3 (1.8 -127.7)	0.28
IGF-1 (nmol/L)	106 ± 34.3	81.1 ± 31.1	0.1
IGF-1 SDS	7.8 (5.2-23.2)	5.6 (3.5-12.7)	0.08
Current smoker (N, %)	0 (0)	2 (28.6)	0.06
Alcohol consumption: yes (N, %)	15 (75)	3 (42.9)	0.18
Macroadenoma (N, %)	15 (75)	4 (57.1)	0.36
Microadenoma (N, %)	5 (25)	2 (28.6)
GHRH-producing NET (N, %)	0 (0)	1 (14.3 )
AHI (/hour)	19.8 (5.8-64.6)	2.9 (0.5-6.1)	<0.001
RDI (/hour)	27.9 (7.9-99.2)	5.2 (1.2-7.1)	<0.001
ODI (/hour)	19.8 (0.6-80.5)	4.1 (1.5-7.1)	0.002
LSaO 2  (%)	81.3 ± 6.4	84.8 ± 5.3	0.2
ESS	11.3 (4.8)	12 (3.1)	0.78
OSAS type (N, %)
Obstructive	20 (100)	NA	NA
Central	0 (0)

Values are displayed as mean with (SD) or as median with minimum and maximum, depending on the normality of the distribution. Categorical variables are displayed as numbers (percentage). Abbreviations: AHI, apnea hypopnea index; BMI, body mass index in kg/m2; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale; GH, growth hormone; GHRH, GH-releasing hormone; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; LSaO2, lowest oxygen saturation; NA, not applicable; ODI, oxygen desaturation index; OSAS, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; RDI, respiratory disturbance index; SDS, standard deviation score.