| Literature DB >> 31612044 |
Shujing Xia1,2,3, Qi Tang4, Xudong Wang5, Lili Zhang2, Lizhou Jia1, Duo Wu6, Pingxiang Xu6, Xiumei Zhang7, Genxiong Tang1, Tingting Yang1, Zhenqing Feng1,4,8,9, Lungen Lu3.
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common tumor and the second most common cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. Current tumor biomarkers for GC, such as serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9, are not ideal due to their limited role as prognostic indicators for GC. Proteasome subunit α7 (PSMA7) is a multifunctional protein, which has been revealed to be involved in the development and progression of various types of malignancy. However, little is known about the role of PSMA7 in GC. In the present study, PSMA7 was identified to be overexpressed at the mRNA and protein levels in GC tissues, compared with in non-tumor tissues, using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry. Furthermore, PSMA7 expression is associated with tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis identified that PSMA7 expression is an independent prognostic factor for poor survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that high PSMA7 expression is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with GC. Overall, the results of the present study suggested that PSMA7 may be a promising biomarker for the prognosis of GC, and may represent a new diagnostic marker and molecular therapeutic target for GC. Copyright: © Xia et al.Entities:
Keywords: gastric cancer; prognosis; proteasome subunit α7
Year: 2019 PMID: 31612044 PMCID: PMC6781669 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10879
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1.Expression of PSMA7 mRNA in 60 paired gastric tissues. The relative level of PSMA7 mRNA expression in gastric carcinoma tissues was significantly increased compared with that in the matching peritumoral tissues (P<0.001). PSMA7, proteasome subunit α7.
Figure 2.Representative images of PSMA7 protein expression in gastric tissue TMA sections. Rows 1 and 3 use PSMA7 staining with ×40 magnification (scale bar, 500 µm), and rows 2 and 4 use PSMA7 staining with ×400 magnification (scale bar, 50 µm). (A) Moderately differentiated GC with high PSMA7 expression. (B) Poorly differentiated GC with high PSMA7 expression. (C) Signet ring cell GC with high PSMA7 expression. (D) Peritumoral tissues with low PSMA7 expression. (E) High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia with low PSMA7 expression. (F) Low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia with low PSMA7 expression. (G) Intestinal metaplasia with low PSMA7 expression. (H) Chronic gastritis with no PSMA7 expression. GC, gastric cancer; PSMA7, proteasome subunit α7.
PSMA7 expression in gastric tissues.
| PSMA7 expression, n (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Total, n | No or Low | High | χ2 | P-value |
| Gastric cancer | 410 | 159 (38.78) | 251 (61.22) | 75.3782 | <0.001 |
| Peritumoral tissue | 212 | 154 (72.64) | 58 (27.36) | 64.0925 | <0.001 |
| High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia | 24 | 15 (62.50) | 9 (37.50) | 5.3110 | 0.021 |
| Low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia | 27 | 18 (66.67) | 9 (33.33) | 8.1745 | 0.004 |
| Intestinal metaplasia | 28 | 17 (60.71) | 11 (39.29) | 5.2460 | 0.022 |
| Chronic gastritis | 34 | 25 (73.53) | 9 (26.47) | 15.6220 | <0.001 |
PSMA7, proteasome subunit α7.
Association of PSMA7 expression with clinicopathological characteristics of patients with gastric cancer.
| PSMA7 expression | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Total, n | No or low (%) | High (%) | χ2 | P-value |
| Total | 410 | 159 (38.78) | 251 (61.22) | ||
| Sex | 2.0689 | 0.150 | |||
| Male | 301 | 123 (40.86) | 178 (59.14) | ||
| Female | 109 | 36 (33.03) | 73 (66.97) | ||
| Age, years | 0.0070 | 0.934 | |||
| ≤60 | 148 | 57 (38.51) | 91 (61.49) | ||
| >60 | 262 | 102 (38.93) | 160 (61.07) | ||
| Histological type | 5.7666 | 0.217 | |||
| Tubular | 322 | 116 (36.02) | 206 (63.98) | ||
| Mucinous | 29 | 13 (44.83) | 16 (55.17) | ||
| Mixed (tubular and mucinous) | 10 | 6 (60.00) | 4 (40.00) | ||
| Signet ring cell | 31 | 16 (51.61) | 15 (48.39) | ||
| Others[ | 18 | 8 (44.44) | 10 (55.56) | ||
| Differentiation | 6.6376 | 0.084 | |||
| Well | 21 | 11 (52.38) | 10 (47.62) | ||
| Moderate | 98 | 38 (38.78) | 60 (61.22) | ||
| Poor | 252 | 89 (35.32) | 163 (64.68) | ||
| Others[ | 39 | 21 (53.85) | 18 (46.15) | ||
| Tumor invasion | 12.7703 | 0.012 | |||
| Tis | 30 | 18 (60.00) | 12 (40.00) | ||
| T1 | 53 | 27 (50.94) | 26 (49.06) | ||
| T2 | 70 | 29 (41.43) | 41 (58.57) | ||
| T3 | 222 | 74 (33.33) | 148 (66.67) | ||
| T4 | 35 | 11 (31.43) | 24 (68.57) | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 12.4718 | 0.006 | |||
| N0 | 163 | 80 (49.08) | 83 (50.92) | ||
| N1 | 81 | 28 (34.57) | 53 (65.43) | ||
| N2 | 89 | 28 (31.46) | 61 (68.54) | ||
| N3 | 77 | 23 (29.87) | 54 (70.13) | ||
| Distant metastasis | 7.4160 | 0.006 | |||
| M0 | 386 | 156 (40.41) | 230 (59.59) | ||
| M1 | 24 | 3 (12.50) | 21 (87.50) | ||
| TNM stage | 24.1716 | <0.001 | |||
| 0 | 30 | 19 (63.33) | 11 (36.67) | ||
| I | 73 | 40 (54.79) | 33 (45.21) | ||
| II | 141 | 54 (38.30) | 87 (61.70) | ||
| III | 142 | 40 (28.17) | 102 (71.83) | ||
| IV | 24 | 6 (25.00) | 18 (75.00) | ||
| Preoperative CEA, ng/ml | 5.1842 | 0.075 | |||
| ≤5 | 177 | 62 (35.03) | 115 (64.97) | ||
| >5 | 44 | 13 (29.55) | 31 (70.45) | ||
| Unknown | 189 | 84 (44.44) | 105 (55.56) | ||
| Preoperative CA199, ng/ml | 1.0034 | 0.605 | |||
| ≤37 | 191 | 79 (41.36) | 112 (58.64) | ||
| >37 | 30 | 11 (36.67) | 19 (63.33) | ||
| Unknown | 189 | 69 (36.51) | 120 (63.49) | ||
Papillary adenocarcinoma, 9 cases; adeno squamous carcinoma, 3 cases; squamous cell carcinoma, 4 cases; neuroendocrine carcinoma, 2 cases.
Including undifferentiated and unknown. CA199, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; M0, metastasis-negative; M1, metastasis-positive; N0, node-negative; N1, 1–2 nodes; N2, 3–6 nodes; N3, >6 nodes; PSMA7, proteasome subunit α7; T1, lamina propria; T2, muscularis propria; T3, subserosa; T4, adjacent structures; Tis, carcinoma in situ; TNM, Tumor-Node-Metastasis.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival in gastric cancer.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | P-value | 95% CI | HR | P-value | 95% CI | |
| PSMA7 expression | ||||||
| High vs. low or no | 1.005 | <0.001 | 1.003–1.007 | 0.995 | 0.001 | 0.993–0.998 |
| Age, years | ||||||
| ≤60 vs. >60 | 3.135 | <0.001 | 2.209–4.450 | |||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male vs. female | 1.109 | 0.903 | 0.747–1.390 | |||
| Histological type, tubular vs. mucinous vs. mixed (tubular and mucinous) vs. signet ring cell vs. others[ | 1.015 | 0.802 | 0.901–1.145 | |||
| Differentiation, well vs. moderate vs. poor vs. others[ | 1.393 | 0.002 | 1.131–1.715 | |||
| Tumor invasion, Tis vs. T1 vs. T2 vs. T3 vs. T4 | 2.059 | <0.001 | 1.714–2.411 | |||
| Lymph node metastasis, N0 vs. N1 vs. N2 vs. N3 | 1.773 | <0.001 | 1.576–1.995 | 1.592 | <0.001 | 1.305–1.941 |
| Distant metastasis, M0 vs. M1 | 3.316 | <0.001 | 2.063–5.330 | |||
| TNM stage, 0 vs. I vs. II vs. III vs. IV | 2.059 | <0.001 | 1.764–2.402 | 1.592 | <0.001 | 1.219–2.709 |
| CEA, ≤5 vs. >5 | 1.151 | 0.053 | 0.998–1.328 | |||
| CA199, ≤37 vs. >37 | 1.133 | 0.081 | 0.985–1.303 | |||
Papillary adenocarcinoma, 9 cases; adeno squamous carcinoma, 3 cases; squamous cell carcinoma, 4 cases; neuroendocrine carcinoma, 2 cases.
Including undifferentiated and unknown. CA199, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembrynoc antigen; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; M0, metastasis-negative; M1, metastasis-positive; N0, node-negative; N1, 1–2 nodes; N2, 3–6 nodes; N3, >6 nodes; PMSA7, proteomic subunit α7; T1, lamina propria; T2, muscularis propria; T3, subserosa; T4, adjacent structures; Tis, carcinoma in situ; TNM, Tumor-Node-Metastasis.
Figure 3.Survival curves of gastric carcinoma generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. (A) OS curves comparing PSMA7 expression levels. (B) Disease-free survival curves comparing PSMA7 expression levels. (C) OS curves comparing levels of tumor invasion. (D) OS curves comparing lymph node metastasis status. (E) OS curves comparing distant metastasis status. (F) OS curves comparing TNM stage. M0, metastasis-negative; M1, metastasis-positive; N0, node-negative; N1, 1–2 nodes; N2, 3–6 nodes; N3, >6 nodes; OS, overall survival; PSMA7, proteasome subunit α7; T1, lamina propria, submucosa; T2, muscularis propria; T3, subserosa; T4, adjacent structures; Tis, carcinoma in situ; TNM, Tumor-Node-Metastasis.